No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210216.0):
ID: 780195 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-87e6bb3010
chromium-88.0.4324.150-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2561abf859
snapd-2.49-1.el8
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928873
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8ee9c2d578 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928873
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-396489f740 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599
openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-01679b76db
chromium-88.0.4324.150-1.el7
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Geo-Distance-0.25-1.fc |perl-Geo-Distance-0.25-1.fc
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, at 8:06 PM, Kevin Anderson wrote:
[...]
> The issue is that when I attempt to push over HTTPS I get an
> authentication failure. I have tried with an API key as well as with
> my FAS password using my FAS username (kanderson) for both. Is it
> expected that I can't push,
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 28/183 (x86_64), 25/124 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210215.n.0):
ID: 779855 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure
URL:
Hello everyone,
I have been a Fedora user for years now and during my $dayjob I work
with Linux systems. RPM packaging is not new to me but contributing to
those packages as a part of a distribution is.
I was hoping to see if I could resolve the build failures for restic
to upgrade it to the
OLD: Fedora-34-20210215.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210216.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 222
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 794.70 KiB
Size of dropped packages:829.81 KiB
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:10 PM Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 2/14/21 2:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > This isn't sufficiently qualified. It does work to reduce space
> > consumption and write amplification. It's just that there's a tradeoff
> > that you dislike, which is IO reduction. And it's
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210214.1):
ID: 780137 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780137
ID:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Branched 20210216.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 29/183 (x86_64), 19/124
Hi,
On 2/14/21 2:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:45 PM Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 2/11/21 11:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 1/1/21 8:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Anyway, compress=zstd:1 is a good default.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929447
Bug ID: 1929447
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.01 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
I've orphaned libmirage. It was assigned to an ex-redhatter with an invalid
bugzilla email address. I've contacted them offlist via their private email and
got their blessing.
It was updated to 2.0.0 8 years ago and nothing in Fedora depends on it, so I
guess no harm done if it gets retired.
On 17/02/2021 04:24, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 16.02.21 um 15:03 schrieb Ed Greshko:
Thanks for the help!
FWIW, I suppose I don't know why a BZ is needed since the
/etc/systemd/resolved.conf has a sample
for the DNS= parameter showing:
I think that "," is received by a dhcp answere from
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-02-17 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues
Hi all.
I've orphaned 'dianara' [1]; feel free to adopt it.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dianara
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/
OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Hi all.
'fido-pi' [1] package is no longer supported since it's now integrated
into 'percolator' [2]. So, i'm retiring it in Fedora 34 and Fedora 35.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fido-pi
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/percolator
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
Am 16.02.21 um 15:03 schrieb Ed Greshko:
Thanks for the help!
FWIW, I suppose I don't know why a BZ is needed since the
/etc/systemd/resolved.conf has a sample
for the DNS= parameter showing:
I think that "," is received by a dhcp answere from the dhcpd, which
knows two dns and sets
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 03:38:35PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > if version_at(commit) != last_version:
> > > return 0
> >
> > Should this be "return 1"?
>
> No, 0 is
It could be useful to create a wiki table with some of the key features
of the most common boards other Fedora collaborators are already using
I already created a table showing the things I had in mind choosing
between the Raptor products, it would be fairly easy to copy and paste
it to the
On 16/02/2021 17:05, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On 15/02/2021 19:47, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 6:39 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>>>
The open question still is whether we should try to keep 64k as default
as it would allow to find the remaining bugs and offer 4k kernel
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-LDAP` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
FMF
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LDAP/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi everyone,
we still want your feedback about your experiences with the CPE Team.
The survey will take only few minutes and there is still some time left
before the survey will be closed.
Here is the link to survey https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/4?lang=en
> On 15/02/2021 19:47, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 6:39 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> >> The open question still is whether we should try to keep 64k as default
> >> as it would allow to find the remaining bugs and offer 4k kernel variant
> >> (COPR for ppc64le should be coming
Hi,
On 2/13/21 10:41 PM, Tom Seewald wrote:
> The GPUs also have firmware blobs
Could you provide some links to mailing list posts or bug reports where AMD
developers confirm that their GPU firmware requires 4k pages? I think having
some definitive sources will make this situation more
The change complete (100% complete) deadline for Fedora 34 changes is
Tuesday 23 February. At that point, changes should be 100% code
complete, along with supporting documentation where appropriate.
Please indicate this by setting the tracker bug for your change to
ON_QA.
Other upcoming schedule
The change complete (100% complete) deadline for Fedora 34 changes is
Tuesday 23 February. At that point, changes should be 100% code
complete, along with supporting documentation where appropriate.
Please indicate this by setting the tracker bug for your change to
ON_QA.
Other upcoming schedule
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-LDAP` that you are
following:
``
FMF
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LDAP/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi
I can't run the tests but anyway I wanted to thank the developpers for their
very usefull job.
Le Tue Feb 16 2021 01:02:47 GMT+0100 (CET), Mukundan Ragavan
a écrit :
On 2/15/21 5:50 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 2/7/21 8:56 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926922
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-CBC-3.01-1.fc35
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Product Errata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
--- Comment #21 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Via RHSA-2021:0557 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0557
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > if version_at(commit) != last_version:
> > > return 0
> >
> > Should this be "return 1"?
>
> No, 0 is correct. If
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > if version_at(commit) != last_version:
> > return 0
>
> Should this be "return 1"?
No, 0 is correct. If the version does not match, this is the last
commit *before* a version
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 02:48:23PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > The goal of this change is to deploy in production the
> >
The pipx package has changed upstream from MIT and BSD to just MIT.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
W dniu pon, 15.02.2021 o godzinie 17∶40 -0500, użytkownik Steve Dickson
napisał:
> Hello,
>
> I just updated to latest Fedora 33 and
> I no longer have any DNS name solution.
> The network is up... but...
>
> $ ping www.yahoo.com
> ping: www.yahoo.com: Name or service not known
>
> I changed
On 16/02/2021 21:37, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 2/15/21 9:16 PM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
Steve Dickson wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:04:52PM -0500:
I think if no IP was successfully parsed the fallback ought to kick in,
so it's a systemd-resolved bug -- do you want to report this upstream
On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I wonder why you're not relying solely on git history for both local
builds and in koji?
I'd also appreciate if the only source of truth would be git history.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:02 PM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:46:57PM -0600:
> > We removed the fallbacks due to complaints from users who didn't want DNS
> > ever going to Cloudflare or Google. So the lack of fallback is expected
> and
> >
On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
if version_at(commit) != last_version:
return 0
Should this be "return 1"?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec
>
> == Summary ==
> The goal of this change is to deploy in production the
> [https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/ rpmautospec]
> project.
>
> With it, the content of the
On 2/16/21 6:05 AM, David Both wrote:
> This situation is due to the change from the old resolver to the new
> systemd-resolved.
>
> I have a page on my technical web site that describes the problem and the
> circumvention.
>
> http://www.linux-databook.info/?page_id=5951
>
> This does not,
On 2/15/21 9:16 PM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Steve Dickson wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:04:52PM -0500:
>>> I think if no IP was successfully parsed the fallback ought to kick in,
>>> so it's a systemd-resolved bug -- do you want to report this upstream or
>>> shall I now I've had a look?
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Add tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Business-ISMN-1.202-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62081545
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1757269
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1757269=edit
[patch] Update to 1.202 (#1929205)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205
Bug ID: 1929205
Summary: perl-Business-ISMN-1.202 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISMN
Keywords: FutureFeature,
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder` that you are following:
``
Add tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 11:50 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 14. 02. 21 v 19:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > So, I am a bit leary of this change for the same reason that I was for
> > the last few changes like this. Namely, we are building out own layer on
> > top of rpm to make our lives easier,
Hey Folks!
Google Summer of Code (GSoC) is a global program focused on
introducing students to open source software development. Students
work on a 10-week programming project with an open-source organization
during their break from a post-secondary academic program. Fedora has
had great
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928873
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8ee9c2d578 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8ee9c2d578
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928873
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-396489f740 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-396489f740
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928873
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
This situation is due to the change from the old resolver to the new
systemd-resolved.
I have a page on my technical web site that describes the problem and the
circumvention.
http://www.linux-databook.info/?page_id=5951
This does not, erm, resolve the problem but it does get you back to a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210215.0):
ID: 779083 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929046
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
perl-Dumbbench-0.501-1.fc35 changed license from
((GPL+ or Artistic) and (Artistic 2.0)) to
(GPL+ or Artistic).
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dumbbench` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
test
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dumbbench/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dumbbench` that you
are following:
``
test
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dumbbench/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
64 matches
Mail list logo
