jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Scalar-List-Utils`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/5
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:37 +0100, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> OpenSSL 3.2.1 is now available in rawhide [1].
> There are no API/ABI changes in comparison with the last version in
> rawhide
> (3.1.4).
> This version (3.2.0 onwards) supports PQ algorithms that can be
> loaded
> through
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Nobody can *force* the KDE Plasma maintainers to do *anything*, just
> like nobody can force *any* packager to do anything.
That is exactly why nobody should be allowed to force plasma-workspace-x11
and kwin-x11 out of the Fedora repository.
We are not forcing the KDE
Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139
> gets implemented we will not have to remove anything.
Well, then kwin-x11 will also no longer depend on kwin and your argument
that it is a problem because it introduces a hard version lock
I
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > > > We are not banning nor deleting anything.
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_
> > > it.
> >
> >
> > you are removing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3f1f3dcef0
wordpress-5.1.18-1.el7
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-afdec12596
libebml-1.3.9-2.el7
4
In one week, 2024-02-15, or slightly later, I plan to update llhttp to
9.2.0[1] in (what will then be) F40/Branched and F41/Rawhide.
Based on the release notes[2], this release contains some bug fixes, but
no security fixes or exceptionally serious bug fixes. Therefore,
although this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-b6f0e855b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261452
Bug 2261452 depends on bug 2232294, which changed state.
Bug 2232294 Summary: perl-Wx needs a rebuild with
perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Config::gtk_3_2_2_uni_gcc_3_4)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Wx-0.9932-33.fc39
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > > Mass rebuild finished
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> One thing that seems to be overlooked in many of the posts on this thread:
>
> Nobody can *force* the KDE Plasma maintainers to do *anything*, just
> like nobody can force *any* packager to do anything. Fedora a
> volunteer-run
egoode opened a new pull-request against the project: `cpanspec` that you are
following:
``
Use `dnf repoquery --whatprovides`, not `dnf whatprovides`
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cpanspec/pull-request/2
--
___
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it.
>
>
> you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when
> many people , members of Fedora on devel
Hello everyone,
OpenSSL 3.2.1 is now available in rawhide [1].
There are no API/ABI changes in comparison with the last version in rawhide
(3.1.4).
This version (3.2.0 onwards) supports PQ algorithms that can be loaded
through
the OQS provider.
A few tests that needed some downstream tweaks have
On Thursday, 8 February 2024 20:21:19 CET Roy Bekken wrote:
> You mean the proposal from kde-sig that they wanted changing to plasma 6 and
> dropping X11 because they have no interest of supporting it?
>
Yes. Interest *and* resources.
> Don’t see why that should prevent someone else from
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 3 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
On torsdag 8. februar 2024 19:54:58 CET Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 February 2024 12:33:29 CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately ,
>
>
> Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139
> gets implemented we will
On Thursday, 8 February 2024 12:33:29 CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately ,
Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139 gets
implemented we will not have to remove anything.
(remember that the Change Proposal was approved)
>
Hi all,
I have just pushed a new years' release of Fedora Developer Portal.
It's minor, a thanks to the contributors that helped with reviews/fixes
nonetheless.
Revitalize web-app section about Rails. (#498)
* https://developer.fedoraproject.org/start/sw/web-app/rails.html
mention nodenv
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Scalar-List-Utils` that you are following:
``
Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Scalar-List-Utils/pull-request/5
--
___
perl-devel
Hi,
If you're interested in name resolution or mDNS, please review this bug
report:
Default authselect profiles break `hostname --fqdn`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257197
We are looking for feedback on whether to move nss-myhostname, and
possibly also nss-mdns4_minimal.
I
On 2/8/24 05:44 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
The Wayland protocol in question is this one:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/18
That said, even X11's version isn't widely supported. Typically,
support for this is plumbed through linking libSM, and GTK notably
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-02-09 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
* The status of and assigning tasks for the EL10 fork
> Source:
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-String-ShellQuote`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-ShellQuote/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-b6f0e855b0 (perl-Tk-804.036-13.fc39) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b6f0e855b0
--
You are receiving this mail
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-String-ShellQuote` that you are following:
``
Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-ShellQuote/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Usage` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Usage/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259166
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|robinlee.s...@gmail.com
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-Usage` that
you are following:
``
Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-Usage/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2024-02-09 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/
--
___
devel
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it.
you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when
many people , members of Fedora on devel mailing list, express that
they want have X11 , in fact we have
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:12 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Steve Cossette wrote:
> > But to be fair as well, that doesn't exist on Windows (Windows can
> > reopen the programs you are working on but it doesn't save what you were
> > doing)
>
> And even that, it does not do automatically,
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 16:20 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 14:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > > Running with rtkit-daemon stoped and masked prevents the main evo
> > > process being prioritized and consequently killed with higher load.
> > >
> > > The fact that the
37 matches
Mail list logo
