On 09/12/2016 01:21 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 12.9.2016 v 17:48 Basil Mohamed Gohar napsal(a):
>> On 09/11/2016 02:19 PM, stan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 22:04:22 -0400
>>> Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgo...@librevideo.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 09/11/2016 02:19 PM, stan wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 22:04:22 -0400
> Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgo...@librevideo.org> wrote:
>
>
>>> On 09/08/2016 03:44 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
>>>> Even since I installed F24 on both my desktop as well
On 09/11/2016 02:19 PM, stan wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 22:04:22 -0400
> Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgo...@librevideo.org> wrote:
>
>
>>> On 09/08/2016 03:44 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
>>>> Even since I installed F24 on both my desktop as well
directly relevant.
> If it is, there is a recent Fedora magazine article on applying kernel
> patches.
>
>
>
> On 09/08/2016 03:44 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
>> Even since I installed F24 on both my desktop as well as my laptop I've
>> noticed a severe performance degradation
Even since I installed F24 on both my desktop as well as my laptop I've
noticed a severe performance degradation in terms of video playback.
One point of note is that I did an upgrade from F22->F23->F24, only
using F23 for the upgrade process.
I've noticed this performance issue in both MATE (my
After seeing my phone (Samsung Galaxy S III) picking-up some media
shared from my mother's Windows 7 laptop and the experience being
reasonably positive (it more-or-less worked to play videos), I decided
to try my hand at getting this to work in Fedora 22. I've been
generally pleased with GNOME
I have found that in Fedora 20 I've been unable to keep my SSH server at
my home up for long periods of time. I will enable it with systemctl
and start it, and it will work for a time, but then later days (after,
maybe, 3 or so days) it will be unavailable and I'll have to restart it.
The only
On 11/14/2014 08:49 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/14/2014 02:46 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
The only non-standard thing I can think I'm doing is running SSH on
another port, and I've already gotten SELinux to accept that fact. The
issue is not that it won't even connect. It's
On 2014-10-13 10:23 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
I've searched for bugs related to the specific problems I've been having, and
I've not been able to find anything that describes what I'm seeing.
I have an HP EliteBook 840 that also comes with an UltraDock, to which I've
plugged
On 2014-10-13 05:18 PM, David Airlie wrote:
I've searched for bugs related to the specific problems I've been
having, and
I've not been able to find anything that describes what I'm seeing.
I have an HP EliteBook 840 that also comes with an UltraDock, to which
I've
plugged-in two external
I've searched for bugs related to the specific problems I've been
having, and I've not been able to find anything that describes what I'm
seeing.
I have an HP EliteBook 840 that also comes with an UltraDock, to which
I've plugged-in two external monitors and I use in conjunction with the
On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, David Airlie wrote:
I've searched for bugs related to the specific problems I've been having, and
I've not been able to find anything that describes what I'm seeing.
I have an HP EliteBook 840 that also comes with an UltraDock, to which I've
plugged-in two external
On 04/10/2014 01:23 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
On 9 April 2014 22:10, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/09/2014 08:42 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Given the number of packages that ship localization, this seems like it
would have a pretty dramatic effect on metadata size. Is this a
On 04/09/2014 03:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
I think less than 0.1% of users ever look into /usr/share/doc, but I
don't have any data to back this up.
I think I must fit into this 0.1% (and I am not disputing that that is
the correct ratio, either) because I definitely use /usr/share/doc, but
On 11/02/2013 12:46 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 11/2/13 10:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
مصعب الزعبي wrote:
Then do new rule to write proxies instead of proxy, at Fedora packaging
guidlines.
Renaming packages, censoring descriptions etc. in Fedora at the whims of
governments (of countries
On 08/27/2013 11:20 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:54 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms
support and at the *same time* adopt the policy
From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms
On 08/28/2013 10:41 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:13:09AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
Sorry to come out of left field like this, but would the system profile
info we collect on install be useful in determining the weight of the
need for some of these drivers
As long as we're reminiscing, for what it's worth, Blueman was the
*only* way I could reliably get A2DP/High quality audio to work with my
wife's Bluetooth headphones (Nokia BH-503) until Fedora 19. It is a
nice utility, no doubt, but now I can get the behavior I want/need using
just the MATE
On 06/12/2013 11:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:12:07 +0200
Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972548
This update should fix the dependency issue.
mate-desktop-1.6.1-7.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
I cannot update with yum upgrade due to some dependency issues related,
it seems, to the mate-desktop package obsoleting a few other packages.
I am including the full output because results can be related to
loaded-plugins and possibly 3rd-party repositories.
It seems that some *-devel packages
I thought that this might be an issue with incompatible hardware, as I
was trying to install Fedora 18 on an old Dell (Celeron D processor) I'd
bought for my mother that she was no longer using. However, I got an
error when attempting to install when the process was probing the drives.
I thought
On 05/13/2013 12:50 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Any tips
on what I can do to make a proper report out of this would be most
appreciated, or just let me know if installs to PATA/EIDE systems are
just no longer supported.
I've got a i686 box with only PATA, and two root partitions of
On 02/21/2013 12:31 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Feb 20, 2013 6:29 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar
basilgo...@librevideo.org mailto:basilgo...@librevideo.org wrote:
For a while now the package mate-file-archiver has had a
dependency problem and cannot be updated. I've opened a ticket about
it (https
For a while now the package mate-file-archiver has had a dependency
problem and cannot be updated. I've opened a ticket about it
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908137) but it has received
no response for over two weeks. I am not sure that the package is
terribly important, but
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18 Spherical Cow.
My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
services like NAT, UPnP, DDNS,
On 12/27/2012 11:40 AM, Antonio wrote:
Il 27/12/2012 16:27, Basil Mohamed Gohar ha scritto:
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18
Spherical Cow. My internet connection implicates an outdoor
antenna equipped
On 12/19/2012 12:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:58 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald
On 07/01/2012 06:34 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Who intend to package this?This software is useful and helpful for
server admins.
--
Best Regards,
Christopher Meng--'Cicku'
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and Contributor of GNU.
Blog:http://cicku.me
Twitter:@cickumqt
Hope you
On 06/24/2012 05:07 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
Users with existing revelation configurations can blow away
.gconf/apps/revelation and relogin to avoid the errors and reconfig
revelation in the process. But clearly that is not
On 05/31/2012 10:52 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com said:
Under this model there will be two classes of distributor: One which
loads easily on systems, and one which requires the additional effort
of disabling secure boot or installing user keys.
On 05/31/2012 12:06 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:04 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
If you're looking for a mantra to recite ad infinitum, that's a fine
one, but
right now we're looking for ideas that are helpful and productive
On 05/31/2012 12:18 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Basil Mohamed Gohar (basilgo...@librevideo.org) said:
Remove Microsoft's keys, problem solved.
Ah, yes, but then you also won't be able to run Fedora, under the
currently proposed solution. Oops! See how slick the slope is?
If you're dumb
On 05/31/2012 12:53 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:49:53PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
The issue could be solved by having the SecureBoot default setting depend
on the OS being booted:
SecureBoot should only be Default:ON for
On 05/31/2012 10:26 PM, Arun SAG wrote:
I have been reading about secure boot. I understand that we are going
to pay Microsoft to get our keys signed. Will this change affect
people creating remixes? What about kernel modules from third party
repositories like rpmfusion? Will it be affected?
35 matches
Mail list logo
