On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 08:14 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
>
> > Am 31.01.2023 um 23:39 schrieb Adam Williamson :
> >
> > Hey folks!
> >
> > I've sort of happened into doing some maintenance of fedora-comps over
> > the last few years. Something that bugs me while working on this is how
> > many
> Am 31.01.2023 um 23:39 schrieb Adam Williamson :
>
> Hey folks!
>
> I've sort of happened into doing some maintenance of fedora-comps over
> the last few years. Something that bugs me while working on this is how
> many "shopping list" groups we still have. I'm talking about things
> like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166193
Bug ID: 2166193
Summary: perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-ObjectDriver
Keywords: FutureFeature,
> On Jan 31, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> I've sort of happened into doing some maintenance of fedora-comps over
> the last few years. Something that bugs me while working on this is how
> many "shopping list" groups we still have. I'm talking about things
>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:06:25PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/31/23 11:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems that Koji supports this, but it need some configuration change. I
> > > have opened followup ticket
On 1/31/23 11:03, Maxwell G wrote:
On Tue Jan 31, 2023 at 15:01 +0200, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
Hi all,
Hi, Orion
Thanks for raising this question.
Indeed!
I wonder if it's possible to continue to update collections to the
newest versions anyway. If someone wants to use the collection version
On 1/31/23 11:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
It seems that Koji supports this, but it need some configuration change. I
have opened followup ticket here:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11254
Yeah, my first thought about this was that it
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:39:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
...snip...
>
> So, I'm wondering what folks think we should do with these. We could,
> of course, just get rid of them. But perhaps they are still of value to
> someone? Is anyone still "package shopping" via
Hey folks!
I've sort of happened into doing some maintenance of fedora-comps over
the last few years. Something that bugs me while working on this is how
many "shopping list" groups we still have. I'm talking about things
like the network-server group:
network-server
<_name>Network
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 17:23 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to mentor Hussein (FAS: blinxen) in learning to become a
> packager. He is a work colleague of mine. In particular, he's helping
> me
> getting libimagequant updated, which some time ago was ported to
> rust.
> As such,
On 1/31/23 14:00, Ben Cotton wrote:
As a result of concerns about how the re-vote on the frame pointers
Change, it makes sense to clarify the requirements for FESCo
re-considering rejected proposals. FESCo #action bcotton'ed in the 10
January meeting[1] to develop a proposal.
I have drafted a
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230130.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230131.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 159
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 4.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166133
Bug ID: 2166133
Summary: perl-experimental-0.031 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-experimental
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 17:23 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to mentor Hussein (FAS: blinxen) in learning to become a
> packager. He is a work colleague of mine. In particular, he's helping
> me
> getting libimagequant updated, which some time ago was ported to
> rust.
> As such,
As a result of concerns about how the re-vote on the frame pointers
Change, it makes sense to clarify the requirements for FESCo
re-considering rejected proposals. FESCo #action bcotton'ed in the 10
January meeting[1] to develop a proposal.
I have drafted a proposal that you can find as
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:14 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:36:52AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ocaml-dose3 orphan 2 weeks ago
> > ocaml-mccsorphan 2 weeks ago
> >
On 1/29/23 5:57 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Susi Lehtola wrote on 2023/01/29 17:13:
Hi,
does anyone know how to contact Rich Mattes? They maintain
libQGLViewer, which
was last updated five years ago
* Sun Aug 12 2018 Rich Mattes - 2.6.4-1
- Update to release 2.6.4, with upstream fix for
2023-01-31T14:05:11Z David Moreau-Simard :
Hi,
Answer in-line but I also want to extend an invititation to everyone here
to join #ansible-packaging on libera.chat (or #packaging:ansible.com on
Matrix) which is a low signal-to-noise ratio channel to talk about
Ansible packaging things such
2023-01-31T13:02:09Z Sagi Shnaidman :
Hi, Orion
Thanks for raising this question.
I use both ways - either ansible distro with all-inclusive, or ansible
(distro or "core") with specific collection installed separately when I
need a newer version of collection, for example. I wonder if it's
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 06:03:48PM +, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Jan 31, 2023 at 15:01 +0200, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> Hi all,
Note that some folks cc'ed are not subscribed to epel-devel, so it
probibly rejected their posts. :(
>
> > Hi, Orion
> > Thanks for raising this question.
>
>
On Tue Jan 31, 2023 at 15:01 +0200, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
Hi all,
> Hi, Orion
> Thanks for raising this question.
Indeed!
> I wonder if it's possible to continue to update collections to the
> newest versions anyway. If someone wants to use the collection version
> provided in "big ansible",
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:19:09AM +0100, Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added the package perl-generators-epel to EPEL 7/8/9. The package is
> adding the behavior provided in perl-generators-1.16.
>
> I created pull requests for epel-rpm-macros to add perl-generators-epel
> to EPEL
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> It seems that Koji supports this, but it need some configuration change. I
> have opened followup ticket here:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11254
Yeah, my first thought about this was that it might be too broad, but it
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 10:29 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> I finished checking for fallout from the gtest 1.13.0 update in Rawhide.
> The following packages built with GCC 13 but FTBFS with gtest-0.13.0 and
> have NOT been patched yet:
>
> abseil-cpp
As a reminder, F38 Changes should be testably complete by Tuesday 7
February. Change owners can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla
tracker to the MODIFIED state. (If it is 100% complete, you can set
the tracker it ON_QA).
In addition, F38 branches from Rawhide on 7 February. At that point,
As a reminder, F38 Changes should be testably complete by Tuesday 7
February. Change owners can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla
tracker to the MODIFIED state. (If it is 100% complete, you can set
the tracker it ON_QA).
In addition, F38 branches from Rawhide on 7 February. At that point,
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-02-01 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230131.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
I finished checking for fallout from the gtest 1.13.0 update in Rawhide.
The following packages built with GCC 13 but FTBFS with gtest-0.13.0 and
have NOT been patched yet:
abseil-cpp (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164154); this
one is a nontrivial regression that has been
Dne 26. 01. 23 v 9:43 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 19:34 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:45:35PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok
wrote:
On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Reading the thread, I was afraid this
On 31. 01. 23 13:12, Richard Hughes wrote:
Hey all,
I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the fwupd-efi
package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream maintainer, so
I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new release if there's
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 1 week, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since this
On 31. 01. 23 13:12, Richard Hughes wrote:
Hey all,
I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the fwupd-efi
package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream maintainer, so
I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new release if there's
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 03:37, Niklas Schnelle
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 19:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:14AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:24:21AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 1 week, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since this
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 1:12 PM Richard Hughes
wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the
> fwupd-efi package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream
> maintainer, so I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new
>
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:13:11 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> So, I'm wondering if we should have some kind of (at least
> semi-)coordinated plan for updating ansible collections in EPEL?
>
> My initial thought is we would sort of piggy back on to what the
> "ansible" community collection
Hey all,
I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the fwupd-efi
package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream maintainer, so
I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new release if there's
something that needs to be fixed to build a Fedora
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-01-31 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
The reasoning for this looks to be that the upstream Lexical-Var distribution
(which contains Lexical::Sub, and provides support for lexical exports in the
absence of native support, i.e. prior to 5.37.2)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I found
On 30. 01. 23 22:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 01. 23 21:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
When it does change I plan to rebuild the package in EPEL 8.
The following packages FTBFS:
kwin
It failed because it has an %if-%rhel-defined Patch :(
Trying again from a patched spec.
Done. Also needs a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165855
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Link ID|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165855
Bug ID: 2165855
Summary: Cleanup spec file for arm platform
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Coro
Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
Hi,
I added the package perl-generators-epel to EPEL 7/8/9. The package is
adding the behavior provided in perl-generators-1.16.
I created pull requests for epel-rpm-macros to add perl-generators-epel
to EPEL buildroot.
Pull Request
EPEL 7:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:36:52AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-dose3 orphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-mccsorphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-opam-file-formatorphan 2 weeks ago
After several attempts, Blender is finally available for EPEL9 as 3.3
LTS series. Major differences compared to its Fedora counterpart is the
minimal dependencies based on blender_lite.cmake[2] thus light version.
As the result, functions like Cycle Rendering will be unavailable but
Eevee,
On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 19:46 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:14AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:24:21AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:20, David Cantrell wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at
48 matches
Mail list logo
