Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

Hi there, On 2023-03-19 08:14, Sandro wrote: Dominik, since you picked up the RPMFusion package, which conflicts with the new Fedora package, could you bring me up to speed what needs (is planned to) happen with the RPMFusion package The Fedora packaged libheif came through as a stable update

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210909.n.0 changes

Hi there, On 2021-09-09 10:07 a.m., Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:10:45PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210908.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = Package:

Call for testing: nginx 1.20.0 with permission changes on logs

Dear Fedorans, Nginx 1.20.0 stable was just released and I took the opportunity to squash some long standing open bugs while updating the package. The new release is on it's way to updates-testing right now. I would like to encourage some extra testing for this release as there is one

[EPEL-devel] Intent to update nginx to 1.20.0

Hi there, I think this has been discussed at committee meetings before: nginx's procedure of immediately dropping a release series when a new one hits the stable branches is essentially forcing us to upgrade along with it, unless someone is willing to backport patches. I personally am not

How to handle nginx 3rd party modules?

Fedorans, I am the maintainer of the nginx package in Fedora and EPEL. Currently I have two bug reports [1][2] open against nginx that ask for the inclusion of 3rd party extensions into the nginx main package. Unlike the Apache httpd, the nginx codebase does not allow modules to be

Unresponsive Maintainer: bpereto

Hi fellow Fedorans, I'm trying to contact Benjamin Pereto (FAS: bpereto), maintainer of borgbackup and borgmatic. https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/bpereto https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/borgmatic I have started the non-responsive maintainer process as borgmatic has not seen an

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

On 2019-07-22 2:51 p.m., Ben Cotton wrote: After preliminary discussions with CPU vendors, we propose AVX2 as the new baseline. AVX2 support was introduced into CPUs from 2013 to 2015. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#CPUs_with_AVX2 CPUs with AVX2]. Here's a

Orphaning php-ZendFramework

Hi fellow Fedorians, I have been intending to orphan php-ZendFramework version 1 for over a year now. It is End-of-Life, unmaintained (no updates in over 2 years), has known security issues and probably doesn't fully work with PHP 7.2 and up anymore anyway. Plus, I no longer use it and

Orphaning vdr-streamdev

Hi, I'm orphaning vdr-streamdev since I no longer use it. There shouldn't be any open issues with this one. Also, this was the package that initially got me sponsored :) Regards, Felix ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Orphaning dansguardian

Hi there, I'm orphaning dansguardian. Upstream has been largely dormant and I haven't been using it for several years. The package has some co-maintainers who also haven't been very active. Feel free to pick-up the package, but bear in mind it needs some fixing. Regards, Felix

Re: AppData questions

Richard Hughes wrote: It's not mandatory, but highly reccomended. See http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/#screenshots for details. A little off-topic but I was wondering: The spec states Screenshots should be taken with US English as the display language.. However the spec also

Re: [F18][ATI Rage XL] Problems with install on ATI Rage XP video driver

Adam Williamson wrote: And please do realize your graphics adapter is well over a decade old. ATI stopped posting official Windows drivers for it in 2002: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/legacy-xp.aspx . Quoting from Wikipedia: It was also seen on Intel motherboards, as recently

Orphaning em8300 related stuff

Hi there, I'm orphaning em8300 in Fedora and em8300-kmod in RPMFusion because I no longer own the hardware to use it. Also, it has seen little love from upstream. Feel free to take it. Regards, Felix -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: non-responsive icon theme maintainer

Am 13.10.2011 22:26, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: I have orphaned all their packages. Please feel free to take the ones you wish. faenza-icon-theme I've taken this. Felix -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE environment on another machine

Am 11.10.2011 15:20, schrieb Aaron Gray: Thanks, still needs TFTP but this could simplify things a lot. If you want to circumvent using TFTP and you are using gPXE (or a PXE boot ROM that supports booting from HTTP) you could point it to the pxelinux of boot.fedoraproject.org at

Orphaning rubyripper

Hi there! I'm orphaning rubyripper. I don't use it anymore and it has some bug that I'm not able to fix [1]. I've updated it to the 0.6.0 release just now, for the convenience of anyone who might want to take it ;) Felix [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595812 -- devel

Retiring nforenum

Hi there, as soon as grfcodec-1.0.1-0.1.r772 is in stable for all branches I will retire nforenum. nforenum has recently been included in the grfcodec codebase, so there's no need to keep nforenum as a seperate package. This will probably affect nobody directly (unless you develop graphics for

Re: Asterisk 1.8 in Rawhide (F-15)

Hi Jeff! I'll start testing Asterisk 1.8 on my home server soon. Thanks for the work updating the packages. Furthermore I'd be interested in comaintaining the Asterisk stack, especially also the DAHDI package, as I plan to submit the DAHDI kmods to RPMFusion and it would be easier for me to keep

Many webapps in Fedora require httpd instead of webserver

Hi there, I had a short glimpse at the review request for dojo (#609817) today and saw that it explicitly requires httpd. Well, dojo is a collection of static JavaScript files so I feel that there is no reason why it should require httpd explicitly as I don't see what special features of Apache

Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?

I get the feeling that no one on this thread has looked into https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/403 So this has already been handled by FESCo, mistakes have been made and most likely will be avoided in the future. Felix -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: rt2500usb bug and kernel 2.6.34 on fc13

Am 29.06.2010 18:50, schrieb Jean-Luc Fontaine: I have the following problem on fc13: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15699 which should be fixed on the latest kernel 2.6.34, but I cannot find an rpm (/x86_64/) anywhere (for fc13 or fc14). Any ideas? Thanks! Have a look at

Re: A question about locale files

Hi Robin, I'm sure a peek into http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files will definitely help you. HTH, Felix Am 26.04.2010 17:46, schrieb Robin 'cheese' Lee: Hello! I am now dealing with a package named 'gentoo'. It installs following locale files:

Re: Query about usb_modeswitch and how to handle its packaging

Am 20.04.2010 09:55, schrieb Huzaifa Sidhpurwala: 2. Have two srpms one for data and one for binary, with both depending on each other. This is the way to go. It also makes it easier for you to maintain it in the future. However, you must create a new review request for the data package

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

Hi Michael, On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote: Why would it need to be rebuilt manually? You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update is available there's no need to rebuild. Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you should

Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is thomasvs. Felix -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org