OLD: Fedora-eln-20250827.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250828.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Wed, Aug 27 2025 at 01:52:46 PM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Looks like gmime is also obsolete, replaced by gmime30. We should
drop that as well.
Hi,
After a second pass, I identified a few additional packages that we
will drop:
gmime, glycin-loaders, gnome-doc-utils, seahors
Looks like gmime is also obsolete, replaced by gmime30. We should drop
that as well.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs
From what I see, no replacement was ever added to the boot options, so none
exists now (although it is performed by the kernel at boot). Considering that
https://unix.stackexchange.com/revisions/439769/5#:~:text=Yes%2C%20there%20is%2C%20and%20it%20is%20now%20Memtest86+%20v6%20itself.%20This%20is%
On Wed, Aug 27 2025 at 09:57:08 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
almost all of the packages on this list
(A few exceptions: gnome-packagekit, gnome-nettool, and
gnome-screenshot still have non-archived git repos.)
--
___
devel mailing list
As primary maintainer of libIDL, one of the listed obsolete packages,
I’d like to take this opportunity to go ahead and let go of it, i.e.,
orphan it myself. I’ve CC’ed the individual co-maintainers on this email.
The libIDL package is used directly by ORBit2 and seamonkey; ORBit2 is
also on t
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-08-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/11103/
--
___
devel mailin
On Wed, Aug 27 2025 at 12:05:00 PM +02:00:00, Michal Schorm
wrote:
Could you please check which of them are used by Cinnamon spin?
Hi,
No, but Cinnamon maintainers are welcome to check the list and own
whatever packages they need.
Just keep in mind almost all of the packages on this lis
On Wed, Aug 27 2025 at 11:21:29 AM -00:00:00, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
I haven't really worked with GTK in any capacity, but I could try my
hand
at maintaining the package (unless someone more experienced steps up).
Thanks! I don't think you actually require much experience to own this
p
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 3:32 AM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On 8/24/25 2:59 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > If nobody steps up, the
> > package can still be retired from Fedora 43 until the start of the
> > final freeze (October 7).
>
> Automatic package retirements as part of the orphaned packages proces
> - gtk2
There's still a lot of packages using GTK2.
$ dnf repoquery --releasever=43 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='*-source'
--whatrequires gtk2-devel | wc -l
189
$ dnf repoquery --releasever=43 --whatrequires gtk2 | wc -l
339
I haven't really worked with GTK in any capacity, but I could try m
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 25 11:44, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 25 11:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
But here the ask was to assign a real maintainer to the
freeipa package. Presu
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 6:46 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hi folks,
> we have published a release criteria change proposal at Fedora Discussion:
>
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-limit-release-blocking-status-of-bios-systems-to-just-certain-scenarios/160757
>
> This is a notification
Using the Cinnamon spin, I see I have a number of them.
I don't know whether they are necessary.
But I have a gnome-screenshot without the gnome-shell. Installing the
gnome-shell would use another 400 MB and over 50 packages.
Could you please check which of them are used by Cinnamon spin?
My in
On 27. 08. 25 11:44, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 25 11:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
But here the ask was to assign a real maintainer to the freeipa package.
Presumably sch real person would be from your t
Hi folks,
gnome-sig is doing a cleanup of its packages, which has been discussed in
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/483
To begin, we are interested in orphaning clearly obsolete packages under
gnome-sig.
We discussed starting the orphaning process of the packages below a week
from now
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 25 11:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
But here the ask was to assign a real maintainer to the freeipa
package. Presumably sch real person would be from your team.
Sure. I cannot do that myself other than
On 27. 08. 25 11:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
But here the ask was to assign a real maintainer to the freeipa package.
Presumably sch real person would be from your team.
Sure. I cannot do that myself other than orphaning the package and
taking it again
OLD: Fedora-43-20250826.n.1
NEW: Fedora-43-20250827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Срд, 27 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 25 8:36, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Аўт, 26 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 08. 25 8:46, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
The package
still belongs to 'orphan' and none of the package maintainers received a
note about it.
They should eventual
On 27. 08. 25 8:36, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Аўт, 26 жні 2025, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 08. 25 8:46, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
The package
still belongs to 'orphan' and none of the package maintainers received a
note about it.
They should eventually receive the "Orphaned packages looking
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250826.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:22
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:14
Upgraded packages: 10
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:11.35
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:27 PM Maxwell G wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I don't use Gmail, but I've heard about this problem before, so it'd be
> good to try and workaround it. Would it be helpful if I sent a separate
> email that only had the affected maintainers BCCed and sent another one
> to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
