No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210313.0):
ID: 813643 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 10/126 (aarch64)
ID: 813393 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813393
ID: 813402 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813402
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:49 AM Davide Cavalca via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit
> > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda
>
> One thing I'd be interested in
On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
gdl
vtk
I've added patches for proj 8 support to these packages and submitted
builds in the side tag.
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 34 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
fix corruption of your rpm db ! the output of this command is changed : rpm
--rebuilddb
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 8151
Header SHA256 digest: BAD ...
I don't know if
dnf update kernel-*.rpm
fix this issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
On 3/13/21 6:39 AM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#3860
Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected
b9cf6988fce9f83cb6cbddc260ab4832a15af3e718884156e0c73ba344897c27 !=
f863601defc3132bc5a1b3d09f23b43ab76c6cf0400a0c1a487ea7b2f6
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:00:12 -0500, you wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people
>> refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux
>> distributions.
>
>Again, I'm not out
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/126 (aarch64), 7/187 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210312.n.0):
ID: 812946 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812946
ID: 812947 Test: a
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/187 (x86_64), 22/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people
> refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux
> distributions.
Again, I'm not out to immediately change colloquial usage. Although I *d
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210312.0):
ID: 813187 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813187
ID: 813196 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210312.0):
ID: 813156 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813156
ID: 8131
and finally test works
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_kernel_regression :
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Not affected
[mythcat@desk kernel-tests]$ sudo semanage boolean -m --off selinuxuser_execheap
__
[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#3860
Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected
b9cf6988fce9f83cb6cbddc260ab4832a15af3e718884156e0c73ba344897c27 !=
f863601defc3132bc5a1b3d09f23b43ab76c6cf0400a0c1a487ea7b2f680f176)
Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 4d669b407
OLD: Fedora-34-20210312.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210313.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:12
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#8151
Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected
c1c39a204c8615afaa00d00e81982e55c6ce1b0f88b9703de5fafebb5abe67a1 !=
86dbba11d5da0b2ebb39edbd68719299e9a848c83b25c8235a27fd1d9d75d024)
Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 01f1aa166
[root@desk mythcat]# dnf list fedora-gpg-keys
Last metadata expiration check: 1:06:12 ago on Sat 13 Mar 2021 02:57:37 PM EET.
Installed Packages
fedora-gpg-keys.noarch
[root@desk mythcat]# dnf repolist
repo idrepo name
WineHQ
Any idea ?
I try to follow this wiki page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-08_Kernel_5.11_Test_Week
according with this article:
https://fedoramagazine.org/contribute-at-the-fedora-audio-kernel-5-11-and-i18n-test-days/
This is the errors and BAD signature response :
...
[root@d
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Branched 20210313.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210313.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 93
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 306.57 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>I would put it this way: this change _helps recognize_ that Fedora is more
>>than its main product. This isn't new; EPEL has been part of Fedora since
>>the beginning, and CoreOS has been since it replaced Project Atomic.
Hi,
Am 12.03.21 um 18:50 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Well, sure, but I doubt it. None of the pinephone editions has shipped
with Fedora, so it would take people seeking it out and installing it,
so I don't know that there would be too much increase just from this.
It was just a theory, that matched
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210312.0):
ID: 812514 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
24 matches
Mail list logo
