On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 09:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't think autoconf-archive is usually actually used in builds, the
> package sources generally contain the macros.
Hi,
that's why I mentioned the libpst runs autoreconf [1]. I can be wrong
though, I thought the autoreconf
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:20 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> The former owner appears to also be the upstream, so they might be
> back, but at least in the meantime, do you want to take it now that
> it's building again?
Hi,
I'm not sure I'm the best person, I do not follow the
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > prusa-slicer - Expects openvdb to use IlmBase::Half
>>
>> That one should be fixed.
>>
>
> Could very well be that my notes are stale.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990679
Bug ID: 1990679
Summary: perl-IO-Async-0.79 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Async
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Petr Menšík wrote:
> No, that is the reason why I proposed it. Guidelines already state
> *-filesystem packages does not have to be depended on [1]. Just one,
> probably systemd or systemd-libs, should depend on it to get it
> installed. All other can then just ignore the directory exactly as you
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:02 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Wait .. there's a download at pypi.org? Why?
>
> Oh, to make it easier to integrate into django projects. Hmmm. Okay,
> I'll check out that pypi.org tarball and think about this. Aleksei
> suggested having a 5 somewhere in the name, since
On 8/5/21 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
>> Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below.
>>
>> On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200,
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 17:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > libpst
>
> Hi,
> I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it,
The package was orphaned yesterday as part of this progress. The former owner
appears to also
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 13:39 -0400 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz:
> On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 18:39 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> > > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > libpst
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 18:39 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > libpst
> >
> > Hi,
> > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but
>
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > prusa-slicer - Expects openvdb to use IlmBase::Half
>
> That one should be fixed.
>
Could very well be that my notes are stale. Lots of moving parts to this
update :)
Thanks,
Richard
This is just a note that luminance-hdr did move to openexr2, and will
remain there for the foreseeable future—unless somebody writes a
nontrivial patch for 3.x support, or the recently-absent upstream picks
up development again. The curious may consult
On 05. 08. 21 19:01, Richard Shaw wrote:
prusa-slicer - Expects openvdb to use IlmBase::Half
That one should be fixed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 15:33:18 +0800, Xiao Ni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough.
> > If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess
> > you'll need to file a ticket with
Current status:
aqsis - Move to openexr2
bcd - Moved to openexr2
blender - seems to be failing for Python related issue
calligra - Moved to openexr2, FTBFS for FontConfig reasons
CTL - Moved to openexr2
darktable -done
Field3D - done
freeimage - done
gegl04 - done
gimp
gmic - done
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below.
>
> On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> >> Hi Zbyszek,
> >>
> >> thanks for
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 17:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > libpst
>
> Hi,
> I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but
> looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python
> binary. Digging
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > libpst
>
> Hi,
> I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but
> looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python
> binary.
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING:
Hey folks,
One of the initiatives the CPE team has taken over this quarter is updating
and improving the performances of datagrepper/datanomer.
That work is based upon the investigation done earlier in the year whose
results can be found at:
Hey folks,
One of the initiatives the CPE team has taken over this quarter is updating
and improving the performances of datagrepper/datanomer.
That work is based upon the investigation done earlier in the year whose
results can be found at:
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> libpst
Hi,
I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but
looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python
binary. Digging deeper, in the autoconf-archive-2021.02.19-2.fc35, the
ax_python.m4
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 10:13 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:38 PM Kyle Knoepfel
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree
> > with the version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting
> > a new epel7 package
I've taken and am fixing libprelude.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, August 5th, 2021 at 7:00
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:38 PM Kyle Knoepfel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree with the
> version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting a new epel7 package
> jsonnet.
>
> Bodhi update:
>
Depends on how many maintainers should fix their package, more below.
On 8/4/21 4:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 10:27:10AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
>> Hi Zbyszek,
>>
>> thanks for your comment. Wouldn't it be much clearer instead of turning
>> bind eye on
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 03:33:18PM +0800, Xiao Ni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough.
> > If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess
> > you'll need to file a ticket
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210804.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210805.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 143
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.25 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> Hi,
> the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week
> will
> contain a soname version bump of a libcamel library due to ABI
> changes.
> A simple rebuild should be enough for the other packages.
>
>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:22 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Kaleb Keithley:
>>
>> > ah, I missed that. I looked, but not hard enough apparently, and I
>> presumed it was related
>> > to changes in the code.
>> >
>> >
Hello,
here are the packages that should be retired according to the policy one week
before the beta freeze, that is on 2021-08-17.
If you see a pacakge that you would rather fix than retire, please assign the
bugzilla (move it to ASSIGNED or higher) and start working on the fix.
Hello,
here are the packages that should be retired according to the policy one week
before the beta freeze, that is on 2021-08-17.
If you see a pacakge that you would rather fix than retire, please assign the
bugzilla (move it to ASSIGNED or higher) and start working on the fix.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:46:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > > LINUX KERNEL --
> > > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel
On 05. 08. 21 11:03, Sahana Prasad wrote:
Hello everyone,
As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on 2021-08-10.
I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3] (along
with devel subpackage) into rawhide.
I would like your opinion/suggestion on:
1.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210804.0):
ID: 941509 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi,
the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week will
contain a soname version bump of a libcamel library due to ABI changes.
A simple rebuild should be enough for the other packages.
According to `dnf repoquery --whatrequires libcamel-1.2.so* --alldeps`
there are
Hello everyone,
As per the F36 schedule [1], rawhide starts F36 development on 2021-08-10.
I would like to bring in OpenSSL 3.0.0 [2] and the compat package [3]
(along with devel subpackage) into rawhide.
I would like your opinion/suggestion on:
1. Merging it and building it directly in rawhide.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210804.0):
ID: 941380 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough.
> If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess
> you'll need to file a ticket with infra so they can look at why your new
> key isn't working.
Hi
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:46:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > LINUX KERNEL --
> > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use
> > of Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can
Dne 05. 08. 21 v 2:42 Michel Alexandre Salim via devel napsal(a):
This is now implemented on Rawhide; Fedora updates are in testing:
Where is it documented?
I suggest one of these
https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
Miroslav
41 matches
Mail list logo
