On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 09:40, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:28 PM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoo...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 07:20, Matthias Clasen <mcla...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Lets not make this a drama.
> >>
> >> Package maintenance changes have never gone through change proposals.
> >>
> >
> > I am  sorry, but this was made into a drama by the way this was
> executed. Surprise is the opposite of engagement and dropping a ton of
> packages and their dependencies and then announcing it is absolute surprise.
> >
> > This isn't just package maintenance. This is a major change in what is
> expected to be included in the next workstation editions with the removal
> of expected functionality. If the packages are not picked up within a
> certain amount of time or can be rebuilt it means many packages will need
> to be edited. Those changes need to be researched, announced, and pushed
> through.
> >
> > It is also drama because people in the community have no idea what else
> will take place? When uncertainty and doubt are allowed into the
> conversation, people jump to the extremes so they can feel ready to deal
> with it.
> >
> > Could we try something different for future changes?
> > 1. Announce that Red Hat will be moving from owning said packages and
> dependencies on X date.
> > 2. Let people grieve about things for a short while but make it clear
> its happening. See if community members or other companies will take up the
> burden
> > 3. Do the orphan or hand over of packages to the new group.
> >
> > Instead of 3,1,2?
>
> That may not always be possible, sometimes it involves departure or
> changes of roles for people and those can be delicate and are not
> always notifiable. I'm not sure that is the case here but I do know,
> from a blog post [1], that the previous maintainer is no longer at Red
> Hat.
>
>
Yes, I did engage mouth before brain on this. It isn't alway possible, and
real life is messy. My apologies to Matthias in my wording makes it sound
like this dropping was his decision and the way it was executed was his
doing and fault.



> Peter
>
> [1] https://meeksfamily.uk/~michael/blog/2023-05-15-caolan.html
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to