https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974141
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Config-INI-0.026 is|perl-Config-INI-0.027 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974093
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974101
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On 23. 06. 21 0:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Outside of that on the technical side... if these are from stream they
might not always work for base epel would they?
I think that if we don't download the latest version from Stream, but the build
with the corresponding epoch:version-release to the
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 18:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:42 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Matthew Miller:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:48:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > We've talked about various concerns around this in the past (the
> > > >
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:42 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Matthew Miller:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:48:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> We've talked about various concerns around this in the past (the
> >> technicalities of exactly how to implement it, and the concern that not
>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:00:48PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 21. 06. 21 23:05, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific
> > package in private, you can email:
> > packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org
> >
> > You
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:53:05PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Someone brought this proposal to me, I'd like to get others feedback.
>
> Proposal:
> EPEL would make its own "devel" repo, with the missing RHEL packages,
> grabbing the packages from the publicly available centos stream koji
>
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 23:27 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> Lovely, thank you (and to Carlos for suggesting a workaround)! It works
> fine here, so please post bugzilla once you create it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974970
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
Lovely, thank you (and to Carlos for suggesting a workaround)! It works
fine here, so please post bugzilla once you create it.
Thanks again,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:49 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 09:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 08:13 -0700,
Am 22.06.21 um 18:34 schrieb Karolina Surma:
borgbackup fschwarz
Thank you for your work on Sphinx. borgbackup should be fixed in rawhide.
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 12:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing it too (Kevin and I talked about it last night, but couldn't
> > work out the problem). My upgrade package set was:
>
> garnacho suggested setting MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=i965 in
> /etc/environment, and that does
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 09:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 08:13 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Seems with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Hello,
As you may already know [0], we plan to upgrade the Python documentation
framework Sphinx to a new major version - currently it's 4.0.2.
The update will take place on Monday, *June 28th*.
Packages that stopped building or running with the newest Sphinx stack
were identified during the
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 13:22, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras,
> >> but not for epel8:
> >>
> >>
Dne 22. 06. 21 v 18:34 Karolina Surma napsal(a):
Feel free to use the Copr repository to test your package there.
Tip - if you want to test locally then:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
--addrepo=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ksurma/pygments-2.9.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 06. 21 4:48, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > This may result in testing failures when
> > applications try to test uncommon character set conversions. The fix
> > to get that working again is to add a build dependency on
> >
On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
not for epel8:
Package openjdk-asmtools builds fine in fedora, epel7 and rhel8, but not in
epel8:
I've tried now:
kernel: 5.13.0-0.rc2.19.fc35
mesa: 21.1.1-2.fc35
Yes, I also have an Intel GPU.
Different stacktrace, same issue…
Stack trace of thread 1103:
#0 0x7f7e87d6b819 type_iface_peek_holder_L.lto_priv.0
(libgobject-2.0.so.0 + 0x33819)
#1 0x7f7e87d6159c
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
> not for epel8:
>
> Package openjdk-asmtools builds fine in fedora, epel7 and rhel8, but not in
> epel8:
> CentOS-8 - Extras
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DB_File` that you
are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DB_File/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello.
fmt 8.0.x update will include soversion bump from .7 to .8.
All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Hello,
As you may already know [0], we plan to upgrade the Python documentation
framework Sphinx to a new major version - currently it's 4.0.2.
The update will take place on Monday, *June 28th*.
Packages that stopped building or running with the newest Sphinx stack
were identified during the
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
not for epel8:
Package openjdk-asmtools builds fine in fedora, epel7 and rhel8, but not in
epel8:
CentOS-8 - Extras 4.3 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:00
Extra Packages for Enterprise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974679
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974101
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0b372c6a1a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0b372c6a1a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974101
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 08:13 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a
> > > ~month) I
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-23 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-23 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974093
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ee3a08c3c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ee3a08c3c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974093
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a
> > ~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973893
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-06-23 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2021-06-23 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Bi-weekly meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F35MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974093
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
* Matthew Miller:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:48:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> We've talked about various concerns around this in the past (the
>> technicalities of exactly how to implement it, and the concern that not
>> enough composes actually meet the requirements so we'd wind up
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F35MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following packages
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XXX` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XXX/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:48:15AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We've talked about various concerns around this in the past (the
> technicalities of exactly how to implement it, and the concern that not
> enough composes actually meet the requirements so we'd wind up with few
> composes synced
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a
> ~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to
> downgrade mesa, mutter, gnome-shell, kernel and a few other packages but no
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:49 PM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:46 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, the script is failing the glib2 build due to an invalid rpath, but
>> unless I'm missing something obvious, I think it's valid. Reported:
>>
>>
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/199 (x86_64), 10/134 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XXX` that you are
following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XXX/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Dne 20. 06. 21 v 10:42 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Rather than "no bots allowed" policy, we might need a "bots that violate our policies and guidelines or have a
tendency to break things will be disabled until fixed" policy.
Every bot has been written by somebody. 1) it should be always clear who
On 21. 06. 21 23:05, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific
package in private, you can email:
packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org
You can also now mail:
packagename-maintainers-fed...@fedoraproject.org to just reach the
Hi everyone,
You may have seen me by now in the mailing lists or on IRC. Let me
introduce myself. My name is Arthur Bols. I'm a Computer Science student
from Belgium with a strong interest in FOSS and Linux. In 2017 I joined
a student organization which strives to bring Computer Science and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974288
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
Greetings.
As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific
package in private, you can email:
packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org
You can also now mail:
packagename-maintainers-fed...@fedoraproject.org to just reach the
fedora branch(es) maintainer(s).
or
Greetings.
As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific
package in private, you can email:
packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org
You can also now mail:
packagename-maintainers-fed...@fedoraproject.org to just reach the
fedora branch(es) maintainer(s).
or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973900
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f5135e5a2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f5135e5a2b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210621.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210622.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 136
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 18.03 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello.
I've created my first Perl package and I need somebody who can review
it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974666
The git-autofixup is very useful plugin for git.
I can take a review in exchange - most of my experience is with Python
packages.
Have a nice day.
Lumír
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973900
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Dispatchouli`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatchouli/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973893
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Dispatchouli`
that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatchouli/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi all,
one of my packages (newsboat) grew yet another rust dependency,
and I need that dependency RPM reviewed [1].
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974377
I'm willing to take a review in exchange, if you need any.
Note that I tried to write directly to rust-sig ML,
but that
* Miro Hrončok:
> On 22. 06. 21 4:48, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>> This may result in testing failures when
>> applications try to test uncommon character set conversions. The fix
>> to get that working again is to add a build dependency on
>> glibc-gconv-extra.
>
> Could you please add
On 22. 06. 21 4:48, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
This may result in testing failures when
applications try to test uncommon character set conversions. The fix
to get that working again is to add a build dependency on
glibc-gconv-extra.
Could you please add "glibc-gconv-extra" provide to glibc on
It seems that every reboot has different errors.
https://paste.centos.org/view/514a7357
Now I get:
Stack trace of thread 1167:
#0 0x7f3272948f53 n/a
(libc.so.6 + 0x8df53)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974679
Bug ID: 1974679
Summary: perl-DB_File-1.856 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210621.0):
ID: 914028 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/914028
ID: 914029 Test: x86_64
* Igor Raits:
> Hello,
>
> Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a
> ~month) I can't get
> Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to downgrade mesa, mutter,
> gnome-shell, kernel and a few other packages but no luck.
>
> Is it just my laptop that's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973900
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hello,
Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a
~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to
downgrade mesa, mutter, gnome-shell, kernel and a few other packages but no
luck.
Is it just my laptop that's somehow broken?
Stack trace looks
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> >> glibc-gconv-extra is recommended by glibc, so a regular update or
> >> default installation should pull in glibc-gconv-extra and there should
> >> be no noticeable change unless a user
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210621.0):
ID: 914013 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>> glibc-gconv-extra is recommended by glibc, so a regular update or
>> default installation should pull in glibc-gconv-extra and there should
>> be no noticeable change unless a user explicitly removes
>> glibc-gconv-extra at some point.
>
> To preserve
Hello, I'm orphaning the vim-syntastic package as I no longer use that
(I switched to vim-ale a few months back). Feel free to pick that package,
if you happen to use it and you can not migrate - but upstream of syntastic
recommends the migration:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/22/report-389-ds-base-2.0.5-20210622git59d889ad1.fc34.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:18:09AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> [Fixing up my mailing list settings and re-sending]
>
> Hello,
>
> Apologies for the delayed announcement but as of
> glibc-2.34.9000-13.fc35, the glibc package has been split to create a
> new package glibc-gconv-extra to
77 matches
Mail list logo
