On 6/28/23 22:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:26 PM Simon de Vlieger wrote:
On 6/28/23 21:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
The current Workstation live has the package exclusions from fedora-
workstation-common.ks in it:
On 29. 06. 23 0:31, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Can we allow users to create a minimal installation by hand, while still
complying
with PEP-615 for default installs?
The size savings for a minimal container that is UTC-only would be quite
valuable
for Fedora minimal containers.
Yes, but see the
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
intel-ipsec-mb-1.4.0-1.el8
nagios-plugins-check-updates-2.0.4-2.el8
Details about builds:
intel-ipsec-mb-1.4.0-1.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c5ad3565aa
libmodsecurity-3.0.9-2.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
barman-3.6.0-2.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217200
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||gnucash-5.2-2.fc38
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230628.n.2. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, Jun 29 2023 at 12:24:23 AM +0200, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, though this is only partially
reassuring:
I'm not sure how this accounts for the fact that there are some
situations in which weak dependencies are *not installed at all*.
Most notably, they are
On 6/28/23 18:24, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:15 AM Carlos O'Donell
> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/26/23 16:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> So all this considered, I'm not sure whether this change is
>>> actually worth it, if tzdata databases of some form will likely
>>> be pulled
On 6/26/23 14:14, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 7:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> *PEP 615 – Support for the IANA Time Zone Database in the Standard Library*
>> says:
>>
>>
>> """
>> Python distributors are encouraged to ensure that time zone data is installed
>
> The wording of
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:15 AM Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> On 6/26/23 16:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > So all this considered, I'm not sure whether this change is actually
> > worth it, if tzdata databases of some form will likely be pulled into
> > installs anyway.
>
> Quoting the "Weak
On 6/26/23 14:40, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yep, this is the case for rubygem-tzinfo. It would deserve recommends
> at minimum, because in theory, the tzdata can be suplied by
> tzinfo-data gem instead.
Thank you for adding the `Recommends: tzdata`!
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
On 6/26/23 16:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So all this considered, I'm not sure whether this change is actually
> worth it, if tzdata databases of some form will likely be pulled into
> installs anyway.
Quoting the "Weak Dependencies Policy":
"Weak dependencies allow smaller minimal
On 6/27/23 05:38, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> JDK will behave similarly. We ave (small) advantage that we have also
> in-jdk-bundled tzdata. However fallback in case of removed system
> tzdata is not automatic, and requires human touch. Long ago we have a
> patch in jdk which looked to system tzdata - if
On 6/28/23 03:44, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 04:54:00PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> * Other developers: Some packages need to change their spec files from
>> `Requires: tzdata` to `Recommends: tzdata`. It would be beneficial if
>> all packages switched in this way, but it
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> FTBFS:
>
> 0ad
> arbor
> CuraEngine
> bout++
> cachelib
> dolphin-emu
> folly
> freeopcua
> gerbera
> luxcorerender
> mangohud
> wasmedge
> watchman
>
I fixed 0ad from that list and built it in the
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:26 PM Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>
> On 6/28/23 21:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > The current Workstation live has the package exclusions from fedora-
> > workstation-common.ks in it:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/blob/main/f/fedora-workstation-common.ks
> >
On 6/28/23 21:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
The current Workstation live has the package exclusions from fedora-
workstation-common.ks in it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/blob/main/f/fedora-workstation-common.ks
so it excludes three groups that are part of the 'standard' for live
images
On 6/26/23 09:21, Aoife Moloney wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildJdkOncePackEverywhere#including_portable_srpms_in_release_(improving_of_step_6)
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 18:44 +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>
> What I would like to know is what is the minimum customizations needed
> in blueprints for this change proposal and what is necessary for
> supporting editions and spins down the line.
Thanks, Simon. So, we obviously don't need
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-06-28/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-06-28-16.29.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-06-28/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-06-28-16.29.txt
Log:
FTBFS:
0ad
arbor
CuraEngine
bout++
cachelib
dolphin-emu
folly
freeopcua
gerbera
luxcorerender
mangohud
wasmedge
watchman
I think I will merge this side tag without fmt9 compatibility package
tomorrow.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 6/26/23 12:21, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildJdkOncePackEverywhere#including_portable_srpms_in_release_(improving_of_step_6)
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to
On Wed, Jun 28 2023 at 07:06:13 PM +0200, Jiří Konečný
wrote:
However, I'm not sure how you can start Orca on the Workstation Live
environment. Would be great to find that out from someone who knows
GNOME more than me.
Should be: Alt+Super+S
___
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:41:48PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> I mailed the admin listed for that site... hopefully they can correct
> their mirror and/or mirrormanager to fix it up.
>
> I marked it inactive in the mean time... they can reacitivate it when
> it's fixed.
Just to circle back:
Hi, thanks for this question.
We tested the accessibility and so far looks good. The benefit of this solution
is that we based on PatternFly components which takes care of accessibility for
us. For showing Web UI we are going to use Firefox so that should be also fine.
However, I'm not sure
Adam Williamson napsal:
>On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 18:21 +0200, Jiří Konečný wrote:
>> >
>> > I think the points discussed in the ticket (layering/inheritance, and
>> > package removals) are critical and they need an answer to be figured
>> > out *before* we start switching Fedora live images to
Hi,
I am not a developer, I do rely on accessibility such as orca. I think the
last time I tested it, the image booted but there seems to be know way to get
orca speaking so could not test accessibility of installing. I am guessing
this is being taking into account? As it stands now, if an
On 6/28/23 17:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 13:01 +0200, Ondřej Budai wrote:
I already answered you here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/384#comment-862709
TL;DR: Let's figure this out when we are migrating other artifacts. For
now, the blueprint will be
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 18:21 +0200, Jiří Konečný wrote:
> >
> > I think the points discussed in the ticket (layering/inheritance, and
> > package removals) are critical and they need an answer to be figured
> > out *before* we start switching Fedora live images to be built with a
> > different
On 28. 06. 23 15:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 6/28/23 09:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence
On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:15:48 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 27.06.23 12:04, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On 6/22/23 19:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopting_sysusers.d_format
> > >
> > > I would caution against this
Richard Shaw wrote on 2023/06/28 23:40:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:37 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:12 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed.
gnuradio
Issue filed upstream:
Hi all,
Adam Williamson napsal:
>On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 13:01 +0200, Ondřej Budai wrote:
>> I already answered you here:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/384#comment-862709
>>
>> TL;DR: Let's figure this out when we are migrating other artifacts. For
>> now, the blueprint will be
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 13:01 +0200, Ondřej Budai wrote:
> I already answered you here:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/384#comment-862709
>
> TL;DR: Let's figure this out when we are migrating other artifacts. For
> now, the blueprint will be empty/minimal.
Thanks a lot for engaging
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 13:23 +0200, Ondřej Budai wrote:
> We can definitely flatten the JSON output into something that resembles a
> log file. I will let you know when this is done.
>
> Note that every task also produces a manifest file - this is extremely
> useful, because you can just feed it
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 12:58 +0200, Ondřej Budai wrote:
> Hi Adam and Ben!
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:14 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > In terms of testing: we already test the existing toolchain pretty
> > effectively in practice. openQA builds Workstation and KDE live images
>
On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 04:23 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:52 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 17:59 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> > > The Koji integration leaves many things to be desired. I've had to dig
> > far
> > > more than needed for
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:37 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:12 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed.
>>
>> gnuradio
>>
>
> Issue filed upstream:
> https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/6735
>
> FTBFS:
> contour-terminal
Applying the related upstream commit as the patch, the rebuild succeeded.
Ref: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102707247
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Di, 27.06.23 12:04, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 6/22/23 19:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopting_sysusers.d_format
> >
> > I would caution against this whole proposal. Not that I'm against it, but
> > just saying be careful doing
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> But, IMHO the largest change is moving the boot kernel/initrd to the
> ESP, rather than the use of systemd-boot itself. Given the
> filesystem layout remains the same outside of those two items and
> the BLS entries, all the common
On 28/06/2023 15:00, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
Known regression in fmt. Please, apply
https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/pull/3430.
Thanks for the information. The fix has been ported to fmt-10.0.0-2.fc39.
waybar is now fixed.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
> FTBFS:
> easyrpg-player
Upstream has already updated the program to work with fmt10,
so I just applied the relevant commit to the Fedora package.
Submitted and rebuilt:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102705429
A.FI.
___
devel
On 6/28/23 04:10, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed.
FTBFS:
waybar
Known regression in fmt. Please, apply
https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/pull/3430.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:25 AM Ondřej Budai wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 2:20 PM Jonathan Steffan
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:23 AM Ondřej Budai wrote:
>
> > Maybe I'm just using it wrong, but I've not found a different way.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will take a look. The
On 28/06/2023 14:10, Kalev Lember wrote:
Since you already have the compat package, I would suggest merging the
side tag as is.
I'm waiting for dnf5:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/675
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218180
I fixed some packages with
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2023-06-27 17:06:56 -, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Anyone interested can join the `#libreoffice-sig:fedoraproject.org` matrix
> room for discussion.
Nope, it's #libreoffice:fedoraproject.org
Eike
--
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 2:20 PM Jonathan Steffan
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:23 AM Ondřej Budai wrote:
>
>> > Maybe I'm just using it wrong, but I've not found a different way.
>>>
>> I will take a look. The difference between livemedia and osbuildImage is
>> that the osbuildImage
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:23 AM Ondřej Budai wrote:
> > Maybe I'm just using it wrong, but I've not found a different way.
>>>
>>
> I will take a look. The difference between livemedia and osbuildImage is
> that the osbuildImage task is defined by a plugin
>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed.
>
> FTBFS:
>
> 0ad
> arbor
> CuraEngine
> bout++
> cachelib
> contour-terminal
> dnf5
> dolphin-emu
> easyrpg-player
> folly
> freeopcua
> gerbera
> gnuradio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218171
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218169
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-MouseX-Types-Path-Clas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218168
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:12 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed.
>
> gnuradio
>
Issue filed upstream:
https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/6735
Also, not all the maintainers may review the devel list as closely.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:24 PM Jonathan Steffan
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:52 AM Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 17:59 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
>> > The Koji integration leaves many things to be desired. I've had to dig
>> far
>>
Hi Kevin!
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:41 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * Other developers:
> > Our focus for this change is specifically on Fedora Workstation.
> > Nevertheless, we are open to collaborating with all spins/SIG to
> > transition their build pipelines to Image Builder. However, for the
Hi,
A little late for the party , I decide publish my helper_scripts on a
github repo, maybe all this will be supersede by Packit
https://github.com/sergiomb2/herlper_scripts
Usage :
fedpkg clone foo-package
cd foo-packge
~/bin/update_from_bugzilla.sh id_bug stage_number
echo "stage 0:
Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed.
FTBFS:
0ad
arbor
CuraEngine
bout++
cachelib
contour-terminal
dnf5
dolphin-emu
easyrpg-player
folly
freeopcua
gerbera
gnuradio
luxcorerender
mangohud
nheko
wasmedge
watchman
waybar
Please fix your packages and use f39-build-side-69394 side tag:
fedpkg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218171
Bug ID: 2218171
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170
Bug ID: 2218170
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218169
Bug ID: 2218169
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218168
Bug ID: 2218168
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218167
Bug ID: 2218167
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
I already answered you here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/384#comment-862709
TL;DR: Let's figure this out when we are migrating other artifacts. For
now, the blueprint will be empty/minimal.
Cheers,
Ondřej
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023
Hi Adam and Ben!
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:14 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
>
> In terms of testing: we already test the existing toolchain pretty
> effectively in practice. openQA builds Workstation and KDE live images
> with every relevant critical path update. If an update breaks live
> image
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 04:20, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 28/06/2023 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> > How I can fix that?
>
> Steps how to fix such issues for historical purposes:
>
> 1. Create a new side tag.
> 2. Introduce compatibility fmt9 package.
>
Dne 27. 06. 23 v 10:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 06. 23 v 22:12 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:40 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26. 06. 23 v 20:24 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:10 PM Miro Hrončok
wrote:
(snip)
---
The current problem with
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:52 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 17:59 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> > The Koji integration leaves many things to be desired. I've had to dig
> far
> > more than needed for osbuildimage stuff.
>
[...]
> > Maybe I'm just using it wrong, but I've
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.23 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.23 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
You could bootstrap dnf for the rebuild
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnf/blob/rawhide/f/dnf.spec#_298
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom`
that you are following:
``
1.23 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom`
that you are following:
``
1.23 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
1.23 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing
On 28/06/2023 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
How I can fix that?
Steps how to fix such issues for historical purposes:
1. Create a new side tag.
2. Introduce compatibility fmt9 package.
3. Build fmt9 compatibility package.
4. Build fmt 10.
5. Rebuild dnf5 against fmt 10.
6. Untag fmt9 from this
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 04:54:00PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> * Other developers: Some packages need to change their spec files from
> `Requires: tzdata` to `Recommends: tzdata`. It would be beneficial if
> all packages switched in this way, but it is not required. Supporting
> optional tzdata
On Wednesday, 28 June 2023 at 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 23/05/2023 12:22, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> > I will use my proven-packager rights to rebuild all dependent packages
> > in a separate side tag next week.
>
> Koji is now broken in this side tag (f39-build-side-69392):
>
>
On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 17:59 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
>
> The Koji integration leaves many things to be desired. I've had to dig far
> more than needed for osbuildimage stuff.
>
> For example,
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all=tree=osbuildImage=-id
> is nearly useless to
On 23/05/2023 12:22, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
I will use my proven-packager rights to rebuild all dependent packages
in a separate side tag next week.
Koji is now broken in this side tag (f39-build-side-69392):
Error:
Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.16.1-2.fc39.noarch from build
requires
80 matches
Mail list logo
