The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
33 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-92a8baa028
tor-0.3.5.15-1.el7
7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-698907eb45
quassel-0.13.1-8.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
nagios-plugins-snmp-disk-proc-1.3.1-14.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Config-INI-Reader-Orde |perl-Config-INI-Reader-Orde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018-1.fc3 |perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodW |perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 01:01 +, Randy Barlow via devel wrote:
> An example of this is gstreamer - in Gentoo I just have
> gstreamer installed, and the various plugin packs like good bad and
> ugly are just USE variables on that one package.
Ooops, I was wrong on this example. They do package
Hello,
I tried to contact the people behind "Standard Test interface" CI.
I sent the e-mail about 3 weeks ago.
Then after about 2 weeks (= ~1 week ago) I reacted to the same email
so it would appear in their inboxes again.
Yet no response came, so i'm trying here.
-- Original message
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:36 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > On the "uni-repo" counter proposal: there's a bunch of real-world
> > examples here of distributions using this successfully:
> >
On 30. 06. 21 1:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
On Tue, Jun 29 2021 at 11:05:26 PM +0200, Dan Čermák
wrote:
Thanks a lot for this Michel!
Yes, this will reduce packager pain and suffering. Nice!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Thanks a lot for this Michel!
Ben Cotton writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
> [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
> memory-constraints]), for optionally
On 29. 06. 21 18:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Would these rawhide builds go out in ELN composes?
I suppose they would got here, see below why I think it would be necessary.
The amount of "true ELN" builds in ELN compose would be the general
"healthiness" factor. When 100 %: perfect. When 90 %:
On 29. 06. 21 21:10, Troy Dawson wrote:
Two issues I see deal with failed builds and new dependencies.
1 - failed builds.
Will there be an easy way for the ELN SIG (or whoever) to see what the failed
builds are? Or are all of these builds fire and forget?
Previously, failed build resulted in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
== Summary ==
Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
[https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
memory-constraints]), for optionally limiting build parallelism for
build-time memory-bound packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
== Summary ==
Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
that is a filtered view of Flathub.
== Detailed Description ==
'Note that this proposal is about user experience, procedures, and
technology
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Third_Party_Software_Mechanism
== Summary ==
Update mechanism for opting-in to "Third-Party Software Repositories"
so that the repositories are immediately enabled.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:otaylor| Owen Taylor]]
* Email: otay...@redhat.com
== Detailed
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
== Summary ==
Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
[https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
memory-constraints]), for optionally limiting build parallelism for
build-time memory-bound packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
== Summary ==
Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
that is a filtered view of Flathub.
== Detailed Description ==
'Note that this proposal is about user experience, procedures, and
technology
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Third_Party_Software_Mechanism
== Summary ==
Update mechanism for opting-in to "Third-Party Software Repositories"
so that the repositories are immediately enabled.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:otaylor| Owen Taylor]]
* Email: otay...@redhat.com
== Detailed
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> >the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> >rebuilds. I'm soliciting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977466
Bug ID: 1977466
Summary: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies
Keywords:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:21 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues
> with this proposed
According to upstream, they are not going to deprecate GOPATH yet in this
version.
I built etcd with 1.17beta1 and everything went fine.
> On 29 Jun 2021, at 20:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On 6/28/21 6:57 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.17
>>
On 6/28/21 6:57 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.17
== Summary ==
Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.17 in Fedora 35,
including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release
version of Go will be used for the rebuild if released version
On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues
with this proposed approach.
How do you
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.25
== Summary ==
IBus 1.5.25 will use `transfiletriggerin` script to generate the cache
file instead of `posttrans` script in each engine package, support the
include directive in the user compose file, IBus compose feature will
follow the GTK4
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 2:07 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: If glibc 2.34 provides too disruptive to
> compiling the distribution we could revert to 2.33, but given that
> Rawhide has started tracking glibc 2.34, no show-stopper problems are
> expected.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF35
== Summary ==
Switch the Fedora 35 GNU Toolchain to gcc 11 (lastest point release),
binutils 2.37, and glibc 2.34.
The gcc 11 is already included in Fedora 34, but the release will be
updated to the latest point release. The glibc 2.34
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.25
== Summary ==
IBus 1.5.25 will use `transfiletriggerin` script to generate the cache
file instead of `posttrans` script in each engine package, support the
include directive in the user compose file, IBus compose feature will
follow the GTK4
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF35
== Summary ==
Switch the Fedora 35 GNU Toolchain to gcc 11 (lastest point release),
binutils 2.37, and glibc 2.34.
The gcc 11 is already included in Fedora 34, but the release will be
updated to the latest point release. The glibc 2.34
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 16:11 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Hello!
>
> is this meeting on Libera or Freenode, the email says Freenode but i think
> thats a copy paste error right?
Sorry I didn't spot the error or the replies in time; of course the
meeting was on libera.chat. I again forgot to
On 24. 06. 21 18:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 06. 21 19:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
To compensate a rather ugly scriptlet is needed. The changes were proposed:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-psutil/pull-request/10
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2-cairo/pull-request/1
The
On 24. 06. 21 18:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 06. 21 19:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
To compensate a rather ugly scriptlet is needed. The changes were proposed:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-psutil/pull-request/10
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2-cairo/pull-request/1
The
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:36:36AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > > the composes more
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/199 (x86_64), 2/138 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210628.n.0):
ID: 918876 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210628.0):
ID: 919197 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/919197
ID: 919201 Test: x86_64
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-06-30 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210628.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210629.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 36
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 37.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages
In one week, or slightly later, I will update python-pyrsistent to
0.18.0 in Rawhide (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977038).
This includes one minor API change; please see the release notes at
In one week, or slightly later, I will update python-pyrsistent to
0.18.0 in Rawhide (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977038).
This includes one minor API change; please see the release notes at
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:52 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok"
> > > wrote:
> > > >On 24. 06. 21
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210629.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:48 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021, at 5:16 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > Greetings from the Fedora source-git SIG! We are planning to start
> > publishing reports of what we are working on so everyone can easily
> > pay attention and get involved if
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:48:54PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24. 06. 21 11:16, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > > ## Choosing git forge to host source-git
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:09 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:43:48 -0400
> Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:33 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:55:21 -0400
> > > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:14 PM Till Maas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> > rebuilds. I'm
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> > rebuilds. I'm
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-06-30 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
There are no nominated bugs and the two open bugs are being actively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977103
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977273
Bug ID: 1977273
Summary: perl-XML-TreeBuilder for EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-TreeBuilder
Assignee: rland...@redhat.com
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.33 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/7
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.33 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/7
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 22:34 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Joan Moreau via devel [26/06/2021 19:36] :
> >
> > What is next ?
>
> The answer is the same one you were given two months ago.
>
> You need to seek out a sponsor:
>
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210628.0):
ID: 918812 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
> I submitted a pull request that mashes your patch, Colin Walter's
> earlier pull reuqest, and some stuff I had worked on before into
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20047.
Ok. Thanks, but you meant https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20058 :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976544
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nott...@splat.cc|p...@city-fan.org
--
You are
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.33 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976544
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Depends On|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Simple` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Simple/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.33 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977021
--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Changes in new version: Allow `can` method to respond to delegated methods
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977021
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Dne 26. 06. 21 v 19:16 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
The process is complicated for multiple reasons:
1. There are a lot of steps to deal with corner cases which have come
up over the years which need to be dealt with.
2. There are some steps to make sure that the package is going to be
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 04:39:16PM -, Paweł Marciniak wrote:
> I've written a code heavily based on the above-mentioned PR:15957 but I've
> added some missing code (new option StatusUnitFormat=combined).
>
> Now you can set StatusUnitFormat=combined in the configuration file or as a
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #17 from
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:43:48 -0400
Mohan Boddu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:33 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:55:21 -0400
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > > the composes more reliable if
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Simple` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Simple/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210628.0):
ID: 918796 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Am 28.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
The semantics is quite simple:
%check
%py3_check_import mymodule mymodule.submodule
Looks great! Thank you.
Please let us know when we should start adding that to our Python packages. :-)
Felix
Am 28.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
The semantics is quite simple:
%check
%py3_check_import mymodule mymodule.submodule
Looks great! Thank you.
Please let us know when we should start adding that to our Python packages. :-)
Felix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977103
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/29/report-389-ds-base-2.0.6-20210629gitc0ca290ff.fc34.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
78 matches
Mail list logo
