Re: Anyone working on Xen on F29

2018-10-25 Thread Aaron Gray
Update On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 02:33, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get Xen working properly on rawhide / F29 Beta. > > I had one instillation on F29 that worked straight away with :- > > sudo yum groupinstall 'Virtualization' sudo yum install xen > >

Anyone working on Xen on F29

2018-10-25 Thread Aaron Gray
, Aaron -- Aaron Gray Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

test post

2018-10-22 Thread Aaron Gray
test post -- Aaron Gray Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-04-10 Thread Aaron Gray
On 24 March 2014 19:26, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:21:51PM +, Aaron Gray wrote: The HP Dl140 G3 has MCA based graphics. F20 seems to be mainly fixed apart from MCA based Anaconda, which gets the resolution wrong, the screen being too small

Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-04-10 Thread Aaron Gray
On 17 March 2014 22:02, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 09:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 20:07 +, Aaron Gray wrote: I am looking for someone to walk me through the Anaconda source as I need to understand it and cannot find where its

Re: repo XML file schemas

2014-03-28 Thread Aaron Gray
Are there XML Schemas for the repo files available anywhere please ? Aaron On 28 March 2014 08:32, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: On 2014-03-27, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: The Fedora XML repo file schemas seem to have disappeared. metadata xmlns=http://linux.duke.edu

repo XML file schemas

2014-03-27 Thread Aaron Gray
Hi, The Fedora XML repo file schemas seem to have disappeared. metadata xmlns=http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common; xmlns:rpm=http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm; packages=14364 duke.edu no longer seem to host them ! Looking for a response, Aaron -- devel mailing list

Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-03-24 Thread Aaron Gray
, 2014-03-17 at 09:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 20:07 +, Aaron Gray wrote: I am looking for someone to walk me through the Anaconda source as I need to understand it and cannot find where its 'main' is and how it launches X Windows as I need to work out why

Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-03-14 Thread Aaron Gray
Thanks for putting me right, will have to look into this properly. I was mainly looking at Anaconda and F20 for my HP DL140 G3 servers which there are problems with the video with. On 14 March 2014 01:05, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 14:38 +, Aaron Gray

Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-03-13 Thread Aaron Gray
Not sure yet but Anaconda has some specialised support for CPU's presumably the processor name at a minimum. On 12 March 2014 21:55, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Okay think I have got a handle on it now, the main

Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-03-12 Thread Aaron Gray
Hi, I am looking for someone to walk me through the Anaconda source as I need to understand it and cannot find where its 'main' is and how it launches X Windows as I need to work out why the main installer is not working on my HP D140 G3's with MCA video controllers.

Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.

2014-03-12 Thread Aaron Gray
Okay think I have got a handle on it now, the main python file in the root does not have a .py extension. Very helpful ! Another interesting thing is there is no ARM support which I will be needing at some point. Aaron On 12 March 2014 20:07, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875494] X.509: Cert 81941e8b9ea74f946d7e18b59d61deb5423e411e is not yet valid Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875496] MODSIGN: Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate (-129) Apr 25 21:19:08 localhost kernel: [0.875445] X.509: Cert

Re: Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
On 1 May 2013 19:13, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875494] X.509: Cert 81941e8b9ea74f946d7e18b59d61deb5423e411e is not yet valid Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875496] MODSIGN: Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate (-129

Re: Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
Actual message Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate On 1 May 2013 19:25, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 May 2013 19:13, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875494] X.509: Cert

Re: Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
On 1 May 2013 19:38, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Actual message Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multipleid=861322 Sorry for the noise, should have checked bugzilla ! Aaron On 1 May 2013 19:25, Aaron Gray

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
Yes I noticed that. One possibility would to so a separate server based distro like Ubuntu does, and maybe a developer one too ? Just a thought. On 1 May 2013 21:03, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: The F19 DVD is currently *way* over size. (i686: 417MB, x86_64: 311MB). That's almost

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-22 Thread Aaron Gray
I have updated and added debugging information and screen shots on these two bugs on F18 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951643 and F19Live https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951648 On 14 April 2013 17:23, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: I have put in two

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-14 Thread Aaron Gray
I have put in two bugzilla entries :- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951643 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951648 On for F18 and another for F19-Live as they seem to be different results. Aaron On 5 April 2013 12:58, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-05 Thread Aaron Gray
On 5 April 2013 06:59, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: On 2013-04-05 01:38 (GMT-0400) Aaron Gray composed: Its quite strange. The Samsung monitor is 1920 x 1200 What other modes does it support? Quite a range AFAICT. This problem on F18 arose using a smaller 1280 by 1024

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-05 Thread Aaron Gray
960 - VESA, 1280 X 1024 - VESA, 1600 X 1200 - VESA, 1920 X 1200 On 5 April 2013 12:41, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 April 2013 06:59, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: On 2013-04-05 01:38 (GMT-0400) Aaron Gray composed: Its quite strange

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Gray
Okay a bit more info :- F17 Anaconda is running at the same descent resolution as F16. On F18 '/var/log/Xorg.0.log' is reporting VESA. I will try rolling an F19 ISO next just to rule out that its not a transient bug. In parallel I will see if I can track down what is causing the problem. Any

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Gray
broken, or the Rage XL driver being removed or broken. On 4 April 2013 21:44, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/04/13 12:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 20:38:14 +0100, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Okay a bit more info :- F17 Anaconda

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Gray
Thanks Adam. I am just downloading the https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC4/ alpha to try first before looking any deeper at the actual RPMS code. On 4 April 2013 23:29, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/04/13 03:10 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: AFAICT it does

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Gray
Great ! Now I find its too large to fit on a single sided DVD. Will try live desktop instead :- https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC4/Live/i386/Fedora-19-Alpha-TC4-i686-Live-Desktop-19-1.iso On 4 April 2013 23:53, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Adam

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Gray
Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/04/13 06:06 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Great ! Now I find its too large to fit on a single sided DVD. Will try live desktop instead :- https://dl.fedoraproject.org/**pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC4/** Live/i386/Fedora-19-Alpha-TC4-**i686-Live-Desktop-19-1

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Gray
Its quite strange. The Samsung monitor is 1920 x 1200 Rage XL is 1600 x 1200 Xorg.0.log does not really say much of any help AFAICR. I'll post a copy later when back at the machine. On 5 April 2013 02:55, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/04/13 06:41 PM, Aaron Gray wrote

[F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-03 Thread Aaron Gray
I am getting 1/4 of a screens worth of the Anaconda and runtime display on F18. It worked alright on F14 and F16. It seems to be to do with the HP DL 140 G3's ATI Rage XL video controller. The main install option gives garbage graphics and the basic graphics install option give 1/4 or less of the

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-03 Thread Aaron Gray
I am a C/C++ coder and would love to be brought up to speed with what is required to be able fix bugs and problems in new releases for the hardware I posse. It seems things do get broken or left behind all too often. The nice IBM PowerPC based RAID cards in my older Fujitsu-Siemens 970's worked to

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-03 Thread Aaron Gray
Can anyone offer me advice where to look and what to look out for with this ATI Rage XL problem, it was not in F16. I will try rolling a F19 ISO if I can get that together and try that just in case the problem has fixed itself. I will also follow up the Ubuntu lead. Thanks for the replies, any

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

2013-04-03 Thread Aaron Gray
tried making configuration modifications to X before but with very little joy. On 3 April 2013 22:31, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 22:22:12 +0100, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: I am a C/C++ coder and would love to be brought up to speed with what

Re: Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

2013-02-15 Thread Aaron Gray
On 14 February 2013 19:16, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Feb 14, 2013 12:03 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Feb 9, 2013 3:47 AM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 February 2013 16:41, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

2013-02-14 Thread Aaron Gray
On 14 February 2013 14:13, Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 05:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS access for PXEBOOTing of Fedora18 please to go with the PXEBOOT HOWTO :- http

Re: Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

2013-02-09 Thread Aaron Gray
On 7 February 2013 16:41, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.comwrote: On 02/07/2013 04:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS access for PXEBOOTing of Fedora18 please to go with the PXEBOOT HOWTO

Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

2013-02-07 Thread Aaron Gray
Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS access for PXEBOOTing of Fedora18 please to go with the PXEBOOT HOWTO :- http://linux-sxs.org/internet_serving/pxeboot.html Hope someone can help, I put I message on the User List but got

Is there a Wayland/Weston/XWayland HOWTO for Fedora ?

2013-01-21 Thread Aaron Gray
Hi, I have had a look at the existing Wayland documentation, but cannot find anything on running it on Fedora. I am aware of the Fedora packages, versions, and GIT repositories. I would like to be an early tester and adopter. But am wondering how I go about starting you Weston and XWayland in

Re: Problem updating to Rawhide from F18

2013-01-20 Thread Aaron Gray
On 20 January 2013 11:13, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 06:53:27PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 01/19/2013 04:58 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Error: Package: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19.i686 (fedora) Requires: libnl-genl-3.so.200

Problem updating to Rawhide from F18

2013-01-19 Thread Aaron Gray
I have tried the following from :- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide # yum install fedora-release-rawhide # yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync gives :- ... -- Running transaction check --- Package NetworkManager.i686 1:0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19 will be a

Re: Problem updating to Rawhide from F18

2013-01-19 Thread Aaron Gray
On 20 January 2013 00:58, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: I have tried the following from :- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide?rd=Rawhide # yum install fedora-release-rawhide # yum --releasever=rawhide distro-sync gives :- ... -- Running transaction

Whats happened to SELinux commands and directories on F18 ?

2012-12-30 Thread Aaron Gray
Hi, I have tried to get audit2allow command and to disable SELinux using 'echo 0 /selinux/enforce' but neither seem to work. Can someone point me in the right direction with SELinux on F18 please ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

FYI: Fedora 3.6.10-4.fc18 hanging on startup on VM Player

2012-12-29 Thread Aaron Gray
Hi, Hope this is not noise... Just installed Fedora 3.6.10-4.fc18 32 bit on 32 bit VM Player on 64 bit Windows 8 machine and it hangs on the blue background. Will try 64 bit VM Player tomorrow. Aaron -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FYI: Fedora 3.6.10-4.fc18 hanging on startup on VM Player - VirtualBox works okay though

2012-12-29 Thread Aaron Gray
On 30 December 2012 03:39, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hope this is not noise... Just installed Fedora 3.6.10-4.fc18 32 bit on 32 bit VM Player on 64 bit Windows 8 machine and it hangs on the blue background. Will try 64 bit VM Player tomorrow. There was no 64 bit

Re: Wireshark-gnome not working on F16

2011-12-07 Thread Aaron Gray
On 6 December 2011 20:18, Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de wrote: Hi. On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:15:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote Couldn't run /usr/sbin/dumpcap in child process: Permission denied Are you a member of the 'wireshark' group? Try running 'usermod -a -G wireshark

Re: TFTP not working on F15 as well as updated F14

2011-10-12 Thread Aaron Gray
On 12 October 2011 04:22, Nick Jones nick.jo...@network-box.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 21:22 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: I have two F15 machines one a desktop

Re: TFTP not working on F15 as well as updated F14

2011-10-12 Thread Aaron Gray
On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3 desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop. TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15

Re: TFTP not working on F15 as well as updated F14

2011-10-12 Thread Aaron Gray
On 12 October 2011 14:57, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3 desktop and a laptop not running the new

Re: TFTP not working on F15 as well as updated F14

2011-10-12 Thread Aaron Gray
On 12 October 2011 19:30, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: Okay. Your configurations are the default configs (with the notable exception of enabling the xinetd.d/tftp service). On my x86_64 laptop running Fedora 16, with iptables reasonably normal, I installed tftp and tftp-server,

Ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE environment on another machine

2011-10-11 Thread Aaron Gray
Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE environment on another machine rather than from the internet ( download.fedora.redhat.com) ? Many thanks, Aaron -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE environment on another machine

2011-10-11 Thread Aaron Gray
On 11 October 2011 13:51, Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.comwrote: Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE environment on another machine rather than from the internet

Re: Ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE environment on another machine

2011-10-11 Thread Aaron Gray
On 11 October 2011 14:34, Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org wrote: Am 11.10.2011 15:20, schrieb Aaron Gray: Thanks, still needs TFTP but this could simplify things a lot. If you want to circumvent using TFTP and you are using gPXE (or a PXE boot ROM that supports booting from HTTP) you could

TFTP not working on F15 as well as updated F14

2011-10-11 Thread Aaron Gray
I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3 desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop. TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was not working on the updated F14. It worked on F14 before the update. I installed two servers using PXE using it.

Re: TFTP not working on F15 as well as updated F14

2011-10-11 Thread Aaron Gray
On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3 desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop. TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15

Re: TFTP stopped working on F14

2011-10-08 Thread Aaron Gray
On 7 October 2011 18:38, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 October 2011 18:29, Soham Chakraborty sohamwonderpik...@gmail.comwrote: Is it possible for you to check the connection status by netstat when you transfer a file? Also, once you start transferring a file, can you get

Re: Fwd: TFTP stopped working on F14

2011-10-07 Thread Aaron Gray
Reply inline :- 2011/10/7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com On 10/07/2011 03:38 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Hi, I think this is a development problem. I have tried everything obvious to get TFTP to work on F14 but to no avail. Could some one in the know look in to this please. I

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

2011-05-05 Thread Aaron Gray
On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user list. I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop is telling me and what ifconfig

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

2011-05-05 Thread Aaron Gray
On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said: On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

2011-05-05 Thread Aaron Gray
On 5 May 2011 19:07, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said: On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2011

Re: Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

2011-05-05 Thread Aaron Gray
On 5 May 2011 19:27, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said: On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: ... $ ifconfig eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:26:18:E4:99:77 ... eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:ED:05:35

Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

2011-04-30 Thread Aaron Gray
Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user list. I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop is telling me and what ifconfig is telling me and what 'service network restart' is telling me. Do I have to do a reinstall or is there some way