OLD: Fedora-eln-20250627.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250628.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
So I went and looked at the proposal for i686 support and one of the
possible solutions was to use the content resolver to work out what would
need to be rebuilt for i686 or at least to get an idea of what might need
to remain in i686 builds.
I took a stab at it and got a pull request together for
* Davide Cavalca:
> On 2025-06-24 22:02, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Are you suggesting to move RHEL 11 development away from Fedora/ELN to
>> CentOS Stream? Wouldn't that be implied by this approach?
>
> Not at all. My point was that if you want a platform to run
> experiments, the CentOS ISA SIG s
Hi,
Many thanks to Alexander Bokovoy and Pierre Rogier:
* I've just upgraded with the proposed single command, everything work like a
charm.
* This is a DS used as part of miniature (and not critical) freeipa instance.
Answering some of my questions that weren't so clear
I wasn't sure if exporti
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> > To make the discussion concrete, could you grab a list of the actual
> > libraries that we're talking about here? I'm interested in how hard
> > it would be to adapt them to cross compila
Le ven. 27 juin 2025 à 14:40, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> > > > To make the discussion concrete, could you g
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> > > To make the discussion concrete, could you grab a list of the actual
> > > libraries that we're talking about here
V Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:43:25AM +0200, Frederic Berat napsal(a):
> Hey all,
>
> While packaging the new Automake, I ran into something that got me
> thinking. A bug (since fixed in 1.18.1) made it try to rebuild the info
> documentation from its Texinfo sources, which implied a new BuildRequires
V Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Pavol Sloboda napsal(a):
> My question is: How to handle referencing the Licenses of the fonts since
> they are binary files and there does not seem to be any sign of a license
> mentioned anywhere near them? I do not use these fonts during the build nor
> d
On Fri, Jun 27 2025 at 11:21:22 +02:00:00, Milan Crha
wrote:
* chatty, elementary-calendar and pidgin-chime only need rebuild
in the side tag
Chatty is now taken care of.
Regards,
Tomi
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Hey all,
While packaging the new Automake, I ran into something that got me
thinking. A bug (since fixed in 1.18.1) made it try to rebuild the info
documentation from its Texinfo sources, which implied a new BuildRequires:
texinfo dependency on packages that depend on Automake.
This got me wonder
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 10:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll do the switch to the dnf5 plugin in rawhide, for the Fedora 43.
Hi,
it took longer than expected, but it finally happened and the rawhide
with gnome-software-49~alpha-1.fc43 uses dnf5 instead of PackageKit
under the hood.
There w
On Wed, 2025-06-18 at 06:54 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> chatty-0:0.8.8-2.fc43.src
> elementary-calendar-0:8.0.0-2.fc42.src
> elementary-mail-0:8.0.0-2.fc42.src
> evolution-0:3.56.2-1.fc43.src
> evolution-ews-0:3.56.2-1.fc43.src
> evolution-rspam-0:0.6.0-48.fc43.src
> folk
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250626.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250627.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 23.87 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hello, I have recently done a rebase of mysql-connector-python from 8.0.21
to 8.0.33 and among the many changes made in the rebase was the inclusion
of a couple of types of buildable documentation (e.g.: html, man pages,
e.t.c.). A problem arises when I started looking into the licensing for all
th
Hi All,
Am 27.06.25 um 00:22 schrieb Davide Cavalca:
On 2025-06-26 11:14, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Erico Nunes wrote:
This is on the Asahi FAQ, so I think Asahi in particular is not
going to
be a convincing argument and use case:
https://asahilinux.org/docs/project/faq/#i-am-having-perfo
16 matches
Mail list logo