Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Benson Muite kirjoitti 4.4.2023 klo 7.02: May also want to automatically track unofficial reviews by prospective packagers, perhaps even requiring a certain number of unofficial reviews for the sponsorship process to start. Yes, I think that the sponsorship process should be made more rigid,

Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

Dne 04. 04. 23 v 3:20 Richard Shaw napsal(a): WARNING: This is a small rant... np :) I decided to look up my packages on src.fedoraproject.org (I'm still not sure if it's showing me all packages I'm admin of, or just main admin) and start working through them

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Benson Muite kirjoitti 4.4.2023 klo 7.02: Thanks for this initiative Jakub. Automated builds on copr of packages proposed for review has been very helpful. I completely agree. Great work! Benson Muite kirjoitti 4.4.2023 klo 7.02: On 4/4/23 03:59, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: From this thread I

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Thanks for this initiative Jakub. Automated builds on copr of packages proposed for review has been very helpful. On 4/4/23 03:59, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Thank you all for the feedback. > >> The bottom line is that package reviews can be quite time consuming. I >> don't think the issue is with

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From 83a927005bb127ce8b6145182cc7dafcbcf91006 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 01 2022 00:28:52 + Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec index

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Upstream update to 7.900058. (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From c1c723ef596a1fcc55296069a7d6e71e809bf9b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Jun 27 2022 09:41:02 + Subject: Upstream update to 7.900058. Modernize spec file. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Convert license to SPDX."

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From b57e0b9e0b2a7af20c48d85c11d740763de41a91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Nov 28 2022 07:06:18 + Subject: Convert license to SPDX. --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec index

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Remove perl(MODULE_COMPAT), it will be replaced by generators"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From 40da4152a2e1ac0e39649e041550a28f0e4c6269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jan 13 2023 19:38:36 + Subject: Remove perl(MODULE_COMPAT), it will be replaced by generators --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Upstream update to 7.900059."

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From b89e53614294cc2e8b08dba11a0e409e87adb827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Apr 03 2023 15:36:24 + Subject: Upstream update to 7.900059. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 2f196ae..d722849 100644 ---

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From 4ec304ab6b648f706731e93386a012be35e5b966 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 22 2022 12:27:13 + Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Cleanup merger"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From 4e99052cd15f8d442b421dbeb75c4eb135c6339d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Apr 03 2023 17:13:52 + Subject: Cleanup merger --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec index

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f36). "Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-04 03:52:06 UTC From 5dc19f5aa9e9d5b80affe40dc4f351c200d40f4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 20 2023 07:34:35 + Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e0ec985df4 chromium-111.0.5563.146-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7be8f2df20 seamonkey-2.53.16-1.el7 The following

[Bug 2183880] perl-Test-Compile-3.2.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183880 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2182227] perl-Test-Compile-3.1.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182227 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e21cdf8758 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e21cdf8758 See also

[Bug 2183924] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230331.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

SPDX: Consistency of tools

WARNING: This is a small rant... I have tried to keep up with the emails on the devel list around this but I admit that I haven't been able to devote the time to GROK them all. I decided to look up my packages on src.fedoraproject.org (I'm still not sure if it's showing me all packages I'm admin

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Thank you all for the feedback. > The bottom line is that package reviews can be quite time consuming. I > don't think the issue is with sponsorship itself. Sorry Jason, I probably didn't communicate my idea as clearly as I should. My intention wasn't to assign sponsors to review tickets and

[Bug 2181733] perl-Archive-Tar-3.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181733 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: Orphaned: kitty

I'm packaging required go dependencies and I'll grab it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting canceled (2023-04-04)

We don't have any outstanding issues, so I am going to cancel the meeting tomorrow. I guess I can run the one next week. ;) = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Change: SPDX Licenses Phase 2 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2972 APPROVED (+6,0,-0) Nonresponsive maintainer: Ross Lagerwall -

Orphaned: kitty

The previous maintainer orphaned Kitty terminal package on 29th March 2023. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165819 https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Jason Tibbitts kirjoitti 3.4.2023 klo 20.09: Miroslav Suchý writes: In any case, what I wrote was the procedure I documented it when I set it up. If all of that documentation was lost, then I don't know what to say but that's not what was intended. I drove the change that made this happen.

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

> It absoletely does. ;) And it even allows us to retrospectively see how many packagers were sponsored in the last month/year/... https://gist.github.com/FrostyX/47defa18348fbb917e73d7b2e7660ca2 Fedora-messaging is awesome :-) On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:33 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr

Re: Future of encryption in Fedora

On Mon, Apr 3 2023 at 01:41:48 PM -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: This seems like exactly the kind of discussion that belongs on the devel list, not on a website that I have to remember to visit for updates. There is a notification bell in the right sidebar. Click it. ;)

Re: Future of encryption in Fedora

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:28:32PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > I just posted a thread on discussion.fedoraproject.org: > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/future-of-encryption-in-fedora/80397 > > to invite discussion of a requirements document and draft plan about what > we might do for

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 01:52:49PM -0500, Jason Tibbitts wrote: > > Miroslav Suchý writes: > > > No, I'm not saying that. Somebody has enough courage to open the > > package review, discuss it, get to the point that the package review > > was approved. But did not have the courage to reach

Re: redhat-lsb-core

On 4/3/23 04:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:15 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: I'm confused by the Requires for redhat-lsb-core. According to "dnf repoquery --requires redhat-lsb-core" there is no requirement for esmtp. But according to "dnf repoquery --whatrequires

Re: redhat-lsb-core

On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:15 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > > I'm confused by the Requires for redhat-lsb-core. > > According to "dnf repoquery --requires redhat-lsb-core" there is no > requirement for esmtp. But according to "dnf repoquery --whatrequires > esmtp", redhat-lsb-core does require

redhat-lsb-core

I'm confused by the Requires for redhat-lsb-core. According to "dnf repoquery --requires redhat-lsb-core" there is no requirement for esmtp. But according to "dnf repoquery --whatrequires esmtp", redhat-lsb-core does require esmtp. Perhaps there is some sort of transitive requirement that

Re: Node.js repackaging status and questions

On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 7:33 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 12:04 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > ... > > - This repackaging has been pushed to F37 too. Why, if this was a F38 > > change? > > I agree, this is unusual. Hi, Node.js maintainer here. The changes I was making to F38

Future of encryption in Fedora

I just posted a thread on discussion.fedoraproject.org: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/future-of-encryption-in-fedora/80397 to invite discussion of a requirements document and draft plan about what we might do for encrypting Fedora Workstation systems in the future. Please follow up

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f37). "Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 17:14:29 UTC From 5dc19f5aa9e9d5b80affe40dc4f351c200d40f4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 20 2023 07:34:35 + Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f37). "Upstream update to 7.900059."

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 17:14:29 UTC From b89e53614294cc2e8b08dba11a0e409e87adb827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Apr 03 2023 15:36:24 + Subject: Upstream update to 7.900059. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 2f196ae..d722849 100644 ---

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f37). "Remove perl(MODULE_COMPAT), it will be replaced by generators"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 17:14:29 UTC From 40da4152a2e1ac0e39649e041550a28f0e4c6269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jan 13 2023 19:38:36 + Subject: Remove perl(MODULE_COMPAT), it will be replaced by generators --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f37). "Convert license to SPDX."

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 17:14:29 UTC From b57e0b9e0b2a7af20c48d85c11d740763de41a91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Nov 28 2022 07:06:18 + Subject: Convert license to SPDX. --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec index

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f37). "Cleanup merger"

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 17:14:29 UTC From 4e99052cd15f8d442b421dbeb75c4eb135c6339d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Apr 03 2023 17:13:52 + Subject: Cleanup merger --- diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec index

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

> Miroslav Suchý writes: > No, I'm not saying that. Somebody has enough courage to open the > package review, discuss it, get to the point that the package review > was approved. But did not have the courage to reach sponsors. It was > road block for them. That's an odd case, I suppose. I

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (f38). "Upstream update to 7.900059."

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 15:58:02 UTC From b89e53614294cc2e8b08dba11a0e409e87adb827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Apr 03 2023 15:36:24 + Subject: Upstream update to 7.900059. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 2f196ae..d722849 100644 ---

corsepiu pushed to rpms/perl-Validation-Class (rawhide). "Upstream update to 7.900059."

Notification time stamped 2023-04-03 15:37:27 UTC From b89e53614294cc2e8b08dba11a0e409e87adb827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Apr 03 2023 15:36:24 + Subject: Upstream update to 7.900059. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 2f196ae..d722849 100644 ---

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230402.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 133 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.68 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Dne 03. 04. 23 v 19:09 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a): > Again. This is not what we are telling them. Again? There's no need for that. I apologize. It was not my intention to sound harsh. Is two years long enough? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958193

Re: Any interest in maintaining spyder (python IDE)?

Hi Mukundan, Jonathan, I have been working on becoming a fedora maintainer and I would love to help. When I followed the links to the build logs I got a 404. Blaise On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jonathan Wright via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > You added me on it a while

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

> Miroslav Suchý writes: > Again. This is not what we are telling them. Again? There's no need for that. In any case, what I wrote was the procedure I documented it when I set it up. If all of that documentation was lost, then I don't know what to say but that's not what was intended. I

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Dne 03. 04. 23 v 18:24 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a): If a package makes it through review but can't be imported because the prospective maintainer isn't in the packager group, they should file a ticket with the sponsors (https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/) and they will be taken care of. Again.

Re: Orphaned: hstr

I built it for EPEL9 BTW :) On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:12 PM Jonathan Wright via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an >> update released once upstream

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

> Jakub Kadlčík writes: > Currently, we have 31 people waiting to be sponsored > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/needsponsor.html many of > them waiting for months. To get to the point of waiting to be > sponsored, all of these people invested their time to learn the basics >

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Personally I'd not really like this solution. For some sponsors which have tons of time and can always take on people to mentor it will be great for those folks. For people who get "assigned" to sponsors that don't necessarily have time and don't update their status to unavailable or whatever at

Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG Meeting (2023-04-03)

= #fedora-meeting: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG = Meeting started by kalev at 14:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available at

Re: Orphaned: hstr

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:12 PM Jonathan Wright via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I've grabbed this package. I'll keep an eye on the GH issue and get an > update released once upstream releases patches/updates for the kernel > issues. > Thanks, Jonathan. I was a happy hstr

Re: Any interest in maintaining spyder (python IDE)?

You added me on it a while back and I haven't done anything with it yet, but I do still intend to work on it when I get a chance. On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:52 AM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the > time I took up maintaining spyder,

[Bug 2171353] /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req create bogus requirements on usage function of dpkg-source.pl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171353 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||694496 Resolution|---

[Bug 694496] rpm requirements - provides/requires (tracker)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694496 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2171353 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 694496] rpm requirements - provides/requires (tracker)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694496 Bug 694496 depends on bug 2171353, which changed state. Bug 2171353 Summary: /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req create bogus requirements on usage function of dpkg-source.pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171353 What|Removed

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230402.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 46 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.12 MiB Size of dropped packages:1.89 MiB Size

[Bug 2165567] Upgrade perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical to 1.000

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Version|38 |rawhide Summary|Upgrade

[rpms/perl-Math-BigInt] PR #5: Add reverse dependency tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Math-BigInt` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Add reverse dependency tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-BigInt/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Timeshift on Fedora

Good morning all, I had a strange experience with Timeshift last week. For those that don't know, Timeshift is a software that allows you to make a backup of your system (As a snapshot) and restore it in case you need to. I installed it a couple weeks ago and made a backup. I couldn't make a

[Bug 2132717] Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132717 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Net-DNS-SEC-1.20-4.fc3

[Bug 2183997] perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183997 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0

[rpms/perl-Math-BigInt] PR #5: Add reverse dependency tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Math-BigInt` that you are following: `` Add reverse dependency tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-BigInt/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel

[Bug 2183997] perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183997 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com,|

[Bug 2183998] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183998 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1439151] Port to gnupg2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439151 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2183998] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183998 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 2183998] New: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183998 Bug ID: 2183998 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 2183997] New: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183997 Bug ID: 2183997 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc-0.5014 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc Keywords:

Re: fedrq - new repoquerying tool

On Sun Feb 12, 2023 at 05:31 +, Maxwell G wrote: > Hi Fedorians, > > I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd > like to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a > friendly interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it > really easy to

[Bug 2183924] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230331.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183924 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-d19525b6cd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d19525b6cd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2183924] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230331.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183924 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedpkg: Could not execute pre_push_check: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403

Thanks. That worked. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

[Bug 2183924] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230331.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183924 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com,| |ka...@ucw.cz,

[Bug 2183880] perl-Test-Compile-3.2.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183880 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e21cdf8758 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e21cdf8758 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2181971] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-f98d2dea6c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f98d2dea6c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 2181971] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-43ac6bf5f5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-43ac6bf5f5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 2181971] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #21 from

[Bug 2181971] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |--- Status|CLOSED

[Bug 2183880] perl-Test-Compile-3.2.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183880 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Compile-3.2.0-1.f

[Bug 2183924] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230331.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183924 Bug ID: 2183924 Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230331.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data Keywords:

Re: %patchN deprecated?

On 3/31/23 18:49, Ron Olson wrote: One thing to note is that the new format doesn’t work with EPEL releases; I had to revert to the %patchN style for them. The following bit from https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html was already quoted in this thread, but:

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Il 02/04/23 18:42, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 5:37 PM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: >> Il 31/03/23 17:27, Florian Festi ha scritto: >>> On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Florian Festi: > On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19 >> >>> == Detailed Description == >>> RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many of >>> them are