Hello Fedora,
My name is Penn Bauman. I have been using Linux for 8 years, Fedora for
4 year, and I currently use Fedora Silverblue.
I have been packaging several pieces of software in Copr [1] for years
and I think they are ready to be included in mainline Fedora.
My initial goal is to add L
Hi Orion,
Thank you for pointing me to the Bugzilla page. Could you please add me to
the packager and/or qa group for my FAS account (pgrosu) so I can log into
f40-test.fedorainfracloud.org to test this out.
Thanks,
Paul
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 4:45 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 5/9/25 23:37
Hello,
I recently updated Unhide in rawhide. The license tag has been updated as
follows:
GPL-3.0-or-later AND MIT
Previous tag:
GPL-3.0-only
Regards,
Robby Callicotte
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
Hi folks,
A quick fyi that F40 will go EOL tomorrow, May 13 2025. Bugzillas opened
against this version have already received warning message that this date
was approaching ~2 weeks ago, so this is just another heads up that after
tomorrow, all open bugs against F40 will be automatically closed.
Hello all,
Fedora Linux 40 will go end of life for updates and support on
2025-05-13.
No more updates of any kind, including security updates or security
Announcements will be available for Fedora Linux 40 after this
date.
No pending updates for Fedora Linux 40 will be pushed to stable.
Fedora Li
On 5/12/25 12:31 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Nikita Popov:
>
>> In f42 the main llvm package switched to installing all files under a
>> /usr/lib{64}/llvmN prefix and
>> providing symlinks in the default prefix, to align the contents between the
>> versioned and unversioned
>> packages. What w
Hi everyone,
as announced a week ago [1], I orphaned the following packages today:
rpms/aws-c-auth
rpms/aws-c-compression
rpms/aws-c-event-stream
rpms/aws-checksums
rpms/aws-c-http
rpms/aws-c-io
rpms/aws-c-mqtt
rpms/aws-c-s3
rpms/aws-c-sdkutils
rpms/ec2-instance-connect
rpms/s2n-tls
Dom
(FAS: wo
Ah, that helps! I see now. The nested `if` statements had thrown me off.
I missed the fact it's the %{with_sysusers} check that's falling back to the
oldschool method of directly using user creation commands if not satisfied. I'd
been reading it as if it fell back to that method if the version c
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 12:58:58PM -, Alex Haydock wrote:
> Fedora Atomic bug documented here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359764
>
> I think this bug comes from the systemtap .spec's use of traditional (non
> sysusers.d) methods to handle user creation. I tried to author
V Sun, May 11, 2025 at 05:40:55PM -, Ryan Bach via devel napsal(a):
> Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 09:32:18PM -, Ryan Bach via devel napsal(a):
> > > failed to add subkeys for
> > > /var/cache/PackageKit/43/metadata/google-chrome-rawhide-x86_64/linux_signing_key.pub
> > >
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I did come across this:
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D32668
>
> which seems promising, but not sure I'll be able to adapt that to
> SuiteSparse or not.
That looks like the right approach in any case: export the static targets to
a separate file and include that file w
I corrected a license tag in perl-Cairo-GObject package from
"LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+" to "LGPL-2.1-or-later".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250511.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250512.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.33 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 2025/05/11 22:42, Orion Poplawski wrote:
To be clear, I would prefer to be able to still package and ship the
static libraries in a separate package. Although I am considering
just dropping the static build as well. But I think the HPC /
scientific community still has a reasonably high in
* Nikita Popov:
> In f42 the main llvm package switched to installing all files under a
> /usr/lib{64}/llvmN prefix and
> providing symlinks in the default prefix, to align the contents between the
> versioned and unversioned
> packages. What we were not aware of at the time is that rpm's suppor
15 matches
Mail list logo