Am 01.08.23 um 17:14 schrieb Lubomír Sedlář:
It should be possible as self service:
koji tag-build f37-updates-candidate perl-Calendar-Simple-2.0.3-1.fc37
(If you can trigger the tagging by building, Koji should let you tag it
directly too.)
Great, thanks! This indeed did the job!
Ralf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
On 01. 08. 23 23:48, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Can you exempt the golang packages for a while more?
I did, but could you please email me directly with such last minute requests
next time?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
On 7/31/23 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
this week.
Policy:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 06:48:14PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 16:45 -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 08:59:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 21:41 -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
StdOut:
warning: %patchN is deprecated (1 usages found), use %patch N (or %patch -P N)
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1690848000
error: Bad file: ./Mozilla-CA-20230801.tar.gz: No such file or directory
RPM build warnings:
%patchN is deprecated (1 usages found), use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228222
Bug ID: 2228222
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20230801 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mozilla-CA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228222
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1981202
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1981202=edit
Update to 20230801 (#2228222)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 18:50:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Did you get to the bottom of what's really happening here?
As in the message that opened this topic, it is suspected that there
has been a change to mount with kernel ntfs3 instead of ntfs-3g.
I remember I've not had corruption
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:00 PM Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
wrote:
>
> I noticed that a few change proposals that have been approved still did
> not get a bug tracker, e.g.: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17
>
> As things have changed this release, I'm wondering if the process
>
I noticed that a few change proposals that have been approved still did
not get a bug tracker, e.g.: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17
As things have changed this release, I'm wondering if the process
changed.
Is the bug creation still in plan?
--
Tulio Magno
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-08-02 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
Hello Pythonistas and Rustaceans,
TL;DR: Only PyO3 v0.19.2 (and later) will ever properly support Python
3.12. Port your Python projects to v0.19 **NOW**.
Older versions of PyO3 (especially pyo3 v0.15, v0.16, v0.17, and
v0.18) are *not* compatible with Python 3.12 due to some ABI changes
in
Perfect. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
Fabio Valentini píše v Út 01. 08. 2023 v 16:55 +0200:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and
> > success state at the same time:
> >
> > Cf.
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:47 PM Andrew Bauer
wrote:
>
> I appreciate the response. Would you mind pointing me to Miro's latest FTBS
> announcement?
>
> This list was emailed to me again on July 25, and it still identified a
> problem with xmvn-connector-ivy.
It was sent to the mailing lists
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:02 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 01.08.23 um 16:55 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and
> >> success state at the same time:
> >>
Am 01.08.23 um 16:55 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Hi,
Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and
success state at the same time:
Cf.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652
The link above
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-rpm-build-perl-0.82-43
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and
> success state at the same time:
>
> Cf.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652
>
> The link above redirects to
>
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 10:49, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and
> success state at the same time:
>
> Cf.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652
>
> The link above redirects to
>
Hi,
Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and
success state at the same time:
Cf.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652
The link above redirects to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104215785
Which contains:
...
OSError:
I appreciate the response. Would you mind pointing me to Miro's latest FTBS
announcement?
This list was emailed to me again on July 25, and it still identified a problem
with xmvn-connector-ivy.
___
devel mailing list --
On 27. 07. 23 20:03, Tom Stellard wrote:
* #3039 RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency
Mechanism (tstellar, 17:04:33)
* AGREED: APPROVED(+7,0,-0) The switch to DNF5 will be postponed
(likely to Fedora 41, to be determined by the Change Owners) and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227759
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Doc Type|---
> However, xmvn-connector-ivy mock builds in rawhide just fine.
Note that this is an old mail from Miro, in his most recent FTBFS announcement
the package isn't listed anymore as it has been fixed in the mean time.
Before that, there was no successful build since f36.
Hope that helps
After reading through this list multiple times, I am having trouble
understanding if there is anything that needs to be done in my case.
This list flags the package I maintain, combozola:
>cambozola (maintained by: kni)
> cambozola-0.936-20.fc38.noarch requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227489
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpanminus-1.7047-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227489
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hi everyone,
We have updated OpenSSL from 3.0.8 to 3.1.1 [1] in rawhide.
This version is ABI compatible with the 3.0 series.
Kindly rebuild your packages if you think it has some additional checks for
version beyond ABI.
OpenSSH is an example of such a package and it is already being rebuilt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ---
Do you say debuginfo? Then it's because the symbol is not exported anymore:
$ nm -D /usr/lib64/libperl.so.5.36 | grep Perl_pp_entersub
0011f0f0 T Perl_pp_entersub
That was an intentional change in
Hi folks,
Would any Fedora TeXLive users have any scripts to figure out what
TeXLive packages a TeX/LaTeX document uses and install them using dnf?
I've got this hacked up and it does work and I was wondering if I should
move it to a different repository and package it up to make it available
to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230731.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230801.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.26 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 8/1/23 12:41, Petr Menšík wrote:
No, I am afraid that is not gist of that response. We still want
mdns4_minimal to be preferred variant and others to be configurable
manually. Sadly, they are all still needed, with minimal variants
preferred.
and also --with-mdns should be possible in
Hello,
I have just orphaned the maven-clean-plugin[1].
We no longer need it as a dependency.
There are still some packages in rawhide that depend on maven-clean-plugin:
# dnf repoquery --whatrequires maven-clean-plugin --enablerepo=*
antlr4-project-0:4.10.1-9.fc39.src
lpsolve-5.5.2.11-3.fc39 changed a license from:
LGPL-2.1-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2
to:
LGPL-2.1-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2 AND BSD-3-clause
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
No, I am afraid that is not gist of that response. We still want
mdns4_minimal to be preferred variant and others to be configurable
manually. Sadly, they are all still needed, with minimal variants preferred.
and also --with-mdns should be possible in addition to existing 4 and 6
variants.
Hi Pavel,
With Avahi upstream maintainer hat on, I would say it still makes sense
to have separate mdns*_minimal and mdns? modules. I would say mdns
(non-minimal) should be rarely needed, because by default it should be
used just for *.local names. As I have wrote to referenced ticket, I
On 8/1/23 03:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 14:47 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi Fedora,
I have this ticket opened against authselect:
https://github.com/authselect/authselect/issues/334
I am not user of mdns myself, so I wonder if non-minimal version of mdns
is something
On 8/1/23 09:56, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi Pavel,
since authselect already advertises features for profiles regarding mdns
as:
--with-mdns4
--with-mdns6
it would be great if the profile feature logically matched what is going
to be enabled - --with-mdn4 will put 'mdns4' into 'hosts' in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228062
Bug ID: 2228062
Summary: Upgrade perl-Calendar-Simple to 2.0.3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Calendar-Simple
Status: NEW
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote on 2023/08/01 0:19:
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227489
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 8/1/23 09:56, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Fortunately Petr came up with solution for it (now nss-mdns does
always mDNS lookup for .local, but if there is DNS SOA for .local and
mDNS lookup didn't succeed, moves to DNS), so this scenario doesn't
need mdns.allow anymore, but IMO there could be other
Hi Pavel,
since authselect already advertises features for profiles regarding mdns as:
--with-mdns4
--with-mdns6
it would be great if the profile feature logically matched what is going
to be enabled - --with-mdn4 will put 'mdns4' into 'hosts' in
nsswitch.conf instead of current
49 matches
Mail list logo
