[Bug 2196384] Please branch and build perl-Net-SSH2 in epel8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196384 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: Review swap Bottles dependencies

On 22-04-2023 14:36, Sandro wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a review for a couple of Bottles dependencies. 1. python-fvs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 2. vkbasalt-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 Both are Python packages and I'll be happy to do reviews

Re: HEADS UP: libphonenumber-8.12.x update to 8.13.x on rawhide

On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 23:59 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > As conclusion of comment [1], abipkgdiff between version 8.12.x and > 8.13.x may have an ABI change, so I will rebuild the 7 packages that > depend on it, [2] chatty, evolution-data-server, kf5-kitinerary, > mmsd- > tng, ncid,

Re: Has anything changed in terms of how to build a signed kernel semi-recently?

Am 17.05.23 um 23:35 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Hello, I tried building a signed 6.3 kernel today after a while (6.1 timeframe). Unfortunately, it appears that I am hitting some issues with pesign: + /usr/bin/pesign --certdir /etc/pki/pesign -t 'NSS Certificate DB' -c 'Julians Secure Boot

Has anything changed in terms of how to build a signed kernel semi-recently?

Hello, I tried building a signed 6.3 kernel today after a while (6.1 timeframe). Unfortunately, it appears that I am hitting some issues with pesign: + /usr/bin/pesign --certdir /etc/pki/pesign -t 'NSS Certificate DB' -c 'Julians Secure Boot signing key - Julian Sikorski' -s -i

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-05-17

#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_coreos_meeting Meeting started by dustymabe at 16:28:50 UTC. The full logs are available at

[EPEL-devel] Ansible in EPEL 8

Hello EPEL users and developers, RHEL 8.8 was released yesterday, so I have updated ansible in EPEL 8 from 6.3.0 to 7.2.0 to match RHEL 8.8's ansible-core bump from 2.13.3 to 2.14.2. Each ansible major version is tied to a specific major version of ansible-core, and we keep them in sync. Along

PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2023

Hi all, I've joined annual PWG+OpenPrinting virtual meetup where the news and statuses from the current printing development are discussed. The main points are: - cups-filters 2.0 betas and release candidates are released and present in Fedora 38 - since new cups-filters are in Fedora 38,

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

Hi, On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 12:23 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > You use it in to fix bus names in flatpak-evolution-wrapper.sh - > those could just be hardcoded since the bus name will be always the > same for the Evolution Flatpak It will work unless the version of the D-Bus service is

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:42 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > [...] > > Any Fedora packager can rebuild a package into f39-app using 'fepdkg > > build --target=f39-app'. > > > [...] > > Once a package exists in f39-app or f38-app, then > > [[ >

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:51 AM Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 09:30 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > Does that sound workable? Are there better ways we could do it? > > Hi, > if I recall correctly, using the custom D-Bus prefix is there to match > application's D-Bus prefix

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Vagrant 2.3 (Self-Contained)

Hello, I've tested on rawhide: https://gist.github.com/pvalena/8b08cfff5e4a7f06c456a0fc79cd654b All looks good. Pavel On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:17 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_2.3 > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE broken on CentOS Stream 9

Thanks for all your work keeping KDE running for us EL folks! On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:58 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > KDE is still not able to be upgraded in CentOS Stream 9. > This is my fault. > I tried to combine the rebuilds needed for the new qt5, with updating the > rest of the KDE Plasma

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE broken on CentOS Stream 9

KDE is still not able to be upgraded in CentOS Stream 9. This is my fault. I tried to combine the rebuilds needed for the new qt5, with updating the rest of the KDE Plasma Desktop. This didn't go well. I will be removing the updates from epel-next-testing and starting again with just the packages

[Bug 2207950] New: Please build perl-Frontier-RPC for EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207950 Bug ID: 2207950 Summary: Please build perl-Frontier-RPC for EPEL9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Frontier-RPC Assignee:

Re: F36 is End of Life

Hi again, Apologies, and indeed it is a typo in the mail it should be f39. Correction: Fedora Linux f37 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora Linux f39. Thanks On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 2:20 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > On Wed, May 17,

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230517.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230516.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230517.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 221 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 13.98 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

pghmcfc pushed to rpms/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (rawhide). "Drop redundant rpmlintrc"

Notification time stamped 2023-05-17 11:30:02 UTC From aa1e17d9ec0e5370653b652daa1cab7464554cd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: May 17 2023 11:24:16 + Subject: Drop redundant rpmlintrc --- diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.rpmlintrc

pghmcfc pushed to rpms/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (rawhide). "Use SPDX-format license tag"

Notification time stamped 2023-05-17 11:30:03 UTC From fed18bb8f1f3683295977a29e79b0fda59f0a33a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: May 17 2023 11:24:59 + Subject: Use SPDX-format license tag --- diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec

[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS] PR #1: 3.50 bump; Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.50 bump; Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS] PR #1: 3.50 bump; Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS` that you are following: `` 3.50 bump; Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS/pull-request/1 ___

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras

On 5/15/23 19:33, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:56 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: Hello Python packagers. RPM 4.19 introduces this feature: https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dynamic_specs.html

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230517.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230517.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[EPEL-devel] Re: python3.11-rpm to EPEL 9

On 16. 05. 23 15:44, Maxwell G wrote: On Tue May 16, 2023 at 11:04 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 15. 05. 23 16:49, Maxwell G wrote: On Mon May 15, 2023 at 12:14 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, I'm working on adding python3.11-rpm to EPEL 9 and EPEL 9 Next. See

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: python3.11-rpm to EPEL 9

On 16. 05. 23 15:44, Maxwell G wrote: On Tue May 16, 2023 at 11:04 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 15. 05. 23 16:49, Maxwell G wrote: On Mon May 15, 2023 at 12:14 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, I'm working on adding python3.11-rpm to EPEL 9 and EPEL 9 Next. See

Re: F36 is End of Life

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:32 AM Samyak Jain wrote: > On the other hand, Fedora Linux f37 will continue to receive updates until > approximately one month after the release of Fedora Linux f38. > Sorry, but that should say "one month after the release of Fedora Linux f *39*". Jens

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

V Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:54:39AM +0100, Aoife Moloney napsal(a): > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules > [...] > === Rebuilding RPMs === > For each Fedora release, we'll have two additional targets > > f39-flatpak-runtime (inherits f39), tags:

[rpms/perl-Text-PDF] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-PDF` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-PDF/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Text-PDF] PR #1: Update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-PDF` that you are following: `` Update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-PDF/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

SPDX Statistics - SPDX Hackfest edition

Two weeks ago we had: * 23000 spec files in Fedora (wow, nice round number :) ) * 29503license tags in all spec files * 18744 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 7157tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` * Progress: 36% ░░░███ 100% ELN subset: * 1987 out

[Bug 2207777] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230516.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED