Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mi, 24.02.21 22:08, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > I think one of the issues reported in the discussion you mention was > that systemd-resolved considered invalid a DNS= line where addresses > were separated by a comma rather than space. Can systemd-resolved be > improved to

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

Dne 25. 02. 21 v 18:19 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): What I do is use "rpmspec -q --srpm" to do queries on packages for dependencies. For example, you can do something like: rpmspec --target x86_64 -q --srpm --buildrequires package.spec That gets you a list of BRs for x86_64. I suppose this

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210226.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210225.0): ID: 790239 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Meaning of Size Directories

Dnia Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:20:34PM -0300, Sergio Belkin napisał(a): > Hi, > Tools such as ls or stat report the size of a directory. Of course it is > not the content size. It depends on the filesystem. For Cephfs, directory size _is_ the content size: % ls -lh drwxrwxr-x. 3 zdzichu zdzichu

Re: Meaning of Size Directories

On 2/25/21 6:56 PM, John Reiser wrote: >> Tools such as ls or stat report the size of a directory. Of course it is not >> the content size. >> stat -c %s  /home/sergio/.config >> 6550 >> >> What does 6550 mean in btrfs context? > > Regardless of filesystem type, the size of a directory is the

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-02-26 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/02/26/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210226git60e35aac5.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Meaning of Size Directories

El jue, 25 feb 2021 a las 21:58, John Reiser () escribió: > > Tools such as ls or stat report the size of a directory. Of course it is > not the content size. > > stat -c %s /home/sergio/.config > > 6550 > > > > What does 6550 mean in btrfs context? > > Regardless of filesystem type, the size of

Re: Meaning of Size Directories

Tools such as ls or stat report the size of a directory. Of course it is not the content size. stat -c %s  /home/sergio/.config 6550 What does 6550 mean in btrfs context? Regardless of filesystem type, the size of a directory is the sum of the sizes of the struct linux_dirent (or

CPE Weekly Report: 2021-02-26

Hi Everyone, If you would like to see this report and toggle to the section you are most interested in, I would suggest visiting this link https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ?view and use the header bar on your left to skip to where you want to go! ## Initiative FYI Links Initiatives repo

Fedora-34-20210225.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 26/187 (x86_64), 17/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210222.n.0): ID: 789727 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/789727 ID: 789735

Re: Meaning of Size Directories

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 2:21 PM Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Hi, > Tools such as ls or stat report the size of a directory. Of course it is not > the content size. > stat -c %s /home/sergio/.config > 6550 > > What does 6550 mean in btrfs context? stat -c %s reports the st_size of the directory

[Bug 1932390] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: [dns-sig] split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

On 2/25/21 9:06 AM, Peter Boy wrote: > >> Am 24.02.2021 um 18:18 schrieb Paul Wouters : >> There is no technical reason why this is not in its own package. There >> has been some focussing on reducing minimal installs, and this is a >> prime candidate for that. I'm fine with the workstation or

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210225.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210222.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210225.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:19 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:37 Upgraded packages: 168 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.50 MiB Size of dropped packages:584.67

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

I disagree and do more below :) On 2/23/21 2:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 22.02.21 09:45, Michael Catanzaro (mcatanz...@gnome.org) wrote: > 65;6201;1c >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:05 pm, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>> 3) Configure DNS resolvers if you want to use DNS. >>> Or dig deeper:

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Servers don't need split DNS. Desktops do. Without a DNS cache, your > DNS will be slower. Without split DNS, your DNS may not work properly > at all. Not all desktops need split DNS. Most desktop users don't even have anything to split the DNS over. (It needs either

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

No, this is not true. DNS servers had for ages ability to forward selected domains to specified list of addresses. All DNS caches have the ability to do it for no reason. Servers do not have automatic configuration of split DNS only, because often do not have multiple connections. But I think

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210225.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210225.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Meaning of Size Directories

I know next to nothing about btrfs, but on ext family of filesystems, directories are technically just special files. Those files contain a simple list of directory entries (i.e. filename <-> inode number pairs). So I guess in the case of ext, stat reports the size of this list.

Meaning of Size Directories

Hi, Tools such as ls or stat report the size of a directory. Of course it is not the content size. stat -c %s /home/sergio/.config 6550 What does 6550 mean in btrfs context? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

On 25/02/2021 16:02, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 11:57 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: [...snip...] * NetworkManger and OpenVPN Outside of that, OpenVPN via NetworkManager will be a different beast to tackle which we have not yet dug into from the OpenVPN project side.  From

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I understand, thanks for the explanation. We will wait to see what other maintainers and upstreams will say. This explanation is exactly what we need to have as much information as we can. Hopefully other maintainers will soonly present their opinions as well. Thanks. Ondrej On Thu, Feb 25,

Fedora-IoT-35-20210225.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210224.0): ID: 789572 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/789572 ID:

Fedora 34 Beta blocker review email #3

Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. dogtag-pki — FreeIPA server deployment fails in current F34 and Rawhide composes — NEW ACTION: dogtag-pki maintainers to fix package to work with updated 389-ds-base. 2. mesa — gnome-shell: nouveau_fence_signalled():

Re: ELN SIG Launch

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:25 AM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > > > ELN Special Interest Group (SIG) > ... > > A weekly meeting time will be reserved for the ELN SIG to meet. However, it > > will be canceled if there are no issues

[389-devel] Re: Were you unexpectedly subscribed to this list?

I didn't subscribe either, please remove me. From: Casey Mulholland Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:43 AM To: 389 Directory server developer discussion. <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-devel] Re: Were you unexpectedly subscribed to this list? I didn't subscribe, please

[389-devel] Re: Were you unexpectedly subscribed to this list?

I didn't subscribe, please remove me. Thanks! From: Andrew Small Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 9:41 AM To: 389 Directory server developer discussion. <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: [389-devel] Re: Were you unexpectedly subscribed to this list?

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 08:17:20AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:06:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:08:56PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > yum distro-sync --releasever 34 > > > Last metadata expiration

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:19 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 02. 21 17:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 25. 02. 21 16:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >>> But I'd argue that it's definitely not good that there's currently *no > >>> way*

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On 25. 02. 21 17:39, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 25. 02. 21 16:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: But I'd argue that it's definitely not good that there's currently *no way* to query BuildRequires*correctly* and*reproducibly* (other than possibly

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-02-26 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 07:55:09AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Brian, > > I understand, but as I already said, compat package can lead to > unwillingness to move forward to autoconf-2.71. For example, we can have a > compat package for f35 to have time to deal with the problems, but > certainly

[Bug 1837988] CVE-2020-10878 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to integer overflow leads to DoS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1933099 -- You

[Bug 1837975] CVE-2020-10543 perl: heap-based buffer overflow in regular expression compiler leads to DoS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1933100 -- You

[Bug 1838000] CVE-2020-12723 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to recursive S_study_chunk() calls leads to DoS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1933098 -- You

[389-devel] Re: Were you unexpectedly subscribed to this list?

I didn't subscribe, please remove me. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:58 AM Mark Reynolds wrote: > We've had a very large inflow of subscriptions requests recently, and > there are concerns something malicious might be going on. If you are > getting these emails, but you have not subscribed

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 02. 21 16:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > But I'd argue that it's definitely not good that there's currently *no > > way* to query BuildRequires*correctly* and*reproducibly* (other than > > possibly rebuilding all fedora SRPM files

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

Another dot on the map: Issues: - rdma-core (known problem) - jami (third party repo, does not have f34 yet) - mpd (requires libupnp.so.16, but there seems to be only libupnp.so.17 in f34 available) Error: Problem 1: package jami-daemon-20210219.1.9530a07-1.fc33.x86_64 requires

Fedora-Rawhide-20210225.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 20/126 (aarch64), 22/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

Hi! On 25/02/2021 14:39, Petr Menšík wrote: [..snip...] It is not optimal yet, but we plan to provide full support for split-DNS (only pushed domains will be resolved via the DNS server requested by the VPN server) and exclusive DNS (use only the DNS server pushed by VPN server). > This case

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On 25. 02. 21 16:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: But I'd argue that it's definitely not good that there's currently *no way* to query BuildRequires*correctly* and*reproducibly* (other than possibly rebuilding all fedora SRPM files for each target architecture, but I do not have the resources - nor

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:51 am, Florian Weimer wrote: Why do you think that? Servers don't need split DNS. Desktops do. Without a DNS cache, your DNS will be slower. Without split DNS, your DNS may not work properly at all. ___ devel mailing

Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

Hello everybody, There's a problem that's been puzzling me for months, since I started writing the repochecker service (which provides the backend FTI/FTBFS data for the new packager-dashboard): There is no correct "source of truth" for BuildRequires / complete package dependency graphs. While

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 11:57 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 22/02/2021 16:29, Petr Menšík wrote: > > Why? I thought about common interface to various DNS cache > > implementations for workstations and different VPN providers > > available. > > While I think the best place to direct, which

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210225.n.0 changes

On 25. 02. 21 15:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:13 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Package: buildah-define.Version-0.10.dev.giteb42398.fc35 Old package: buildah-define.Version-0.8.dev.gita5e80a5.fc35 Summary: A command line tool used for creating OCI Images

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210225.n.0 changes

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:13 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > Package: buildah-define.Version-0.10.dev.giteb42398.fc35 > Old package: buildah-define.Version-0.8.dev.gita5e80a5.fc35 > Summary: A command line tool used for creating OCI Images > RPMs: buildah buildah-tests >

Re: sssd: No %post/%preun/%postun?!?

On 25/02/2021 13:58, Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:39 AM Tom Hughes > wrote: On 25/02/2021 13:13, Richard Shaw wrote: > Per the packaging guidelines these don't seem to be optional: > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210225.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210223.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210225.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 132 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.81 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: sssd: No %post/%preun/%postun?!?

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:39 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > On 25/02/2021 13:13, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Per the packaging guidelines these don't seem to be optional: > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_systemd > > < >

Re: sssd: No %post/%preun/%postun?!?

On 25/02/2021 13:13, Richard Shaw wrote: Per the packaging guidelines these don't seem to be optional: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_systemd Indeed they're not optional,

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

Hi David, more below. On 2/25/21 11:57 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 22/02/2021 16:29, Petr Menšík wrote: >> Why? I thought about common interface to various DNS cache >> implementations for workstations and different VPN providers available. >> While I think the best place to direct, which

Re: Please remove "-i" from "%forgemeta" templates on wiki

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 18:54, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > I don't think "documentation is harder to keep up to date there" is > right, > > Well, I guess it does not apply that much to the pages which were already > in > an ACL-locked

sssd: No %post/%preun/%postun?!?

Per the packaging guidelines these don't seem to be optional: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_systemd Additionally, at a minimum systemctl daemon-reload should be run. It looks like there is some sort of default behavior but it's not correct. Warning: The

[Bug 1932390] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5a096a1b32 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5a096a1b32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: glibc redefines SIGSTKSZ and MINSTKSZ (Re: pagure pushed to stress-ng (rawhide). "Fix build with glibc 2.34 (..more)")

* Tomasz Kłoczko: > Is it not kind of a mistake in case of glibc to introduce such > changes? (just asking to only have confirmation that it was not actual > mistake and not to start another flame) We don't have a choice. The old interfaces are simply incompatible with modern hardware. CPUs

[Bug 1932390] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies] PR #1: Tests

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-FindDependencies` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

glibc redefines SIGSTKSZ and MINSTKSZ (Re: pagure pushed to stress-ng (rawhide). "Fix build with glibc 2.34 (..more)")

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 10:52, wrote: > Notification time stamped 2021-02-25 10:17:40 UTC > > From a9bc8b5947d10f13996e6e5d7280e5860473bbd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yaakov Selkowitz > Date: Feb 25 2021 03:05:37 + > Subject: Fix build with glibc 2.34 > > >

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

On 22/02/2021 16:29, Petr Menšík wrote: Why? I thought about common interface to various DNS cache implementations for workstations and different VPN providers available. While I think the best place to direct, which interface resolvers should handle given domains. resolvconf handles conflicting

[rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies] PR #1: Tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-FindDependencies` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

* Michael Catanzaro: > FWIW I agree that systemd-resolved is *much* less important for > servers and containers than it is on desktops. Why do you think that? Caching DNS server availability is a commonly requested feature even in data center deployments. The way Fedora currently implements

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210225.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210224.0): ID: 788994 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1932390] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932390 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

> Am 24.02.2021 um 20:19 schrieb Lennart Poettering : > > On Mi, 24.02.21 12:49, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote: > > > I think the caching and DoT stuff that resolved provides is useful on > any system, and that includes servers, and I think it would be good to > minimize the difference

Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

* Paul Wouters: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Petr Menšík wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved >> in case I don't want it? > > In the past I also mentioned this. The overwhelming majority of installs > do not gain any benefit from te systemd-resolved

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:06:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:08:56PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > yum distro-sync --releasever 34 > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:11 ago on Wed 24 Feb 2021 11:55:46 AM > > CST. > > Error: > > Problem:

Re: [dns-sig] split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

> Am 24.02.2021 um 18:18 schrieb Paul Wouters : > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Petr Menšík wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved >> in case I don't want it? > > …. > There is no technical reason why this is not in its own package. There > has been