Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

This is still causing me headaches. GPG2 switched away from the secring.gpg file, and now I have multiple tools using different files for storing my credentials. And, depending on which command I use (sometimes I slip and use gpg instead of gpg2), I import stuff to the wrong keyring, and I

Re: Did something change with ssh-agent in F24?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:24 AM Jakub Jelen <jje...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/20/2016 12:44 AM, Christopher wrote: > > Previously in F23, an ssh-agent was running when I started a gnome > > session. I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that this was being provided > &

Did something change with ssh-agent in F24?

Previously in F23, an ssh-agent was running when I started a gnome session. I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that this was being provided by gnome-keyring-daemon. Now, it appears that one isn't running. When I type "ssh-add -L", I get the message: "Could not open a connection to your

Re: wiki editing changes

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, 15:47 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In order to prevent these spam wiki edits entirely, we have changed the > wiki to require a user to have both signed the FPCA and be in at least > one additional group (CLA+1). This may require some workflow changes > for a few

Re: Looking for a proven packager

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:35 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream > > will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in

fedora-packager installs yum

Installing fedora-packager pulls in yum as a dependency. Is this expected on a system built around dnf and without yum already installed? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Unsorted comps

So, I'm trying to follow the retire instructions to retire nc6 and update comps, and I noticed a discrepancy between the instructions for updating the comps, and the actual state of the comps files. Running the xsltproc command at

Re: (retire nc6) never retired a package before

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:02 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way > > through it for nc6. > > > > Background: > > > > * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it > hasn't > > been

(retire nc6) never retired a package before

Hi all, I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way through it for nc6. Background: * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it hasn't been removed from comps entirely) * nc6 should also be obsoleted by nmap-ncat with nc, but it never was.

Re: Netcat

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:20 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 16 June 2016 at 14:23, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazq...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ch

Re: i686 failures

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:40 PM Mat Booth <fed...@matbooth.co.uk> wrote: > On 16 June 2016 at 20:16, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on >> i686 in koji that I cannot reproduc

i686 failures

I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop isn't really suitable for 32-bit architectures (IMO) and I doubt it's a

Netcat

So, I'm trying to understand what's going on with netcat. If anybody can enlighten me, I'd appreciate it. Here's what I've found so far: It looks like rpms/nc was retired due to being orphaned for too long. It looks like the same thing (almost) happened to rpms/nc6. I think netcat is too

Re: Hadoop?

> Il 03/06/2016 04:25, Christopher ha scritto: > hi > open a rel-eng ticket > e.g. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6220 > regards > .g I've opened https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6428 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproje

Re: Hadoop?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:33 PM Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:38 AM gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > >> >> >> Il 03/06/2016 13:20, Christopher ha scritto: >> > I also tried to unretire in pkgdb, but it res

Re: Hadoop?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:38 AM gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > > > Il 03/06/2016 13:20, Christopher ha scritto: > > I also tried to unretire in pkgdb, but it resulted in an error. > have you open a rel-eng ticket as suggested before? > regards > .g >

Re: Hadoop?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:35 AM Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:25:19AM +, Christopher wrote: > > > Ugh. Wish I had noticed. Is there a quick way to get it unretired? It's > > still an essential dependency of some packages which are

Re: Hadoop?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:33 PM gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > > > Il 02/06/2016 23:20, Chris Murphy ha scritto: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > >> So, it would seem at some point, wi

Re: Hadoop?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault, > > for not paying attentio

Hadoop?

So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault, for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or retired? in Fedora. This is a big problem for me, because the main package I work on is dependent upon Hadoop. What's the state of Hadoop in Fedora

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:44 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:37:26PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:30:14 + > > Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:56 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:51:27 + > Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > I recently updated my FAS account email forwarding address. > > > > Then, I got a

Bugzilla email address sync

I recently updated my FAS account email forwarding address. Then, I got an email with the title "Please fix your bugzilla.redhat.com account" This email was notifying me that my bugzilla.redhat.com account email address did not match my FAS forwarding address. I'd really rather not broadcast my

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:58 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 27.05.16 08:09, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: > > > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: NSS enforces the system-wide crypto policy

he impact in what sense? Note that openjdk will also conform to the > system wide policy. > > regards, > Nikos > > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 15:24 +, Christopher wrote: > > What is the impact on openjdk crypto providers? > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016, 05:49 Jan Kurik <

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: NSS enforces the system-wide crypto policy

What is the impact on openjdk crypto providers? On Fri, May 20, 2016, 05:49 Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: NSS enforces the system-wide crypto > policy = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSCryptoPolicies > > Change owner(s): > * Nikos

Re: Unretire surf

Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Status of XRDP in F23+

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:26 PM Timotheus Pokorra < timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com> wrote: > Hello Christopher, > > please check [1] if your bug has been reported already. > Or report new bugs at [2], and hopefully the maintainers (see list at > [3]) should reply on th

Status of XRDP in F23+

Hi, I sent a message to the users@ list[1] about XRDP, and didn't get a response. I'm curious what's the status of XRDP in Fedora. I tried to get it to work in the AWS cloud image for Fedora 23, and it didn't work (could authenticate, but it couldn't start vnc/gnome, but couldn't figure out why).

Re: Koschei false positives?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > Good idea! Can you open a ticket on the koschei issue tracker about it? > https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues Done, and thanks: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/73 -- devel mailing list

Koschei false positives?

I occasionally get notifications from Koschei about my packages failing to build. When I look ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13071213), I see a python stack trace which looks like it has nothing to do with my package's build. Rather, it looks like Koschei itself failed.

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:04 AM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. > *​https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_for_EPEL > *​https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging >

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:09 PM John M. Harris, Jr. wrote: > Unless there are any issues with gpg, and to my knowledge there aren't, I > can't see any important reason to default 'gpg' to 'gpg2', at least not for > f24. > > The biggest reason I can think is to make things

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:18 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:29:10AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:29:26 -0800 > > "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > > > > > I am opposed to this. If a tool wants/needs to > > > use v2 it should

GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309175 It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and for other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the mismatch between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:38 PM Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > I've been thinking about Gnome keyring a lot lately, and I have concerns > about security, and I don't know if this is a Gnome keyring problem, or a > problem affecting Fedora specifically. > >

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:06 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:43:09 + > Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > > ...snip... > > > I can't be the only one interested in finding out how to secure these > >

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:37 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 18:43 +, Christopher wrote: > > I can't be the only one interested in finding out how to secure these > > things in Fedora. > > Any application running as your

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:03 PM Sander Hoentjen <san...@hoentjen.eu> wrote: > On 01/21/2016 12:29 AM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen <san...@hoentjen.eu > > <mailto:san...@hoentjen.eu>> wrote: > > [snip] >

Gnome keyring security in Fedora

integration with Gnome/Seahorse/GPG. Thoughts? -- Christopher -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen wrote: [snip] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript > Yeah I read that, but is says "Please note that this section really only > applies to JavaScript libraries intended for use on the web." so I am > not sure

Re: is there a reason for starting zookeeper.service in background?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 11.01.16 18:30, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > quoted from systemd.serivce manual page > > > > >> it is recommended to also use the PIDFile= option, so that systemd can > > identify the

Re: Easier %config management?

That blog seems to describe supporting a stateless use case, not for advocating that all systems should be stateless. In any case, the factory reset use case they describe is similar to some of my own. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, 23:32 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015

Re: Dead entries in pkgdb?

-beamer > tetex-pgf > tetex-xcolor Hi, 2 years ago I packaged reposurgeon, and wrongly submitted the SCM request in Bugzilla as name repsurgeon. Jon retired it quickly after I told him about the mistake. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel ma

Re: Easier %config management?

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:37 AM J. Randall Owens < jrowens.fed...@ghiapet.net> wrote: > On 12/14/2015 02:47 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > > <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: > > &

Re: Easier %config management?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:50 PM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 13.12.2015 um 05:58 schrieb Christopher: > > rpm could track more than hashes of config files, and instead track the > > full file. This could be optional, as it uses more disk space, but

Re: Easier %config management?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 13.12.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: > > For the few cases that can't or won't comply, then having rpm > > (optionally?) make the originals available would be fantastic for > > system management > >

Re: Easier %config management?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 14.12.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Christopher: > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net > > For me, I'd want the up-to-date one from the current version

Easier %config management?

Which components/packages are best candidates for adding a feature which would make it easier for users to track changes from the default %config %files on the system? I've found this to be a deficiency, requiring users to do configuration management independently of the installer tools on a

Devel archives site is awesome, but...

The devel mailing list archives has an awesome interface, but unfortunately, it only seems to work with the devel@ list, not any of the others (like java-devel@). Any plans to extend that functionality to improve all the mailing list archives? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Let's Encrypt for F23?

I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet see a 'letsencrypt' package. Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available soon might be very useful for F23 users. Does anybody have any plans

LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

What's the deal with libreoffice packages being a dependency for so many system library packages? I try to `sudo dnf remove libreoffice\*` and it grabs a bunch of surprising packages with it, including some fonts and system libraries. Granted, I don't think I need any of these things, so it's

Upstream DNF?

Where is the upstream DNF issue tracker? I see the project on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf However, there doesn't appear to be a corresponding issue tracker, or point of contact to request access to edit Wiki pages (which are locked down), etc. In fact, there appears to

Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you >> have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your >> package, or follow

Re: Ivy packaging for EPEL7

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm > trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems. > > I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, whi

Ivy packaging for EPEL7

What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems. I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, which comes with xmvn 2, but it looks like EL7/EPEL7 is mostly a F19-era package set. Are there any plans to

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:06:51AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015, 14:29 Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from &

Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that was expected? It certainly surprised me. In addition to the mediatomb configuration needing to be changed, I also

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015, 12:28 Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from em1 to eno1. Is this something that was expected? It certainly surpri

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-11-02)

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:48 AM wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

ed header files and > compiler, so depending on devel package is superfluos overshot wasting > resources. Yes, and to avoid faddish name like nodejs-packaging. It's better to create a central repository for macros, and then decide where to put them. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

it should be acceptable: --- ghc-srpm-macros gnat-srpm-macros go-srpm-macros ocaml-srpm-macros perl-srpm-macros --- Cheers. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Bug dnf update

really a bug > in dnf. Try again later or specify a different mirror. And I believe users list is better for threads like this, no offense. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 04:46 Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org> wrote: > On https <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694>:// <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

I'm afraid of some runtime dependencies clash, small amount of rebuilds to all (r-)deps? -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http

Bodhi updates not pushed?

On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in the f23 repo. Did I do something wrong? Where can I go to check or fix the problem?

Re: fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM Ralph Bean wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We are planning a re-work/re-write of the application entirely, but > > it's not happened yet. ;( > > Small correction, we started on it at the end of last week!

fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

Has anybody else noticed that the fedora-packages bug listing (linked from pkgdb) seems out of sync with bugzilla? For example, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/zookeeper/bugs shows bugs which have been closed as being still open, and the counts are incorrect. Is this a known issue? --

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > >> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror >> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

* Versions lower than 2.8 had been dropped from supported lifecycle for a long time. * Backporting fixes to 2.4 doesn't make too much sense. * Config change is needed (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/2.6/00-RELEASENOTES). -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows it's there. It'd be nice if this were supported directly, perhaps by automatically mirroring all packages in GitHub, like the ASF does, and emailing maintainers when

[EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

Hi, Redis in EPEL6 is pretty dated, I'd like to update it to the latest 2.x version but somehow I haven't done major update like this. Is it allowed to update the package from 2.4 to 2.8 for new RHEL 6.x like 6.8 release? Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

I couldn't see any words from RPMFusion guys so far about this. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Looking for co-maintainers: zookeeper, bookkeeper, curator

I'm currently a co-maintainer on ZooKeeper. I know there's some bugs that I've overlooked these last few months. I intend to try to address some of them this week, but having another, esp. an upstream maintainer involved, would be nice. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés

Re: Setting + for fedora-review?

lopment team > do this or am I missing something here? You should check your account in FAS to confirm you'd already in packager group. (I guess so, right?) -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: Proposal: retire lesstif in f24 and beyond

IMO motif should 'Obsoletes' lesstif in Fedora since motif is free now. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code

Re: dnf: Error: RPM package source (jpilot-1.8.2-2.fc22.src) will not installed

rg >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> > > I want build claws-mail to support jpilot. Fedora package claws-mail does support jpilot. You don't need to build claws-mail again.

Erlang R18.1 on F23 or too late?

Hi, Is there any possibility to have Erlang 18.1 on F23? Thanks. [1]---http://www.erlang.org/news/92 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http

Re: python: dropping the .py files [was Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything)] bloat

amount of packages sounds tedious to me. For example define a new kind of file as %cache in %files, and process them like find-lang, then let users decide whether files marked as %cache will be installed in default or not. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing l

Re: dnf upgrade won't upgrade, but yum-deprecated does!!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265336 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try to dive in and figure out what's breaking, does anybody have any insight into what's going on with this, and

Re: F23 broke dependencies

> licq-1.8.2-9.fc23.armv7hl requires libboost_regex.so.1.57.0 What‘s wrong with boost regex on f23 ARM? -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Cond

Re: Help with a font package

Personally hate Google's way on open source, especially distribution. This font is intended to be used in Google Keep, however it's not included in roboto family. Here is the link to the source: https://github.com/google/fonts/tree/master/apache/robotoslab -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng

Re: package naming question: IT++

In line with tarball name, it's better to use itpp. No +1 for libitpp if itpp had been there for several years. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-09-21)

I released ownership of flickcurl, because I don't use it anymore. I still hold epel branches, if someone wants to step in, welcome. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

-- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: rpmbuild - empty RPMS directory

like forum. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaning two packages

I'd be happy to take bonesi. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Orphaning packages (i)

Hi folks, I decide to orphan some packages I won't use anymore, here is the first part. --- flickcurl (EPEL branches preserved, if anyone want to take, let me know) python-couchdbkit python-foolscap python-zbase32 libtsm redet sitecopy surf --- Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

oducing more and more packages instead of solving the problem. Initially copying the idea from Debian, introducing libfoo2, libbar3, or whatever is silly as well. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Wouldn't the provides line needs a full path, otherwise, it could conflict? I'm generally against this proposal. One of the reasons I like using a distribution like Fedora is for dependency convergence. And I prefer exceptions to be rare and carefully deliberated. That said, where I think this

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

Should be time to drop istanbul, since it's no longer developed. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

hiredis 0.13.2 planned soon in rawhide

Hi folks, Hiredis is going to be updated in rawhide ONLY with soname version bumped from 0.12 to 0.13. Following packages need to be rebuilt: collectd yaz opensips openvas rsyslog syslog-ng zmap Cheers. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

ovaldi maintainer here. Will update it as soon as possible. Last time when I tried the update, it's incompatible with rpm 4.12+... -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Review swap] ps2emu-tools

xchange for mine, please let me know. Swapped with abcmidi[1]. [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Co

Re: bodhi2: ACL validation mechanism was unable to determine ACLs

I met this as well when I edited updates. Then I manually typed the build in the field and pressed enter instead of selecting them with checkbox pulled after entering the package name. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bodhi 2 now live

, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: bodhi 2 now live

. Occupying the moral high ground doesn't help as well. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >