https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177932
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e38e484771 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-a5147703b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
Look its not like I have not tried libreoffice as a flat but as of now it looks
out of place, I can't even see the icons even when I use the default adwaita or
breeze themes.
How is this an improvement?
I wanted to leave ubuntu because of crap like this, where they forced snaps
down my throat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209937
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
This is a stupid bonehead idea, libreoffice is just too big to reliably run in
flatpak.
Plus what about java integration, guess the languagetool plugin wont work now
and I will have to use its stupud online version where you havwe to pay to add
words.
Oh well, back to debian.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177932
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ae600320ff has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
Hi Orion,
Glad objdump helped -- the second approach I meant to write objcopy, which
actually strips the symbols.
Regarding how the symbols might show up in the library automatically,
here's how it might happen. When I took a look at one of the build.log
files from koji at the following link:
No LibreOffice, no continuation with Fedora. LO better be there with F39.
Without it, all you have is Firefox. It is not enough to keep Fedora Diehards
from jumping to another popular distribution.
Leslie
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 8:07 p.m., Sandro wrote: On
Hello team,
I would like to bring back the topic related to the selection of
bootloader notably either GRUB2 and systemd-boot. With the recent
adoption on UKI kernel, it would be great to get systemd-boot ready for
at least Fedora 39 which is useful for devices like laptops. Currently,
some
On 02-06-2023 16:09, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 01:55:30AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the
deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to
transition the package from Red Hat maintenance to Fedora
On 6/1/23 23:00, Paul Grosu wrote:
Hi Orion,
There are two ways to remove the debugging symbols:
1) strip --strip-debug your_library.so
2) objcopy --strip-debug your_library.so
Below is an example of both approaches:
1) Method using strip:
paul$ objdump --syms libfoo.so | grep debug
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-CharWidth`
that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-CharWidth/pull-request/2
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Scalar-List-Utils`
that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/4
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sys-CPU` that you
are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-RegExp` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-RegExp/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-DOM` that you
are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-DOM/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >ELN SIG on 2023-06-02 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
> >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
> >
> > The meeting will
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 9:40 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:28 PM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 07:20, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >>
> >> Lets not make this a drama.
> >>
> >> Package maintenance changes have never gone through change
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Scalar-List-Utils` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/3
___
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Sys-CPU` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Text-CharWidth` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-CharWidth/pull-request/1
___
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-XML-DOM` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-DOM/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-XML-RegExp` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-RegExp/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211942
Bug ID: 2211942
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-9.4.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dear Daniel,
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:57 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > I maintain OpenSSH that has a lot of heavy-interfering downstream
> > patches. I’d like to reduce the burden of rebase by
Dear Chris,
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:42 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Dmitry Belyavskiy said:
> > I maintain OpenSSH that has a lot of heavy-interfering downstream
> > patches. I’d like to reduce the burden of rebase by combining some of
> > them.
>
> Wow that's a lot of patches.
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-TokeParser`
that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/pull-request/2
___
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-XML-TokeParser` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-TokeParser/pull-request/1
___
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I maintain OpenSSH that has a lot of heavy-interfering downstream
> patches. I’d like to reduce the burden of rebase by combining some of
> them.
Trying to reduce the burden by combining patches won't help
Once upon a time, Dmitry Belyavskiy said:
> I maintain OpenSSH that has a lot of heavy-interfering downstream
> patches. I’d like to reduce the burden of rebase by combining some of
> them.
Wow that's a lot of patches. Some appear to be Fedora specific, but a
bunch seem like general fixes. Has
Dear colleagues,
I maintain OpenSSH that has a lot of heavy-interfering downstream
patches. I’d like to reduce the burden of rebase by combining some of
them.
So I wonder if there is software checking for cross-dependencies
between patches to see what are the natural candidates for combining?
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 04:02:35PM +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Le 2023-06-02 10:40, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 08:34:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>qemu is building now:
> >>
> >>https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101710059
> >
> >This
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 01:55:30AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the
> deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to
> transition the package from Red Hat maintenance to Fedora
> maintenance. I would even go as far as that
Le 2023-06-02 10:40, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 08:34:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
qemu is building now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101710059
This failed because of the data center shutdown, second attempt:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 09:40, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:28 PM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 07:20, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >>
> >> Lets not make this a drama.
> >>
> >> Package maintenance changes have never gone through change proposals.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:28 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 07:20, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> Lets not make this a drama.
>>
>> Package maintenance changes have never gone through change proposals.
>>
>
> I am sorry, but this was made into a drama by the way this was
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 07:20, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Lets not make this a drama.
>
> Package maintenance changes have never gone through change proposals.
>
>
I am sorry, but this was made into a drama by the way this was executed.
Surprise is the opposite of engagement and dropping a ton of
Hello
If you are still looking for co-maintainers, I can also help.
Hussein
Am 01.06.23 um 22:16 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel:
I've taken ownership of libreoffice for the time being, at least to keep the
lights on. Co-maintainers, as always, welcome.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
Terry,
> I appreciate and am empathetic to all of those carrying the burden of this
> and the thousands of other RPM packages. As a users of Fedora + RPM Fusion +
> Cinnamon Desktop as my daily laptop driver since 2011, I love Fedora and am a
> heavy user of Flatpacks. So thank you all.
>
>
I appreciate and am empathetic to all of those carrying the burden of this
and the thousands of other RPM packages. As a users of Fedora + RPM
Fusion + Cinnamon Desktop as my daily laptop driver since 2011, I love
Fedora and am a heavy user of Flatpacks. So thank you all.
That said, I will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-a5147703b6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a5147703b6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-acaea55b63 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-acaea55b63
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
wow thank you so much!!! I will have a look of them~
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Lets not make this a drama.
Package maintenance changes have never gone through change proposals.
> However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the
deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to
transition the package from Red Hat maintenance to Fedora
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-NetAddr-IP` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
On Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 09:08, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 30/05/23 22:15, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f563346d4d is
> > similar, but this time it was ejected from its push *to stable* (not to
> > testing), again allegedly for
Hello Pythonistas,
Let me announce the release of pyproject-rpm-macros 1.9.0.
The new version is available in Rawhide+ELN Koji and updates are penfing for
older Fedora releases. A sync to c9s is in progress but will require a review,
so it might take longer.
The new version has the
On 6/1/23 13:09, Betty Liu wrote:
> Hi I also come from China ~ I'm Betty and now I'm learning about how to
> become a packager (so I think it's not the time to do a self-introduction in
> devel now hhh)
>
> Nice to have someone come from the same country! If you have the time maybe
> you can
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Scalar-List-Utils`
that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/3
___
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Scalar-List-Utils` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/2
___
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 08:34:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> qemu is building now:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101710059
This failed because of the data center shutdown, second attempt:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101716211
Rich.
--
> Il 02/06/23 01:55, Sandro ha scritto:
> I'm having a bad feeling about Fedora future lately, seeing all these RH
> withdrawals from the project.
That escalated quickly, yes. More worryingly: It escalated non-openly and
non-collaboratively.
> I hope to be wrong. But could Fedora survive the
Damn thats a long list.
On 6/2/23 01:21, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
I've taken ownership of libreoffice for the time being, at least to keep
the lights on.
Also of the many dependencies?
As far as I can tell, from the list in the orphaned package report, all
On 6/2/23 01:09, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I haven’t written Java in years, but my understanding is
that AOT compilation has three major advantages:
1. It reduces the size of total deliverables because the
final executable only includes the libraries it
Il 02/06/23 01:55, Sandro ha scritto:
>
> However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the
> deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to
> transition the package from Red Hat maintenance to Fedora maintenance. I
> would even go as far as that this should
58 matches
Mail list logo
