Il 16/06/20 03:47, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>
> Can you file a releng ticket and we can sort out whats going on.
> https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue
>
> It seems like the sidetag setup has some issues still. ;(
>
> kevin
There have been some improvements in sidetag workflow in Bodhi master
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 03:47 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If they build a separate folder manually and are already using the
> > VPATH macros, then there's no change. If they're using a different
> > structure, we can adapt them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 02:21 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> > %cmake macro will be adjusted (-B
> > parameter)
> > to use separate build folder (already standardized
> > %{_vpath_builddir} macro). Additionally,
> >
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/16/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200615git2ccd0be.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 10:04 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> RHEL 8.2 and CentOS 8.2 have an updated qt5. This updated qt5
> allowed
> us to update the KDE Plasma Desktop in EPEL8. We are not at the
> following versions.
>
> qt5 - 5.12
> plasma - 5.18 [1]
> kf5 - 5.68 / 19.12
> apps - 5.18 / 19.12
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:24 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:23:30AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but at least
> > > it hasn't been ejected
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:25 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If they build a separate folder manually and are already using the
> > VPATH macros, then there's no change. If they're using a different
> > structure, we can adapt them to the standard VPATH macros, and do
> > other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846147
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-4.012-1.fc32, perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc32,
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841514
Bug 1841514 depends on bug 1841510, which changed state.
Bug 1841510 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Crypt-Random-Seed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841510
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841510
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Neal Gompa wrote:
> If they build a separate folder manually and are already using the
> VPATH macros, then there's no change. If they're using a different
> structure, we can adapt them to the standard VPATH macros, and do
> other adjustments as needed.
The common idiom in KDE packages is:
mkdir
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:23:30AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> >
> > The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but at least
> > it hasn't been ejected (yet).
>
> And the second one was just cast out as well.
Can you file
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f91ab971e
wordpress-5.1.6-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
php-horde-horde-5.2.23-1.el6
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:05:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> So I'm confused here, does anyone know why the animated wallpapers
> don't work in KDE Plasma or any other desktop? I personally love
> animated wallpapers and I'd like to see this on my KDE Plasma desktop
> too...
I think KDE does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846149
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-4.012-1.fc32, perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc32,
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841910
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846148
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-4.012-1.fc32, perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.012-1.fc32,
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.012-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846509
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844008
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Email-Stuffer-0.017-8. |perl-Email-Stuffer-0.017-8.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but at least
> it hasn't been ejected (yet).
And the second one was just cast out as well.
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847010
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844662
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844664
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975
Bug 1837975 depends on bug 1844662, which changed state.
Bug 1844662 Summary: CVE-2020-10543 perl: heap-based buffer overflow in regular
expression compiler leads to DoS [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844662
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988
Bug 1837988 depends on bug 1844663, which changed state.
Bug 1844663 Summary: CVE-2020-10878 perl: corruption of intermediate language
state of compiled regular expression due to integer overflow leads to DoS
[fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844663
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
Bug 1838000 depends on bug 1844664, which changed state.
Bug 1844664 Summary: CVE-2020-12723 perl: corruption of intermediate language
state of compiled regular expression due to recursive S_study_chunk() calls
leads to DoS [fedora-all]
That depends on the format of the animated wallpapers, which I can't
seem to figure out from this thread nor the changes page.
-- Carson Black [ jan Pontajosi ]
Am Mo., 15. Juni 2020 um 21:06 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:11 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:11 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultAnimatedBackground
>
> == Summary ==
> Fedora Workstation 33 uses animate background as default.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:luya| Luya Tshimbalanga]]
> * Email: luyaATfedoraproject.org
> *
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:22 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> > %cmake macro will be adjusted (-B parameter)
> > to use separate build folder (already standardized
> > %{_vpath_builddir} macro). Additionally,
> > %cmake_build, %cmake_install and
> > %ctest macro
Hello,
A few hours ago I submitted a couple of updates[0,1] that I had built
in side-tags. When I saw that after 7 hours they were still "pending"
I got in touch with infra on irc and Mohan gave them a push. I've just
received a notification that one of them was ejected from the push
because
Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Summary ==
> Fedora Workstation 33 uses animate background as default.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:luya| Luya Tshimbalanga]]
> * Email: luyaATfedoraproject.org
> * Product: Workstation
Is this gimmick really worth the extra space used on all deliverables?
> ==
On 15. 06. 20 21:47, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
== Summary ==
All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
My general feedback:
+ I agree that removing retired and otherwise removed packages on release
boundary
Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Summary ==
> All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:msuchy| Miroslav Suchý]]
> * Email: msu...@redhat.com
Absolute -1!
IMHO, removing working packages from users' systems just because the new
release no longer
Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Summary ==
> %cmake macro will be adjusted (-B parameter)
> to use separate build folder (already standardized
> %{_vpath_builddir} macro). Additionally,
> %cmake_build, %cmake_install and
> %ctest macro will be created (and backported to the older
> supported Fedora
On 16. 06. 20 1:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 15. 06. 20 v 22:10 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
We install/keep fedora-repos-modular by default, users (admins) can
uninstall it if desired. No defaults are changed
How you manage to have it installed by default? It is not obvious from the
linked PR to
Igor Raits wrote:
> I am packaging one nice GUI application (newsflash) that is working
> with API of some services like feedly. Those require some API key, but
> I think it is against their rules to have it included in the plain-text
> format in git. I am curious if there is a way how to get
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:46:30AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Can you give example?
I have a F30 system running the F29 mailgraph package, which was
retired. It was the last remaining blocker preventing that system from
being upgraded to F31. (The others were due to non-fedora-packaged
Ben Cotton wrote:
> The badge claim URL should be valid for a few days beyond the end of
> the voting period. If anyone is unable to claim the badge, they can
> open an issue at https://pagure.io/fedora-project-schedule/new_issue
> and I will manually award badges when the system is back online.
On 6/11/20 8:15 PM, William Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Background: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/51140
Ludwig and Mark both raised some good points here. First is that features today
(EntryUUID, LDAPSsoToken) are both locked behind another language. Rightly so,
they shouldn't be hidden
Dne 15. 06. 20 v 22:10 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> We install/keep fedora-repos-modular by default, users (admins) can
> uninstall it if desired. No defaults are changed
How you manage to have it installed by default? It is not obvious from the
linked PR to me.
I just want to be sure it will be
Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:37 James Cassell napsal(a):
> Please not using mechanism. Make it easy to opt out, or better yet opt-in.
On package level, there is likely no other way. DNF team will have no
time/resources to implement this on DNF level.
I can only thing of /usr/sbin/remove-retired-package
Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:40 Ian McInerney napsal(a):
> and then cleaned them off manually (listing them through `rpm -qa | grep
> fcXX` and then manually removing them), but I
> think it would be better to warn on upgrade when those packages don't exist
> in the newer release to tell the user they
>
Dne 15. 06. 20 v 22:43 Solomon Peachy napsal(a):
> This will silently break otherwise-working software on production
> systems, and provide no straightforward way to get back to a working
> state.
Can you give example?
> What about software installed from 3rd-party repositories? What about
>
>
> ...snip...
>
> What I propose is: As part of the retirement process we add the to
> fedora-retired-packages:
> Obsoletes: foo < %{latestversion+1}
> And during upgrade from F37->F38 the package will be removed.
>
>
I am not a fan of this part. One release cycle seems awfully tight for
this,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020, at 6:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:47:33PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
>
> ...snip...
Please not using mechanism. Make it easy to opt out, or better yet opt-in.
Probably better to
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 01:39:51PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Is there a publicly available more or less up to date mirror of
> src.fedoraproject.org git repos?
>
> I know there is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Grokmirror
>
> But I'd rather not set it up myself, if there is
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > Yeah, I think that'd be better then simply dropping them, if it's
> > > reasonably easy to implement. By releasing those updates we make
> > > things a bit nicer for
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:06 PM Andy Mender
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 04:58, Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>
>> Hello team,
>>
>> Blender 2.83.0 successfuly built on all but one architecture: armv7h.
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1522859
>>
>> Could these
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:47:33PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
...snip...
> If the user wants to preserve the package (e.g., because it moved to
> Copr), he simply uninstalls and protects the installation of
> fedora-retired-packages.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:05:38PM +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 04:58, Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>
> > Hello team,
> >
> > Blender 2.83.0 successfuly built on all but one architecture: armv7h.
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1522859
> >
> >
On 15. 06. 20 21:56, Igor Raits wrote:
I fully agree with the benefits, however I do not like the approach.
Why not to teach DNF system-upgrade about special flag (like --remove-
unmaintained-packages) that will take installed packages, available
packages and remove those that do not exist in
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 03:47:33PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> What I propose is: As part of the retirement process we add the to
> fedora-retired-packages:
> Obsoletes: foo < %{latestversion+1}
> And during upgrade from F37->F38 the package will be removed.
Gah, no. Just.. no.
This will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 16:10 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultAnimatedBackground
>
> == Summary ==
> Fedora Workstation 33 uses animate background as default.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:luya| Luya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 16:10 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSDBMRemoval
>
> == Summary ==
> Network Security Services (NSS) historically supports 2 different
> database backends, based on SQLite and dbm. Since
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularReposSubpackage
== Summary ==
Reintroduce the fedora-repos-modular package. Have the
/etc/yum.repos.d/*-modular.repo files in it instead of
fedora-repos.
We install/keep fedora-repos-modular by default, users (admins) can
uninstall it if desired. No
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultAnimatedBackground
== Summary ==
Fedora Workstation 33 uses animate background as default.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:luya| Luya Tshimbalanga]]
* Email: luyaATfedoraproject.org
* Product: Workstation
== Detailed Description ==
Starting from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSDBMRemoval
== Summary ==
Network Security Services (NSS) historically supports 2 different
database backends, based on SQLite and dbm. Since Fedora 28, the
SQLite backend has been used by default and the dbm backend has been
deprecated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.15.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 0.15.0 or later in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 0.15.0 just released with a bunch of bugfixes and enhancements.
It's always
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.15.0
== Summary ==
Update LXQt to 0.15.0 or later in Fedora.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]]
* Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org
== Detailed Description ==
LXQt 0.15.0 just released with a bunch of bugfixes and enhancements.
It's always
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularReposSubpackage
== Summary ==
Reintroduce the fedora-repos-modular package. Have the
/etc/yum.repos.d/*-modular.repo files in it instead of
fedora-repos.
We install/keep fedora-repos-modular by default, users (admins) can
uninstall it if desired. No
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSDBMRemoval
== Summary ==
Network Security Services (NSS) historically supports 2 different
database backends, based on SQLite and dbm. Since Fedora 28, the
SQLite backend has been used by default and the dbm backend has been
deprecated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultAnimatedBackground
== Summary ==
Fedora Workstation 33 uses animate background as default.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:luya| Luya Tshimbalanga]]
* Email: luyaATfedoraproject.org
* Product: Workstation
== Detailed Description ==
Starting from
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 04:58, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Blender 2.83.0 successfuly built on all but one architecture: armv7h.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1522859
>
> Could these maintainers investigate the cause ? I intend to temporarly
> exclude it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 15:47 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
>
> == Summary ==
> All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:msuchy|
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
== Summary ==
All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:msuchy| Miroslav Suchý]]
* Email: msu...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Right now `fedora-obsoletes-package` retires
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds
== Summary ==
%cmake macro will be adjusted (-B parameter)
to use separate build folder (already standardized
%{_vpath_builddir} macro). Additionally,
%cmake_build, %cmake_install and
%ctest macro will be created (and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
== Summary ==
All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:msuchy| Miroslav Suchý]]
* Email: msu...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Right now `fedora-obsoletes-package` retires
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds
== Summary ==
%cmake macro will be adjusted (-B parameter)
to use separate build folder (already standardized
%{_vpath_builddir} macro). Additionally,
%cmake_build, %cmake_install and
%ctest macro will be created (and
Looking for someone to review the following python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
It's not complicated by any means.
I'll be glad to review another package in return. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list --
I just built version 0.13.0 of ocaml-bin-prot for Rawhide and Fedora
32. The license has changed from "LGPLv2+ with exceptions" to "MIT
and BSD".
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
RHEL 8.2 and CentOS 8.2 have an updated qt5. This updated qt5 allowed
us to update the KDE Plasma Desktop in EPEL8. We are at the following
versions.
qt5 - 5.12
plasma - 5.18 [1]
kf5 - 5.68 / 19.12
apps - 5.18 / 19.12
Installation Instructions:
### First: install epel-release
rpm -Uvh
Good day, BOINC Text User Interface is now available on EPEL 7 and 8, so
you can better manage BOINC client on headless systems.
Just install boinc-tui package and enjoy!
P.S. you may want to join BOINC volunteers to help scientific research
against COVID19. More informations at
Greetings,
Per the EPEL incompatible upgrades policy [0], this is an announcement of a
backwards incompatible update [1] of oniguruma in EPEL 7. This change was
approved by the EPEL steering committee [2]. This update is required to
resolve some outstanding CVEs [3]. I've updated it to the
Help needed!
We're discussing the parameters of the test day, and the difficulty is
answering: "what are the test cases?"
This comment and the one after it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/632#comment-658340
What language simply and properly conveys that the "test case" is
essentially created
On Monday, 15 June 2020 06:51:32 CEST Adrian Reber wrote:
> The following packages are failing:
>
> clementine
I rebuild the dep which was causing issue with clementine (libqxt-qt5,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1507034), would you mind
retrying the rebuild of
Took over both "fritzing" and "fritzing-parts". If anyone would like to join as
co-maintainer, let me know.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
>fritzing logic, orphan1 weeks ago
>fritzing-partslogic, orphan1 weeks ago
I'd be willing to help with this one, but since there already is a
co-maintainer listed, I'll ask first if they're willing to step up to
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Am 15.06.20 um 19:00 schrieb Petr Šabata:
* What is the scope of Modularity? (contyk, 15:35:03)
* AGREED: Modular-only packages are not allowed and modular versions
are only be allowed as alternatives to non-modular packages. (+9, 0,
-0) (contyk, 15:58:47)
(...)
Thank you, FESCo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802358
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
RHEL 8.2 and CentOS 8.2 have an updated qt5. This updated qt5 allowed
us to update the KDE Plasma Desktop in EPEL8. We are not at the
following versions.
qt5 - 5.12
plasma - 5.18 [1]
kf5 - 5.68 / 19.12
apps - 5.18 / 19.12
Installation Instructions:
### First: install epel-release
rpm -Uvh
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-06-15)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-15/fesco.2020-06-15-15.00.log.html
Meeting
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 07:50:11AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:49 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:46 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > We autogenerate RPM Requires/Provides in a few projects, and it's
> > > quite nice. eg:
Hi everybody!
We were discussing getting CCs for bugs of components which you no
longer maintain over in #fedora-admin, and I figured that Pagure should
be able to tell me what components I'm watching, just in case I wanted
to remove myself preemptively, before my inbox gets clogged up.
Turns
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842921
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846490
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1846490
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1846490
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842921
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
Apparently I don't. Access granted. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846491
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846493
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847010
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Doc Type|---
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
