yselkowitz merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Web-Scraper` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix flatpak build
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Web-Scraper/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-fb96496cba has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-1ab8d40ef4 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7d27ac4b4c has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2f468c4694 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-97dd7a0097 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-bc95604295 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:57 PM Qiyu Yan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It is nearly a full month since last mail. And seems that koji has recycled
> the side tags due to inactivity. I re-created them:
>
> f40-build-side-76474
> f39-build-side-76476
> f38-build-side-76478
>
> Seems that I don't have the
Hi,
After I upgraded an old netbook of mine to Fedora 39, the screen stays
black after the boot into multi-user.target is completed.
Now I cannot see anything on the screen, however I can access the machine
via SSH.
I had a hunch that plymouth might be the reason for this behaviour, so i
removed
Hi all,
It is nearly a full month since last mail. And seems that koji has
recycled the side tags due to inactivity. I re-created them:
* f40-build-side-76474
* f39-build-side-76476
* f38-build-side-76478
Seems that I don't have the permission to push to powerdevil and rebuild
it so
Hi all,
Does anybody know if eneville is still contributing to Fedora and / or
how to reach them?
c.f. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246443
I see no activity in dist-git, bodhi, koji, or pagure.io in the last 365 days.
Their packages seem to have been unmaintained for a while,
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], F39 Final RC-1.2 was declared NO-GO
in today's Go/No-GO meeting[2].
The next Fedora Linux 39 Final Go/No-Go meeting[3] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 2 November in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for
the "target date #3" milestone of 7 November. The release
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2023-10-26)
=
Meeting started by tstellar at 17:00:37 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-10-26/fesco.2023-10-26-17.00.log.html
.
Hi Neil,
Thanks a lot, much appreciated.
Kurt
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 2:04 PM Neil Hanlon wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> I'd be happy to help maintain this with you. I've actually been looking
> for something like Remind for a while now!
>
> Best,
> Neil
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 07:33 Kurt Keller
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-10-26 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:59 AM Jiri Hladky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Review Request: aespipe - AES encrypting or decrypting pipe
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244729
>
> Spec URL: https://jhladky.fedorapeople.org/aespipe.spec
> SRPM URL:
Hi,
Review Request: aespipe - AES encrypting or decrypting pipe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244729
Spec URL: https://jhladky.fedorapeople.org/aespipe.spec
SRPM URL: https://jhladky.fedorapeople.org/aespipe-2.4g-1.fc40.src.rpm
I'm trying to unretire the package. I have worked
Hi all,
A quick heads up that I built updated libpeas 2.0 for F39 and rawhide and
added a new libpeas1 compat package so that existing packages that use
libpeas 1.x continue working without needing changes - the libpeas API has
had a major revision in version 2.0 and it's not just the matter of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241707
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
In one week, 2023-11-02, or slightly later, I plan to build
python-pyrsistent 0.20.0[1] in Rawhide/F40. The list of changes is at
[2]. Notably, pyrsistent now freezes defaultdicts, which is considered a
backwards-incompatible change.
The only dependent package in Rawhide is python-sentry-sdk;
OLD: Fedora-39-20231025.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20231026.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Also if there are any instructions somewhere on how to build just point me
to them and I'll try to follow those. What I'd like to end up doing in the
end is building rpms that I can install/test. Our team is planning to add
an insights agent in RHEL and would like to be able to build/test in
When on the vpn it fails quickly with
⬢[midawson@toolbox nodejs]$ git checkout stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0
branch 'stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0' set up to track
'origin/stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0'.
Switched to a new branch 'stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0'
⬢[midawson@toolbox nodejs]$ centpkg
> Am 26.10.2023 um 03:44 schrieb Adam Williamson :
>
> On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop regarding F39 plans.
>>
>> As you may have noticed, we've slipped once or twice already (depending
>> on whether you count the "early
When I ran yesterday it seemed to hang and I think from the error message I
see today after leaving running it's because I was not on the vpn. I'll try
on a machine with vpn access to see if that helps.
In terms of --with-bundled Jan suggested I try that. I don't have a good
understanding of what
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231025.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231026.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 653.13 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2f468c4694 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2f468c4694
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-1ab8d40ef4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-1ab8d40ef4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246230
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-97dd7a0097 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-97dd7a0097
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-fb96496cba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fb96496cba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7d27ac4b4c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d27ac4b4c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246229
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hello,
Please anyone knows about any other channel to contact hno - Henrik
Nordstrom ?
I have not heard from him for like a year and I would like to take over the
primary admin role
for the radare2 package so the bugs get primarily assigned to me.
This is part of the non-responsive
On 10/25/23 19:14, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 25/10/23 12:54, Tomas Hrcka ha scritto:
This looks like a bug in bodhi.
Actually, it was done that way on purpose. The HTML rendered output
shows frozen releases in the same table of pending releases by a hack,
but for API purposes I just
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DBD-Pg` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-Pg/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DBD-Pg` that you
are following:
``
Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-Pg/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
39 matches
Mail list logo
