https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890938
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/30/report-389-ds-base-1.4.5.0-20201030git5c25c06.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi Fedora users, developers and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 34.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Sprintf-Named-0.0 |perl-Text-Sprintf-Named-0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.013 |perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Usage-2.01-1.fc34 |perl-Pod-Usage-2.01-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Sprintf-Named-0.0 |perl-Text-Sprintf-Named-0.0
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b21ed088ad
tcpreplay-4.3.3-3.el6
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ca0361c919
lout-3.40-18.el6
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829979
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829978
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b7912a8edb
suricata-5.0.4-1.el8
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e85de73cdb
pdns-recursor-4.3.5-1.el8
8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Barry wrote:
> After the trauma of the 3.0 release it would be mad to do a python 4.0 for
> such a trivial reason as packagers that assumed, wrongly, that version can
> only have single digits.
And/or codes did character comparisons on version values.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-97268d5e98 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-01179f6b9f
suricata-4.1.9-1.el7
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e6c7b4cbec
tcpreplay-4.3.3-3.el7
6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829996
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-615ab4cf53 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.013 |perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Usage-2.01-1.fc34 |perl-Pod-Usage-2.01-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870743
Bug 1870743 depends on bug 1870762, which changed state.
Bug 1870762 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-SQL-Abstract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870773
Bug 1870773 depends on bug 1870762, which changed state.
Bug 1870762 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-SQL-Abstract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893038
Bug ID: 1893038
Summary: Emails from this server (bugzilla.redhat.com) fail to
arrive
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
> On 29 Oct 2020, at 17:29, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:05:53 PM WET Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
> > yesterday.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tomáš Hrnčiar
>
> Thank you for
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:35:19PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 27/10/20 18:49, David Cantrell ha scritto:
Announcing rpminspect-1.2
Thanks for your work, I find rpminspect a really useful tool!
Thank you! Glad you find it useful. Any suggestions for improvements
or additional
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-10-30 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:13:03 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM stan via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Convert the private key and pem certificate to a pk12 structure.
> > openssl pkcs12 -export -out kernel_key.p12 -inkey public_key.pem -in
> >
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:52:09AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of
> > having
> > "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or
> >
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:20:21AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpwatch
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-guile18
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892965
Bug ID: 1892965
Summary: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.03 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892877
Bug ID: 1892877
Summary: F34FailsToInstall: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
I have been using it pretty much daily and haven't had any issues. Is
this only with F33? I have only just updated my "work" machines.
Possibly a misbehaving plugin?
On 10/29/20 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Does anybody experience issues with GVim? It happens quite often, that
it stops
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of
> having
> "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or
> another company -- or, say, an Apache project want to collectively
> maintain packages).
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 06:32:39PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi Davide!
/me waves
> Welcome on board the packagers group!
>
> On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 17:07 -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > Myself, Filipe and Michel are kicking off an effort within Facebook
> >
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:07:33PM -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> I've been involved in the Fedora and CentOS communities for a few years
> now as part of the Operating Systems team at Facebook, and most
> recently helped drive the btrfs by default change proposal for Fedora
> 33.
Hello
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:05:53 PM WET Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
> yesterday.
>
> Regards,
> Tomáš Hrnčiar
Thank you for doing that, and also for the previous round.
But FWIW I still think that it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829996
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829978
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM stan via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> It's been a while since I did this, so it might have changed, but these
> are the steps I went through to create the signing keys. It should at
> least give you some hints, if nothing else.
>
> A lot of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829978
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829979
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|xav...@bachelot.org
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829979
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829996
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
* Vít Ondruch:
> There are possibly still issues. E.g. tracker3-miners is crashing:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892452
SIGSYS indicates that some seccomp sandbox needs fixing. It looks like
fstatat, fstatat64 rules are missing.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH,
Does anybody experience issues with GVim? It happens quite often, that
it stops updating the UI. It seems it does something in background (e.g.
the mouse cursor is changing and window title updating), but the UI is
completely stuck. I am not really sure how to analyze this issue and
where to
Dne 26. 10. 20 v 22:36 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 08:05 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34
OCaml package builds are suddenly failing because the symbols
__xstat64, __fxstat64, and __lxstat64 cannot be found,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892780
Bug ID: 1892780
Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.474 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Verilog-Perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889392
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829996
--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
... and perl-Carp-Assert-More. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829996
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(spo...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #4 from Tom
On 10/27/20 10:47 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
On 10/27/20 10:11 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
On 10/16/20 11:21 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
Hello all,
Here is the updated package review request for github-cli 1.1.0
...
golang-github-cli-shurcool-graphql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892743
Bug ID: 1892743
Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.012000
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Type-Tiny
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On 10/29/20 10:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10/29/20 9:41 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
I think this is due to this buildroot override (maintainer cc'd):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/texlive-base-20200327-16.fc32
I've expired the override, texlive has been built.
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891916
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
psutils-2.03-1.fc34 changed a license from (psutils) to (GPLv3+ and psutils).
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:05:53PM -, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
> yesterday.
Thanks! Both for doing it and the heads-up :)
Pierre
___
devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201028.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201029.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 111
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 28.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hello everyone,
I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
yesterday.
Regards,
Tomáš Hrnčiar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On 10/29/20 9:41 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
I think this is due to this buildroot override (maintainer cc'd):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/texlive-base-20200327-16.fc32
I've expired the override, texlive has been built.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
Hello everyone,
I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
yesterday.
Regards,
Tomáš Hrnčiar
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 10/29/20 4:41 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 19:07, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I'm getting a build failure [1] in F32 that I'm not seeing in other targets
(F31, F33, rawhide are all good).
The error is in the tex packages:
ERROR:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 10/29/20 12:43 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> OTOH If the EOL date is informational only (Anna keeps postgresql:9.5 but
> >> sees a warning during dnf upgrades) and the obsoletes only actually happen
> >> on a specific user action (and on
On 10/29/20 12:43 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
OTOH If the EOL date is informational only (Anna keeps postgresql:9.5 but
sees a warning during dnf upgrades) and the obsoletes only actually happen
on a specific user action (and on release boundary), great.
>
That's how it is suspposed to work. Read
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:43:05PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Currently EOL is defined per stream in PDC. The initial value is provided by
> packagers with "fedpkg request-branch --sl" command. Then the value can be
> edited by relengs based on a ticket.
In general, a big +1 to keeping this
On 29.10.2020 11:20, Jan Synacek wrote:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/purple-plugin_pack
I took this.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dne 29. 10. 20 v 2:32 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
Hi Davide!
Welcome on board the packagers group!
On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 17:07 -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
[snip]
Myself, Filipe and Michel are kicking off an effort within Facebook
to
try and get more of our OSS software
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:13:27PM +0100, Martin Curlej wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:53 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > What are the other means which the 3rd parties use?
> >
>
> Your imagination is the limit. ;) Just joking. Now seriously. For example,
> Redhat and Fedora. The information about
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:02:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> This all seem to revolve around the (mysterious) engineering team. Who
> "owns" the modular EOL information in Fedora, if not the packagers? IIRC
> There is no modularity supervision team in Fedora. The Fedora modularity
> issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829996
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spo...@gmail.com
Flags|
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 11:20 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them:
...
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/logwatch
Thanks for your efforts Jan.
Since I'm involved upstream with logwatch, I've taken this on.
RegardsFrank
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:45 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Change of system jdk to java-11-openjdk is an huge change. It should not be
> missing in release notes. As it seems it is missing, then just for reminder:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11
The release notes section
Jan Synacek writes:
> I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them:
>
[...]
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs
Thank you for all your effort maintaining that package. As a regular
Emacs user I tentatively took it, though I am not sure if I have enough
time to spend on that package (I
Hello!
Change of system jdk to java-11-openjdk is an huge change. It should not be
missing in release notes. As it seems it is missing, then just for reminder:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11
Happy hacking!
J.
On 10/27/20 2:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'm happy to announce
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201028.0):
ID: 709203 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
I orphaned my packages, feel free to take them:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpwatch
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-guile18
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/environment-modules
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-pipes-safe
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201027.0):
ID: 709202 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-97268d5e98 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-97268d5e98
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-615ab4cf53 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-615ab4cf53
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-120adc3050 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-120adc3050
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 19:07, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> I'm getting a build failure [1] in F32 that I'm not seeing in other targets
> (F31, F33, rawhide are all good).
>
> The error is in the tex packages:
>
> ERROR:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1870743
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870743
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1870762
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829982
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |xav...@bachelot.org
--
You are
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:25 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:25PM +0100, Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
> >
> > It's very much not obvious. I believe the root cause is that there are
> > two raw.xz images for Server on armhfp, which are indistinguishable in
> > the metadata. This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892554
Bug ID: 1892554
Summary: perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.21 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-ObjectDriver
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891916
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
92 matches
Mail list logo
