sh
If you look at my attachment in my previous email I have them set that way.
Troy
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:38 PM Alex Talaran <mailto:atala...@gmail.com>> wrote:
i dont need them but wasnt sure if required for epel to keep things
complete and similar to the base package.
want the
man pages?
Troy
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:40 AM Alex Talaran <mailto:atala...@gmail.com>> wrote:
attached a new spec using 4.10 which should match el9 (desired distro
version) as you noted.
srpm and rpm still seem to build fine without man pages, still not sur
-agents that is in your version of RHEL.
So for RHEL8 (or compatible) it needs to be version 4.2.1. For RHEL 9
it needs to be 4.10.0
We need to start with the correct version of fence-agents and work from
there.
Troy
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:03 AM Alex Talaran <mailto:atala...@gmail.
at 10:03 AM Alex Talaran <mailto:atala...@gmail.com>> wrote:
i was able to get this built and installable if anyone wants to help
test or maintain it.
an issue exists with the man pages not being built still but im not
sure
how the makefile target works for
just a
(first for me) stripped down and modified upstream spec file.
On 2022-07-20 08:47, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Alex Talaran wrote:
i ended up with the same error with that change.
I am sorry my suggestion did not help.
I don't have a Red Hat compatible machine newer
per a previous thread i took a shot at cleaning up the fence-agents rpm
to only include the missing agents and make a new package. i am having
some issues with the source url and getting it to build. the srpm is ok,
but when i try to rebuild it into a proper rpm i get the following
(output
] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:15 AM Alex Talaran wrote:
Carl,
it looks like this will not be included in centos stream per RH. so
looks like option 2 or 3 would be next right? to help the greater
community 3 might be better
.
Are you interested in creating and maintaining that? It's described
in further detail in the EPEL docs [0], although it's lacking
examples.
[0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:15 AM Alex Talaran wrote:
Carl,
it looks like
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote:
would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the
existing package please?
i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at
the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented
was this the right place to open the bug or can it be moved to the right
spot please?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098360
On 2022-06-17 16:28, Carl George wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote:
would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get
would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the
existing package please?
i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at
the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in the
spec file [2]. someone else asked about it [1][3] and
11 matches
Mail list logo
