It's very disappointing that Fedora will now be permanently crippled for a huge
amount of video content. If Red Hat is largely alone in believing that this a
credible legal risk, then ultimately this change will reflect poorly on the
distribution regardless of any articles written.
I hope this
On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:31:11 -0600
"Chris Murphy" wrote:
[..]
> >> The obvious bike-shedding questions are:
> >> Is 4G is too much or too little? If so what amount it should be?
> >> Is size still the correct approach? Or should we consider a max
> >> retention time? And if so, what would it be
On Sat Sep 24, 2022, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Sep 6, 2022, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> > The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`, `yum-utils`,
> > and DNF plugins (core and extras). python3-dnf and LIBDNF (`libdnf`,
> > `python3-hawkey`) will be
We shipped https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainer in
Fedora 36 and a lot has happened since then.
One of the biggest things is that rpm-ostree now knows how to intelligently
generate reproducible "chunked" container images.
I'll describe this by also highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-00fc32f686 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128614
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f526a1b8b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b5a83114ee has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f526a1b8b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-235b2c7b43 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 27.9.2022 klo 10.41:
Dne 27. 09. 22 v 9:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 22:20 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
On a different level, Sourcegraph is an effective way to query the
package sources. For instance, just querying for string 'rexml'
reveals that the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 5:53 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 9/27/22 2:36 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > The implicit IANAL is very clear here.
>
> I wish you had started the discussion the legal list yourself prior to the
> git commit.
>
> A certain website that monitors this mailing list is
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:53 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 9/27/22 2:36 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > The implicit IANAL is very clear here.
>
> I wish you had started the discussion the legal list yourself prior to the
> git commit.
>
> A certain website that monitors this mailing list is
On 9/27/22 2:36 PM, David Airlie wrote:
The implicit IANAL is very clear here.
I wish you had started the discussion the legal list yourself prior to the git
commit.
A certain website that monitors this mailing list is probably already preparing to
post how Fedora 37 is no longer going to
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:36:01 +1000
David Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 5:34 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > On 9/27/22 1:56 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > > The patent licensing around H264/H265 is such that providing this
> > > could leave Red Hat and other Fedora distributors
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 5:34 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 9/27/22 1:56 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > The patent licensing around H264/H265 is such that providing this
> > could leave Red Hat and other Fedora distributors exposed to legal
> > problems.
>
> How is Mesa violating H264/H265
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 5:11 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, David Airlie said:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 AM Frantisek Zatloukal
> > wrote:
> > > since this mesa change (
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide
On 9/27/22 1:56 PM, David Airlie wrote:
The patent licensing around H264/H265 is such that providing this
could leave Red Hat and other Fedora distributors exposed to legal
problems.
How is Mesa violating H264/H265 patents? Mesa wasn't performing any patented
functionality.
If simply
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 8:11 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, David Airlie said:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 AM Frantisek Zatloukal
> > wrote:
> > > since this mesa change (
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide
Once upon a time, David Airlie said:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 AM Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
> > since this mesa change (
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide
> > ) in F37 and rawhide, the mesa package lost support for
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> since this mesa change (
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide
> ) in F37 and rawhide, the mesa package lost support for vaapi accelerated
> encoding and
Hi,
On September 27, 2022 6:13:48 PM UTC, Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
>
>On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 10:59 AM, Gregory Bartholomew wrote:
>>>
>>> What about modifying /etc/systemd/journald.conf:
>>>
>>> MaxFileSec=1week
>>> MaxRetentionSec=5week
>>>
>>> This should result in at least 4 weeks of
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 12:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:12:57AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fedora uses systemd-journald for system logging. By default it is a
>> persistent log kept on /var, and uses up to 4G disk space, although
>> in certain
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 10:59 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I hadn't considered the container case at all, that containers running
> systemd-journald would have their own journals and retention policy. I wonder
> if the
> container default should have volatile journals? Or forward the journals
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-09-27/fesco.2022-09-27-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-09-27/fesco.2022-09-27-17.00.txt
Log:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 10:59 AM, Gregory Bartholomew wrote:
>>
>> What about modifying /etc/systemd/journald.conf:
>>
>> MaxFileSec=1week
>> MaxRetentionSec=5week
>>
>> This should result in at least 4 weeks of journal entries, i.e. it would
>> delete a journal
>> file once entries reach 5
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:12:57AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora uses systemd-journald for system logging. By default it is a
> persistent log kept on /var, and uses up to 4G disk space, although
> in certain circumstances it can go a bit higher. See 'man journald.conf'
> for
Hi,
since this mesa change (
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide
) in F37 and rawhide, the mesa package lost support for vaapi accelerated
encoding and decoding of h264, h265 and decoding of vc1 (
On 27. 09. 22 17:55, Sandro wrote:
On 27-09-2022 08:17, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Make sure that the build does not use the pyx file from upstream. It
seems to me that the file generated by Cython is in the source tarball
(skmisc/loess/src/_loess.pyx) and I did not find any mention of use of
Cython
>
> What about modifying /etc/systemd/journald.conf:
>
> MaxFileSec=1week
> MaxRetentionSec=5week
>
> This should result in at least 4 weeks of journal entries, i.e. it would
> delete a journal
> file once entries reach 5 weeks old, but since the journal files are rotated
> weekly, it
>
OLD: Fedora-37-20220926.n.1
NEW: Fedora-37-20220927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 10:38 AM, Gregory Bartholomew wrote:
> FWIW (probably not much), I have run into an issue with regard to the
> default journal size being too large on Fedora Server when running a
> bunch of systemd-nspawn containers each with sshd and fail2ban enabled.
> When I
Dear all,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.libera.chat.
>
> Change: pcre deprecation
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2862
> APPROVED (+3,
FWIW (probably not much), I have run into an issue with regard to the default
journal size being too large on Fedora Server when running a bunch of
systemd-nspawn containers each with sshd and fail2ban enabled. When I reboot a
bunch of the containers at once (or the whole hypervisor), fail2ban
Hi,
Fedora uses systemd-journald for system logging. By default it is a persistent
log kept on /var, and uses up to 4G disk space, although in certain
circumstances it can go a bit higher. See 'man journald.conf' for details.
Example:
>Sep 27 07:26:05 fovo.local systemd-journald[602]: System
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2022-09-28 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
On 27-09-2022 08:17, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Make sure that the build does not use the pyx file from upstream. It
seems to me that the file generated by Cython is in the source tarball
(skmisc/loess/src/_loess.pyx) and I did not find any mention of use of
Cython in the build log. The file is
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220926.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 110
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.84 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-09-27 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hi everyone,
here is a short summary of the status of "ELF package notes" in Fedora,
and a call for ideas what to do next.
History: the original implementation that was approved for F36 used a
linker script that injected a section in the ELF file with JSON text.
This was causing build issues
Hello,
$SUBJ does contain a lot of fixes.
Please test the upgrade here if you can:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-88eae95f8a
Let me know if something is wrong.
_ _ _ _
# How to test
1) install the package
2) reinstall / upgrade kernel-core
3) reboot
4) in case of
The guidelines have more info:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_using_cython
On 27. 09. 22 8:17, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hi Sandro.
Make sure that the build does not use the pyx file from upstream. It
seems to me that the file generated by Cython is in the
Dne 27. 09. 22 v 9:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 22:20 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Robby Callicotte via devel kirjoitti 26.9.2022 klo 21.52:
I will also close
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129584 since
this is already in ruby. I simply did a search in
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 22:20 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Robby Callicotte via devel kirjoitti 26.9.2022 klo 21.52:
I will also close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129584
since
this is already in ruby. I simply did a search in
src.fedoraproject.org and
did not see this package.
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 20:52 Robby Callicotte via devel napsal(a):
On Monday, September 26, 2022 2:41:14 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Robby,
Do you by a chance have repository, e.g. in Copr, of all the things you
eventually want import into Fedora? Or bugzilla tracker for kitchen-salt
/
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:09:15AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 4:13 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > > We are working on this and hope to have an update soon.
> > >
> >
> > Well, we just released the Beta and
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> For anybody who went and left feedback on the web sales site asking for
> Linux after my last email - a big thank you. I can't help but think it
> must have been a factor in the below.
>
> Linux systems (multiple!) are now available
Hi Sandro.
Make sure that the build does not use the pyx file from upstream. It
seems to me that the file generated by Cython is in the source tarball
(skmisc/loess/src/_loess.pyx) and I did not find any mention of use of
Cython in the build log. The file is probably generated by an older
47 matches
Mail list logo
