-party repo for Fedora users.
Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, john.tiger john.tigernas...@gmail.com
wrote:
I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd
everything. In my normal workstation environment, I typically only
run yum manually from the command-line and don't need these.
I have not yet tried dnf at all.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 01:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
To me, it is obvious that the Workstation WG is in deliberate contempt of
FESCo's decision. That alone ought to lead to sanctions from FESCo. In
addition,
I can help as several months ago the budgie music player was packaged by
myself. At that time the desktop was however unstable.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
I just verified that I have the same default configuration from a clean
install. Not good at all. I expected more.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Hi,
I just happened to look at the firewalld
. Basically, the name or release
type (not LTS, but whatever label is appropriate), could be a semantic
hook for packages to follow or not.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure
how to even begin tracking it down. ...
File a bugzilla report, and attach each file in /var/log/anaconda
as a separate text/plain attachment.
the same problem if I delete all the existing partitions on
the drive and install only Fedora. That proceeds fine. The problem only
seems to exist if I try to install alongside Windows.
My question is: how might I go about troubleshooting this?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com
willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure
how to even begin tracking it down. I had thought it may have something to
do with the extra recovery partitions, but the partitioning screen in
Anaconda seemed to detect the existing partitions just fine.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad
mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac rcyr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Lars Seipel wrote:
What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship
applications to carry ads and report
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac rcyr...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
Hi,
Please try again with make directly instead of make %{?_smp_mflags}.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/F21_Alpha/Installation
What's this?
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Incompatible though.
But without v2, some packages will not work. V2 should be pushed
already, but V1 is still used in f20.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WebService-Linode:
55cf4d34782b59bb3b962efc835284c0 WebService-Linode-0.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2b9c7b27528dc85dd5df747e06d5b7d2f459d4b0
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Sat Oct 18 01:45:30 2014 -0400
Update to 0.23
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WebService-Linode.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions
Summary of changes:
1519cd4... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
2b9c7b2... Update to 0.23
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1519cd4... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
2b9c7b2... Update to 0.23 (*)
50a003e... Merge branch 'master' into f20
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
commit 50a003e4a9537500b2457a7b94fb10dbb81a5e9c
Merge: ea265f3 2b9c7b2
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Sat Oct 18 01:45:46 2014 -0400
Merge branch 'master' into f20
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WebService-Linode.spec |8 +++-
sources
Summary of changes:
1519cd4... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
2b9c7b2... Update to 0.23 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2b9c7b2... Update to 0.23 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
. net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
It'd be a dilemma, upstream didn't do that, while downstream can do
that and then the commit will be objected by the others.
See the example of json-c[1].
[1]---https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-July/201320.html
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel
I think this is only a self introduction of your email address...But
not yourself...
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I have orphaned skytux'es packages:
jwm -- Joe's Window Manager ( master f21 f20 f19 )
jwm taken.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
over this package if you don't want.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
, I like the proposal, but I think it could be made simpler on new
packagers (and reviewers) with better tooling (which I suppose could be
considered out of scope for this proposal, but something to consider in
future).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
You can report a bug against noip:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedoraversion=rawhidecomponent=noip
IMO noip should switch to systemd. I've written one and if noip Fedora
maintainer won't maintain it in EPEL, I could offer a hand.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:55 PM, LOEFFLER Peter
peter.loeff...@herold.at wrote:
I think it's a good idea to switch to systemd.
Did i get it right that i shoud report a bug that a systemd script is missing
and you will offer it at bugzilla?
You can report a bug first, I will arrive there
I also hope mesa packager could use a shorter 8-digit git rev here
instead of using the current one.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
=1128395
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Good to hear.
Thanks!
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On Aug 27, 2014 9:23 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
That has a sub-build[1] that is failing but for a different reason:
Error: Package: harfbuzz-icu-0.9.35-2.fc22.x86_64 (build)
Requires: libicuuc.so.52()(64bit)
Might be fallout from the gcc mass rebuild.
Not that case.
commit 48ec143afddfaa4d737718e99a22b5191b5843ac
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Thu Aug 28 08:11:06 2014 +0800
Modernization.
perl-Async-MergePoint.spec |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Async-MergePoint.spec b/perl-Async
Hi,
Can someone tell me the status of the mono 3.4 proposal? I contacted chkr
last year and he said it's a big task. He didn't say anything about the
feature although the mono package is obsolete already. And I don't know why
3.4 was proposed by a stranger this year again(someone is not even a
when the condition fails (=20), but that's more to maintain
in the specfile, and it'd be much simpler to just not declare any
subpackaging for javadocs.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello
On Aug 21, 2014 2:09 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
please be aware that updating the mono packages is only first step, the
maintainer should put reasonable effort into ensuring the rest of the
mono stack also builds after such major rebase
That's what I'm concerned about.
--
devel
hope you can step in with a detailed plan/schedule. You
were too hasty IMO.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263
Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving
updates? Or only F21 and later?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Hi,
I've met an issue since last year, as many python2 packages generate
.so files finally with 775 set:
non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xxx.so 0775L
Is it suppose to be the default?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
in the SPEC.
I'm curious about /usr/bin/ld: RPATH=/usr/lib64.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
There are packages still notready for EPEL7 at least.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
HI folks,
Since 2011 he hasn't done any build of his packages, and one of his
package abcm2ps has been out of date for years:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063102
I think it's time to drop his ownership.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel
On Aug 7, 2014 6:16 PM, Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com
wrote:
As I say below, I orphaned the F21, F20, F19 branches on pkgdb. Then I
checked out the F21 branch with fedpkg and tried to run the command below.
Have I misunderstood your question?
Please also retire the master
When is it possible to let updates pushed by robots?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I've packaged it for almost a year.
I will leave some comments there on Monday. Issues found.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
on Qt3
whereas the latest version has ported it to Qt4), as a result I'd like
to take it over and fix it.
Thanks.
[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998969
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Jul 31, 2014 7:44 PM, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Dear Fedora Team,
I pray to God. Could Fedora live have CD/DVD/USB Gparted by default?
Could add Gparted please?
You should provide us a reasonable explanation as the essential
precondition for the request.
--
devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WebService-Linode:
a161a492ae4b029b3a1f45a3c67e0649 WebService-Linode-0.22.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
99b8752... Update to 0.22 (*)
ea265f3... Merge branch 'master' into f20
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit ea265f3313fe5977a8454b44add2e95a84e77a52
Merge: 345cda0 99b8752
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Thu Jul 31 08:52:39 2014 +0800
Merge branch 'master' into f20
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WebService-Linode.spec |5 -
sources
Summary of changes:
99b8752... Update to 0.22 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 99b87523c8900f9ccb6e4aef233f4878cce63990
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Thu Jul 31 08:52:25 2014 +0800
Update to 0.22
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WebService-Linode.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions
Summary of changes:
99b8752... Update to 0.22 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
+ branches. I've unpushed the update of
json-c on elder branches.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi all,
Thanks for your comment. Those 2 updates was already canceled
yesterday as I've realized the problem after Sandro's bug report.
TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump,
deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11.
It's tricky now.
1. Upstream
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pipelight-selinux.git/tree/pipelight-selinux.spec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Have you asked the Fedora maintainer of those 21 packages?
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Actually the epel7 Request page should only be edited by the existing
packagers, or someone may get annoyed.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Zhiwei Zhu z_...@wargaming.net wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I have removed the part added by me. Sorry for the mistake.
Well no problem, you are new to here ;)
We need to focus on these packages now as they are required by people.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
And now APLpy is broken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
This list is not the right place to discuss these stuffs.
If you want to let them land in the EPEL7, please fill bugs in Bugzilla
against the relevant component. I'm sure most of the owners of those
packages may not subscribe to this list.
___
Welcome.
If you have interests, join chinese@lists and have some talks with us.
Have a nice day.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
in some cases connecting to the
fedoraproject.org is not fast as imagined, accordingly it even took me
1.5 min to switch the branch just now.
But in the past I don't have any problem here.
So is it the philosophy of new fedpkg?
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Xslate:
ee0b8410b33d42d285f41c9de747ae67 Text-Xslate-3.2.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2dce8f2... Update to 3.2.5 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2dce8f2... Update to 3.2.5 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2dce8f2705794010c50eafbd58856203288ab6bc
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Thu Jul 17 09:20:54 2014 +0800
Update to 3.2.5
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Text-Xslate.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions
this rpm to repo line. thanks,
Have you checked?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543666
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Deps are satisfied already based on the successful build of the thunar.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669
Thanks for the report.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
makes the
broken xfdesktop in the EPEL7, so he will fix it soon.
There are some xfce guys in this list, you can await their answers.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:
I strongly suggest that please also update this package to the latest
version 4.39 instead of using 4.38.
What is the advantage of 4.39? It is not in rawhide yet though...
Version 4.39:
- Added ballot, checkmark, heavy
Hi all,
I strongly suggest that please also update this package to the latest
version 4.39 instead of using 4.38.
Thanks.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Michal Sekletar msekl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:55:42PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
snip
netatalk orphan, fkocina
I'd like take this one.
I will approve later when I finish the cleanup(in progress), then you
can do
You'd better open a bug in the bugzilla under Fedora EPEL against the
relevant component if it is available in the EPEL6.
If not, open a bug under Fedora and request the epel7 branch.
Thanks.
___
epel-devel mailing list
Can someone package statusnotifier into Fedora? I want to test it.
Or Kevin, any plans on the packaging?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
(os.getcwd())
Ouch ... can we ban this guy from Fedora?
Why it's considered as simple? I couldn't find it behind.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
Put this in the bookmarks:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
IMO q(pkgdb: q) lang should be obsoleted by the pure(pkgdb: pure) lang
pointed out by upstream many years ago.
For those compat-gcc* packages, shouldn't they be retired?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jason Taylor jason.tay...@secure-24.com wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I grabbed the zsh-lovers for a formal review.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
Thank
kannel failed to BFS because texlive does have a bug (dependency) problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995752
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
I'd like to take these 3:
bitbakeixs
guile-lib laxathom
rats smilner, rmonk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 05:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This is not an official solution, but I am now providing a COPR for
Rawhide installs that provides a compatibility library for libgcrypt.
That's awesome, but can we get
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone here interested in maintaining a libgcrypt compat package for F21
lifetime? I'd be happy to help sort out packaging and get this through
the review process.
Have you got any response from Google actually?
--
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
You must be confusing me with someone else. I am not a libgcrypt
maintainer and haven't talked to Google about this.
No.
It's a burden for downstream to ship such a compat- package for chrome
only, and chrome is not a
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:35:26AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
It's a burden for downstream to ship such a compat- package for chrome
only, and chrome is not a part of Fedora.
Maintaining software in general
Hi,
I have a python module for review swap, hope someone can do me a favour,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
Thanks.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
I've taken it up. Can you please review vit in return? It's a really
quick review too :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112072
No problem.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version
Yes, it's fine.
If you want to avoid such bump you shouldn't use %tag, just fill in
the number. I couldn't see the reason of using this one-off macro.
Release: %{tag}.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}
to
Release: 8.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
/show_bug.cgi?id=1115122
3. vinterm - Vintage-style terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098950
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/tree/libkolabxml.spec#n305
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
How many patches needed for the latest mule?
Are these[1] merged already?
[1]---http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mule.git/tree/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over
other's packages.
If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of
packages, that will be helpful.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
He is or was a Red Hat employee.
No.
Please use this email address:
vanmeeuwen.kolabsys@com (@ - .)
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
juan.o...@miceliux.com wrote:
El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió:
Thank you.
It's better to nofity him about his archaic email address IMO, as he
uses his working address in the %changelog[1] but not in the whole
I'm also investigating the results, as I also couldn't see what's wrong there.
I fixed this package days ago and it at least could be built(it uses
jam to build which is totally a mess to me).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
601 - 700 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
