Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Dne 31. 01. 22 v 20:39 Adam Williamson napsal(a): but very soon I discovered that documentation of PolicyKit is nearly non-existent. At least, it is not sufficient to do the migration. After reading the code I found that it is likely missing functionality of consolehelper. I had a discussion

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On 1/31/22 21:15, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:19 PM Steve Grubb wrote: >> >> Hello Mirek, >> >> This is the most constructive reply I've seen in this thread. >> >> On Monday, January 31, 2022 1:12:50 PM EST Miloslav Trmac wrote: But doesn't satisfy our security

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:19 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello Mirek, > > This is the most constructive reply I've seen in this thread. > > On Monday, January 31, 2022 1:12:50 PM EST Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > > But doesn't satisfy our security requirements. If the kernel dbus project > > > had been

[Bug 2046600] perl-App-cpanminus-1.7045 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046600 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6395a45cb3 perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4069001f10 miniupnpc-2.0-3.el7 The following builds

[Bug 2043397] perl-Email-Abstract for EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 5:24 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello Mirek, > > This is the most constructive reply I've seen in this thread. > > On Monday, January 31, 2022 1:12:50 PM EST Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > > But doesn't satisfy our security requirements. If the kernel dbus project > > > had been

[Bug 2038239] Please branch and build perl-Test-Pod-LinkCheck for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038239 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2041077] Please build perl-Net-XMPP for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041077 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2038059] perl-CGI-Compile for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038059 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2033601] Add perl-Geo-Distance to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033601 Bug 2033601 depends on bug 2033614, which changed state. Bug 2033614 Summary: Add perl-GIS-Distance to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033614 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2042872] Please branch and build perl-bareword-filehandles for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042872 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812 Bug 2031812 depends on bug 2038059, which changed state. Bug 2038059 Summary: perl-CGI-Compile for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038059 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2032428] perl-RDF-Trine for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032428 Bug 2032428 depends on bug 2033630, which changed state. Bug 2033630 Summary: Add perl-IRI for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033630 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2032426] perl-RDF-Query for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032426 Bug 2032426 depends on bug 2033601, which changed state. Bug 2033601 Summary: Add perl-Geo-Distance to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033601 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2033601] Add perl-Geo-Distance to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2042871] Please branch and build perl-multidimensional for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042871 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2041248] perl-XML-Stream for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041248 Bug 2041248 depends on bug 2042595, which changed state. Bug 2042595 Summary: perl-HTTP-ProxyAutoConfig for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042595 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2033630] Add perl-IRI for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033630 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2042595] perl-HTTP-ProxyAutoConfig for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-ProxyAutoConfig-0

[Bug 2032428] perl-RDF-Trine for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032428 Bug 2032428 depends on bug 2038180, which changed state. Bug 2038180 Summary: Add perl-XML-CommonNS to EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038180 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2038180] Add perl-XML-CommonNS to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038180 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2041077] Please build perl-Net-XMPP for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041077 Bug 2041077 depends on bug 2041247, which changed state. Bug 2041247 Summary: perl-LWP-Online for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041247 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2041247] perl-LWP-Online for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041247 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2047875] Please branch and build perl-Socket-MsgHdr for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047875 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from

Re: search among all spec files

On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 01:03 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs > files, in order to read some example of usage. > Is that possible? For example cloning the whole git repository. > also you got sourcegraph

[Bug 2043770] perl-Net-HTTP-6.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043770 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Hello Mirek, This is the most constructive reply I've seen in this thread. On Monday, January 31, 2022 1:12:50 PM EST Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > But doesn't satisfy our security requirements. If the kernel dbus project > > had been successful, then Linux would have had a rock solid basis to > >

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-01)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-02-01 18:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

[EPEL-devel] Re: Revisiting policy for limited arch packages?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 06:48:21PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems. > > At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we > > switched to 'add a 0 to

Re: search among all spec files

Check https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/, specifically https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz. This covers Rawhide only, of course. On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, at 7:03 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: > Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs

Re: search among all spec files

On 01. 02. 22 1:03, Germano Massullo wrote: Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs files, in order to read some example of usage. Is that possible? For example cloning the whole git repository. This tarball contains all Rawhide spec files, updated I believe

Re: search among all spec files

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:03:22AM +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs > files, in order to read some example of usage. > Is that possible? For example cloning the whole git repository. Well, each package is it's own git repo,

search among all spec files

Good day. I have to search gcc-toolset among all Fedora packages specs files, in order to read some example of usage. Is that possible? For example cloning the whole git repository. Best regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

> * Jakub Jelinek: > > > I think Kevin has posted a GDB patch for the crash: > > [PATCH] Fix GDB internal error by using text (instead of data) section > offset > > > The bug was exposed by the loss of the .data

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Lennart Poettering writes: See the discussion around seccomp and NNP. i.e. a new kernel facility was added precisely to ensure that seccomp cannot be used to run code that is intended to be run privileged – under security policies in control by an unprivileged user. i.e. if you can take certain

Re: conditional require

On 31. 01. 22 23:51, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/31/22 05:08 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/31/22 04:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 22 21:58, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: During recent major version update, some files were moved from -doc to , and as a result updates of fail

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Demi Marie Obenour writes: What would break if sudo was replaced by an IPC service that ran sudo as if it was setuid root, without it actually being setuid root? I imagine the hardest part would be TTY handling, as not being able to Ctrl-C a command launched by sudo is a rather poor user

Re: conditional require

On 1/31/22 05:08 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/31/22 04:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 22 21:58, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: During recent major version update, some files were moved from -doc to , and as a result updates of fail due to a file conflict. Manual update of -doc

Weirdness with clang and stdatomic.h on Rawhide

Hey all, I’m troubleshooting an issue and came up with this sample program: https://pastebin.com/g9S8Z64q to demonstrate the problem. Basically, clang 13, on Rawhide, won’t compile that program, while on Fedora 35 it does. The reason why is that on Rawhide, stdatomic.h exists under

tdawson pushed to perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 22:05:32 UTC From 32243a25b9273cdb5fd1f4ad6e618acca969392e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 22:05:26 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Validation-Class (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 22:04:37 UTC From 0d7c0fe8cea03f0a94a395c5d21c2eaf52ffefa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 22:04:32 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Type-Tie (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 22:01:47 UTC From dafb1574511285547368f268c0c712411ec19536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 22:01:41 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 22:01:19 UTC From 656426abcc5af00e03ca41330604d2eb255104af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 22:01:13 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: conditional require

On 1/31/22 04:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 01. 22 21:58, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: During recent major version update, some files were moved from -doc to , and as a result updates of fail due to a file conflict. Manual update of -doc resolves this, of course. A simple solution

tdawson pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:46:03 UTC From 3edfcb976de0b91d42df55b86344a71ac04bfe86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:45:57 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:43:49 UTC From 6f607bc46aa855369967b11229ffe258297a21e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:43:43 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:43:40 UTC From 4b425a7d2c6ad7e162a9e25d3e96f721d2af2fbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:43:34 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:40:02 UTC From f027a48917ac0d7cf419bdfe92eac199fc275098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:39:56 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Return-Type (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:37:39 UTC From cebc72a67530e15c8870c721d305988778d34377 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:37:33 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: How to handle a few files moving from one package to another?

On 1/31/22 04:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: When updating from KiCad 5 to KiCad 6, a few files have moved from the kicad-doc package to the main kicad package. If someone has KiCad 5 and its documentation package installed, and then

tdawson pushed to perl-namespace-sweep (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:24:01 UTC From 3b13b114c25b112ece52f4777408954d9695bcaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:23:55 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: How to handle a few files moving from one package to another?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > > When updating from KiCad 5 to KiCad 6, a few files have moved from the > kicad-doc package to the main kicad package. > > If someone has KiCad 5 and its documentation package installed, and then > tries to just upgrade the main package

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

* Robbie Harwood: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > >> 1. pc(5) talks about "package", as if one would want to link to a >>whole "package" instead one of the specific library files provided >>by a package. Thankfully most .pc files only list one "-l" in Libs. >>

tdawson pushed to perl-Module-Extract-Use (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:17:26 UTC From 235d4de8e47964bf714b1fab054bf0073575d526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:17:20 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:14:48 UTC From ea8bb8c09ffc35dbbed098c35ba718afe68dff12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:14:41 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:13:34 UTC From e7f91ff07e0b5c8c1637244b30d41009aadc0d1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:13:28 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Mail-Message (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:13:14 UTC From 1eb5047b4b27d0532820e6c2280ec592e4765838 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:13:08 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: conditional require

Thanks all! I'll use the Conflicts approach. Steve On 1/31/22 04:06 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: In similar situations I've used something like Conflicts: package-doc < 6.0.0 On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 16:01 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: You just asked the same question that I did. :-) I

tdawson pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:06:56 UTC From 9a830039d3010c8915afe535d18c163277209d4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:06:50 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

[Bug 2047875] Please branch and build perl-Socket-MsgHdr for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047875 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from

Re: conditional require

In similar situations I've used something like Conflicts: package-doc < 6.0.0 On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 16:01 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > You just asked the same question that I did. :-) > > I think the Obsoletes line is correct. Once I get a ruling on that > from the experts, I'll add it to

tdawson pushed to perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:04:07 UTC From be401cdfb90c2fae0edfff4b3cbaf0d998a52fb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:04:00 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: conditional require

On 31. 01. 22 21:58, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: During recent major version update, some files were moved from -doc to , and as a result updates of fail due to a file conflict. Manual update of -doc resolves this, of course. A simple solution would be to declare that Required:

tdawson pushed to perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 21:03:38 UTC From f05618b74ce6e62859ea05ac886bc2674107b39a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 21:03:32 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: conditional require

You just asked the same question that I did. :-) I think the Obsoletes line is correct. Once I get a ruling on that from the experts, I'll add it to the package. Steve On 1/31/22 03:58 PM, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: During recent major version update, some files were moved

conditional require

During recent major version update, some files were moved from -doc to , and as a result updates of fail due to a file conflict. Manual update of -doc resolves this, of course. A simple solution would be to declare that Required: package-doc >= 6.0.0 but that would force the install of

How to handle a few files moving from one package to another?

When updating from KiCad 5 to KiCad 6, a few files have moved from the kicad-doc package to the main kicad package. If someone has KiCad 5 and its documentation package installed, and then tries to just upgrade the main package to KiCad 6 (without also updating the docs), they get an error

tdawson pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 20:31:24 UTC From 103cd34d86db180ade40f3eb9e34db5401a1e09c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 20:31:18 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

tdawson pushed to perl-Cookie-Baker (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 20:29:07 UTC From 08b8eabd8bdd2bf293e29aa6be4bc6659aa55c46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 20:29:00 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Tomasz Torcz wrote: >On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> >> But yes, for Windows releases ≥ 95 OSR 2 and < 10 (and no, Windows version >> numbers are not anywhere near monotonic ;-) ), MSVCRT is included out of the >> box, UCRT is not. Is it really a good

tdawson pushed to perl-Class-Std-Fast (epel8-playground). "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 20:23:48 UTC From d9876e7764bebf965357c167c353aeaea1fa6cd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Troy Dawson Date: Jan 31 2022 20:23:42 + Subject: epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/136 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

[Bug 2046802] perl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046802 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dho...@redhat.com --- Comment #6

[EPEL-devel] epel8-playground branch retires - happening now

Hello, I am currently in the middle of retiring all of the epel8-playground branches. I apologize for not sending an email ahead of time. For informations sake, I am retiring them with fedpkg retire "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/ 136" Just so people know

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

Robbie Harwood wrote: > k5crypto and com_err are internal libraries used across the different > interfaces krb5 provides - they're not intended for external > consumption, and upstream doesn't support their direct use by other > applications. Then they belong in Libs.private, not Libs. > So

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Well, that is the reverse of how we do things in general. If I want to > look for libraries using pkg-config, I install pkg-config. If I want > to look for libraries using 'gcc test.c -lfoo', then I install gcc. > > What we have now is like saying that .h files

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 16:00 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 27. 01. 22 v 0:18 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > BTW, bonus follow-up to this: as part of researching the background of > > polkit, I noticed that we never actually entirely got done moving off > > usermode:( There are still over a

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 10:19 +, Michael J Gruber wrote: > I vaguely remember we had a move off consolekit at some point: In 2016, I > moved "luckybackup" away from "beesu" (which uses consolekit) to "pkexec" > (from polkit). > > We still have "beesu" in Fedora. Should I switch back? ;) No.

[Bug 2047875] Please branch and build perl-Socket-MsgHdr for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047875 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f | |r)

Re: Intent to orphan gnu-efi

On 31 Jan 2022 13:20, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Al Stone writes: > > > I may be interested in picking this up. I've been doing some UEFI > > dev work on Fedora. Let me take a look at the package and let you > > know in a day or two or three. Anything I should watch out for if > > I do decide to

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 31. 01. 22 v 14:09 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >Hi, > > > >various .pc files that we ship contain a lot of stuff in the Libs and > >Libs.private field don't make much sense to me. I started looking at > >the

Re: the meaning of pkgconfig's Libs fields

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > 3. We autogenerate a dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config for -devel. > > Logic is reversed here: the -devel package **provides** something > > that it consumed by pkg-config. Dependencies

[Bug 2043397] perl-Email-Abstract for EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Message (epel9). "EPEL-9 post-bootstrap rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 19:00:03 UTC From 3c25c6a4b480e1bb0b76c8a0c845473336819501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jan 26 2022 11:50:15 + Subject: EPEL-9 post-bootstrap rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec b/perl-Mail-Message.spec index

[EPEL-devel] Re: Revisiting policy for limited arch packages?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems. > At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we > switched to 'add a 0 to release so the rhel package always gets > installed in favor of it'. It

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

So, going over FTBFS bugs I've seen against bunch of my packages since the mass rebuild, there is bunch of "undefined reference to `std::type_info::operator==(std::type_info const&) const'" returned by ld, affecting only armv7hl arch. The affected packages are: mozjs68, mozjs78, mozjs91. I've

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:43 UTC From 0e1788e97740672effdf63864d812827e46954c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 30 2020 01:56:42 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:43 UTC From b8044c1f264c21d9f23952e1fbc30670b7370022 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 25 2020 13:04:47 + Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Mail-Transport.spec b/perl-Mail-Transport.spec index

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "3.005"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:43 UTC From dd46d0973fab88525a5e1b49817aa348379cf54f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Jul 31 2020 15:25:34 + Subject: 3.005 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b713ac6..185a4a3 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "3.004 bump"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From b07e72230161801772852c683b4a05c9e2e28519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 06 2019 09:04:23 + Subject: 3.004 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a586bf5..b713ac6 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "Spec tidy-up (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:43 UTC From c6b3215f0113c444223960d1d97a31fc024f2beb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Oct 18 2019 08:42:24 + Subject: Spec tidy-up - Use author-independent source URL - Classify buildreqs by usage - Drop redundant use of

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "3.003"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From 0ddea0155a0bbe797e2088e45dfc2ff58c6deb96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Sep 05 2018 17:25:06 + Subject: 3.003 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 8846b49..a586bf5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:43 UTC From 79871d8b57a171dcdb561398602110c52b8b8382 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 28 2020 16:55:54 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From 8bb25e507b5d6f3a9c6f200ca1bb79898931d887 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 26 2019 04:28:31 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From 677603ac7d6f345702d7345567869a999c2fdfbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 31 2019 14:11:31 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Mail-Transport.spec b/perl-Mail-Transport.spec index

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From 6f69f11b83462922e5eb7741889bf91c6028d4a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 01 2019 22:04:47 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From 6215e1679a0fee6c0334fd6c4e9f0b49f26db870 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:06:16 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From 2eec826ce4fa3fb3c966464090b585a4cf0c460f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:13:59 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "Remove obsolete Group tag (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From f7582e43e2e844e80d5fb381de07dc6a02ac39e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Igor Gnatenko Date: Jan 28 2019 19:24:30 + Subject: Remove obsolete Group tag References: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Group_Tag --- diff --git

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-31 18:40:42 UTC From cc602fcdbd7ad223c4d9954e5132f034bde11c8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 13 2018 18:22:38 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

  1   2   >