The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-64174e7a0d
gtkwave-3.3.118-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8edcddc48e
chromium-120.0.6099.216-1.el7
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258384
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-32f516fb21 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @tstellar:fedora.im at 2024-01-15 19:30:47
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: #3137 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Edition Images Using Kiwi in Koji
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:37:10PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 09:33:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> > > gcc, annobin, libtool
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 09:33:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> > gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> > tagged into rawhide shortly
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
>
> If there is anything you'd like to rebuild against
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256992
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257383
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257451
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Fixed
On 15-01-2024 09:52, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Any update? This ticket is still open:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235331
I believe the script is chugging along. I've seen a few more bugs being
closed the last couple of days.
-- Sandro
--
On 15-01-2024 18:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 01. 24 16:46, Maxwell G wrote:
Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:32 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Petr Menšík wrote:
> > systemd-resolved is unfortunately known to broken.
> [snip]
> > Dnsmasq does not break DNSSEC, systemd-resolved does.
> [snip]
> > Unfortunately broken are clients having systemd-resolved enabled.
>
> How
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, at 8:57 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
> dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
> EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
> are* leaf packages:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-01-15 19:30 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, at 8:57 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
> dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
> EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
> are* leaf packages:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:01 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a procedural question. Auditd-4.0 is ready for release. One of the
> major changes is splitting rule loading from logging in the service. IOW, it
> was one service doing both and now would be two services. Auditd would
On 15. 01. 24 16:46, Maxwell G wrote:
Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
Hello,
I have a procedural question. Auditd-4.0 is ready for release. One of the
major changes is splitting rule loading from logging in the service. IOW, it
was one service doing both and now would be two services. Auditd would depend
on the rule loader, but the rule loader would not depend
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 16:30 +0100, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
[...snip...]
Hi Siteshwar, thanks for working on this.
It looks like you're got the basic infrastructure of scanning working,
but the prototype seems to be missing some things that IMHO would be
essential to package maintainers
Petr Menšík wrote:
> systemd-resolved is unfortunately known to broken.
[snip]
> Dnsmasq does not break DNSSEC, systemd-resolved does.
[snip]
> Unfortunately broken are clients having systemd-resolved enabled.
How exactly is it broken? If you refer to:
Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
systemd-resolved is unfortunately known to broken. I would recommend
having systemd-resolved forwarded to dnsmasq, which can then be
forwarded further.
Dnsmasq does not break DNSSEC, systemd-resolved does. But this change
should create conflict with systemd-resolved only in case it was
On 15. 01. 24 15:09, Pavel Březina wrote:
Is there anything I should do to stop
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-287a88fffd from landing in
stable or is the negative karma enough?
I don't see "Actions" button to revoke it.
My experience with Bodhi is that the CLI is
On 1/15/24 14:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
are* leaf packages:
Hi all,
I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
are* leaf packages:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 01:15:12PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 14:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> > gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> > tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
>
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.7
Test week is happening from 2024-01-21 to 2024-01-28. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As usual,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:15 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 14:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> > gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> > tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258459
Bug ID: 2258459
Summary: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.63
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/XML-RSS
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-RSS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251190
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade perl-V to 0.18 |Upgrade perl-V to 0.19
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258457
Bug ID: 2258457
Summary: Upgrade perl-POSIX-strftime-Compiler to 0.46
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/POSIX-strftime-Compiler
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258455
Bug ID: 2258455
Summary: Upgrade perl-Plack to 1.0051
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Plack
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Plack
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 14:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
>
> If there is anything you'd like to rebuild against it
Hi!
The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
If there is anything you'd like to rebuild against it before the mass
rebuild (such as packages depending on Ada which like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258449
Bug ID: 2258449
Summary: Upgrade perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder to 1.80
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/DBIx-SearchBuilder
Status: NEW
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.50 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258448
Bug ID: 2258448
Summary: Upgrade perl-Cookie-Baker to 0.12
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Cookie-Baker
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251182
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3ddf87931c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3ddf87931c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
I pushed the changes that enable C type safety level handling once GCC
14 is merged and built it into the GCC 14 side tag (currently
f40-build-side-81394). I didn't add any conflicts with GCC 13 because
the incompatibility is only present if a package lowers the C type
safety level to 0.
Thanks,
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 15
January at 1300UTC in the NeuroFedora channel on Matrix. The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
Matrix in the Fedora meeting channel:
libguestfs-1.52.0-4.fc40 uses curl instead of wget{,2}:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111777873
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258384
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-32f516fb21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-32f516fb21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258384
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258384
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
David,
Thanks for notifying me about this build failure that happened while I
was on holiday last week:
http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/getfile?taskID=1594179=DEFAULT=root.log
http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/getfile?taskID=1594179=DEFAULT=build.log
I copied the relevant part from root.log &
46 matches
Mail list logo
