Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary

Hi folks! We're into Final freeze, so it's time for a blocker status mail. The current Final target date is 2023-10-17, meaning we'd need a release candidate by, er, Monday, so get your skates on everyone :) Action summary == Accepted blockers - 1. anaconda -

[Bug 2242322] perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242322 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: Specify koji build machine mem req via. spec file

On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 14:17 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:04 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 12:19 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:44 AM Martin Stransky > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello guys, > > > > > > > > Is

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3ee7f851c6 composer-1.10.27-1.el7 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a99c56df6a libptytty-2.0-4.el7 rxvt-unicode-9.31-1.el7 3

[Bug 2239043] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.12

[Bug 2239043] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',

[Bug 2239043] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239043 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1992574 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1992574=edit Update to 0.13 (#2239043) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Re: ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 3:45 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive > > belief, not actually deterministic). > > > > ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our

Re: ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive > belief, not actually deterministic). > > ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our builds. When we process > a batch of builds (triggered by a set of tag

Re: Occasional random Koji build failures only on ppc64le

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:23:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Circling back here... I downgraded the hosts yesterday and they have > been all checking in reliably as far as I can see. > > Are you still seeing any build issues? Not so far, but will let you know if I see any more. Rich. --

Re: Occasional random Koji build failures only on ppc64le

Circling back here... I downgraded the hosts yesterday and they have been all checking in reliably as far as I can see. Are you still seeing any build issues? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Specify koji build machine mem req via. spec file

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:04 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 12:19 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:44 AM Martin Stransky wrote: > > > > > Hello guys, > > > > > > Is there's a way how to set requested amount of ram for koji builders? > > > > > > I'd

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > These Fedora Project keys distribute in > are also affected: > > $ gpg --list-keys 6A2FAEA2352C64E5 > pub rsa4096 2013-12-16 [SCE] > 91E97D7C4A5E96F17F3E888F6A2FAEA2352C64E5 > uid

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:24:15PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On úterý 3. října 2023 21:48:24 CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:30:45AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > > > Well, in what shape is our "layered image" build system? Aren't we able > > > > Terrible, and

[Bug 2242322] perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242322 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:52 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> You are kindly invited to the meeting: >>ELN SIG on 2023-10-06 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat >> >> The meeting will be

Re: Live USB iso boot not working since Fedora 37, still broken in 39 Beta

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 16:19:12 +0200 Matthias Saou wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2023 13:51:03 -0700 > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > An update has been proposed: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f71507e281 > > > > The bug still needs to be accepted as an FE for this to make

Execute RPM dependency generators on the .spec file which ships them

I am still playing with idea of executing RPM dependency generators on the .spec file which ships them. I have created RPM RFE ticket quite a while ago here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/782 So for no luck with having this implemented. However, I think there is

Help running centpkg

I'm trying to build https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs using centpkg but am running into errors. I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild --with=bundled in the directory where I've cloned the https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs

redhat-lsb-5.0 is arriving to rawhide, epel 9 and updates-testing of F39

Hi, I finally finished firts version of redhat-lsb-5.0, I tried to collect all the commits that exist on the internet and organize them, I chose to fork the official lsb_release from linuxfoundation.org [1], and add the original redhat-lsb-4.1 and then apply some commits found on the internet

Re: ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 7:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 16:11 +0200, Jens Kuehnel wrote: > Sorry, my mailer did remove an imporant \n. > > Am 04.10.23 um 01:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > Hi Sérgio, > > > I believe you, but this version is an "right most" bump and is > > "just" > > one security fix, when in Centos Stream [1], 6

Re: Specify koji build machine mem req via. spec file

Julian Sikorski writes: > Does a hammer smaller than -g1 also exist for issues like: > > relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32 against `.debug_info' > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1615/107091615/build.log This is saying that mame is too large to fit in the default code

Re: Live USB iso boot not working since Fedora 37, still broken in 39 Beta

On Thu, 05 Oct 2023 13:51:03 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > > An update has been proposed: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f71507e281 > > The bug still needs to be accepted as an FE for this to make final, > though. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1382

Re: Orphaning all my packages

Sorry, my mailer did remove an imporant \n. Am 04.10.23 um 01:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto: Hi Sérgio, I believe you, but this version is an "right most" bump and is "just" one security fix, when in Centos Stream [1], 6 months ago we already have a higher version, this seems a work of security

Re: Orphaning all my packages

Am 04.10.23 um 01:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto: Hi Sérgio, I believe you, but this version is an "right most" bump and is "just" one security fix, when in Centos Stream [1], 6 months ago we already have a higher version, this seems a work of security team, not real development ... and if these

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231006.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20231005.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231006.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 8 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 45.61 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 07:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 05,

ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Over

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231006.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231005.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231006.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 143 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.61 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in > > > Rawhide

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

V Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:53:23PM +0200, Kamil Paral napsal(a): > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > It might be good to go through all the ones that were hit by this (it > > > wasn't just chrome) and

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > It might be good to go through all the ones that were hit by this (it > > wasn't just chrome) and indicate if they are now fixed. > > You can see a partial list in the common bug:

Re: -fstack-clash-protection needs to be disabled on riscv64 (#2242327)

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:58 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > I had to revert part of this commit: > > commit 0676a754f0508957f289eac5eda01091778cebc2 > Author: David Abdurachmanov > Date: Wed Jul 10 16:21:32 2019 +0300 > > rpmrc: update optflags for riscv64 > > Match other architectures

-fstack-clash-protection needs to be disabled on riscv64 (#2242327)

I had to revert part of this commit: commit 0676a754f0508957f289eac5eda01091778cebc2 Author: David Abdurachmanov Date: Wed Jul 10 16:21:32 2019 +0300 rpmrc: update optflags for riscv64 Match other architectures by adding missing flags: -fasynchronous-unwind-tables

Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in > > Rawhide for OCaml 5.1, plus some non-OCaml packages that have OCaml > > bindings. > >

Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in > Rawhide for OCaml 5.1, plus some non-OCaml packages that have OCaml > bindings. > > OCaml 5.1 is basically a small point release, but it does add back > native

[Bug 2240458] Perl 5.38 breaks Irssi locale

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Dennis Brendel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkretsch...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Bug 2240458] Perl 5.38 breaks Irssi locale

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Dennis Brendel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfab...@redhat.com --- Comment #7