Hi,
On 22-07-19 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_
Hi All,
The work I've been doing to improve support for Logitech wireless keyboards:
https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/21731.html
Has branched out a bit and now I've also been looking into improving support
for keyboards with builtin LCD panels. So now I would like to add support for
the LCD f
Hi,
On 30-05-19 20:18, Adam Jackson wrote:
Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
of these are incompletely retired or there's
Hi,
On 27-05-19 14:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Hans de Goede:
Interesting idea, my first thoughts on this are that doing this
during installation time feels wrong. How are you going to figure
out for which languages to generate the locale data ? The language
can differ per user. e.g. on my
Hi,
On 27-05-19 11:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the
glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation,
based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what
Debian does.
The reason is that the com
Hi All,
I recently bought a 2nd hand MX5000 keyboard, which has a builtin LCD
panel. So now I would like to add MX5000 support to the Fedora lcdproc
packages.
This requires libmx5000 which is part of mx5000-tools, so I've packaged\
this up, review request here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Hi All,
I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
anaconda-core which seems weird.
So should I file a bug against anacon
g for this.
Regards,
Hans
Thanks.
On 4/2/19 5:05 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is running but not responding"
Hi,
On 02-04-19 18:53, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is runni
Hi All,
To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is running but not responding". I believe this is caused
by thunderbird spawning /usr/bin/firefox to open the link instead of
Hi,
On 3/13/19 9:45 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Hans de Goede [13/03/2019 08:51] :
A solution for this needs to be found and be in place *before* dropping
these packages not the otherway around.
We've known the solution for months, now.
If you (this is the generic you, no
Hi,
On 12-03-19 11:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_
Hi,
On 07-03-19 11:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Actually it's more subtle. It didn't remove the files, but it did
break something really fundamental, perhaps execv? Perhaps new
binaries cannot link with the slightly older glibc?
$ echo /usr/bin/ls
/usr/bin/ls
$ /usr/bin/ls
-bash: /usr/bin/l
Hi,
On 15-02-19 12:51, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:11 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
I will take sdljava as bolzplatz relies on it.
I do not know how / why this was orphaned. This package has
2 other admin's in the user/group settings. If this was done
automatically it
Hi,
On 08-02-19 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just wanted to update everyone on our current status.
As you know from the other thread:
* The mass rebuild happened and finished.
* The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag
(to make sure everything was signed).
* In the middle of
Hi,
On 03-01-19 20:50, John Harris wrote:
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:46:47 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot
This doesn't seem to be inclusive of any other desktop environment than GNOME.
There is no reason why the new plymouth theme and
Hi,
On 20-12-18 18:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 12/20/18 2:35 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 11:29, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 10:16, Hans de Goede wrote:
So I say +100 to just pushing the changes directly, as said
people
Hi,
On 20-12-18 10:54, Raphael Groner wrote:
So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete stuff?
I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
My vote would go for Pull Requests to give the packagers a (limited) chance to
look into the proposal individuall
Hi,
On 17-11-18 12:18, Antonio Trande wrote:
Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
On 15/11/18 13:22, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hello!
Please, take a look to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
Hi,
On 19-09-18 02:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 18:57 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 9/18/18 3:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
But is this bugginess worth a FE to try and get -58 onto the Beta?
Lots of users will install
Hi,
On 18-09-18 17:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:36:32AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:56 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 18-09-18 01:12, Chris Murphy wrote:
I've got a F
Hi,
On 18-09-18 01:12, Chris Murphy wrote:
I've got a Fedora 29 Silverblue installation in a VM. First boot I see
the GRUB menu, and after that it's hidden. And I can't figure out how
to unhide it. Boot is failing before I get multiuser login or ssh, so
extracting information to troubleshoot/bug
Hi,
On 14-09-18 20:03, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their
Hi,
On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to
be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll d
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to
be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r later
and update you guys.
On Mon 10 Sep, 2018, 6:08 PM Richard Shaw, mailto:hobbes1...@gmai
Hi,
On 02-09-18 09:33, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 15:50 skrev stan :
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 13:44:56 +0200
Andreas Tunek wrote:
I can't get a commandline, everything seems stuck in the boot
process Is there anyway to get a commandline and update the system
when it is in thi
Hi All,
Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the
dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service
file, breaking almost everything.
Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the
dbus.socket file expects a matching dbus.service, not
dbus-daemon.service.
So e
Hi,
On 01-08-18 17:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 20:29 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 60/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180730.n.0):
So the big change here is a
Hi All,
This is a heads up about a bug which I hit Sunday, if you're
seeing any weird crashes with recently build packages then
this may very well be the cause.
I've filed a ticket with rel-eng to get affected packages
automatically rebuild:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7670
Here is the text
Hi,
On 19-07-18 17:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain
and that is just for packages starting with the letter '
Hi,
On 19-07-18 17:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain
and that is just for packages starting with the letter '
Hi,
On 19-07-18 17:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:15:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain
and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'.
A quick check s
Hi All,
I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain
and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'.
A quick check shows that these are all caused by a missing
BuildRequires on gcc / g++ related to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_Buil
Hi,
On 15-07-18 09:25, Honza Horak wrote:
License of xfig package was changed
from: MIT
to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+
PR submitted, not yet merged:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3
Hans or Steve, please, merge.
The lib/.c files are not used when building on Linux, afte
Hi,
On 15-07-18 09:11, Honza Horak wrote:
License of transfig package was changed
from: MIT
to: MIT and GPLv3+
https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/transfig.git/commit/?id=fe80b4977bc3a9a3c47497a0042a2ca4a5001ba8
The fig2dev/lib/.c files are not used when building on Linux, after adding:
Hi,
On 29-06-18 17:46, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le 2018-05-31 14:25, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Originally I was planning on doing the failed-boot detect only
for F30, but I agree it makes sense to have it for F29 and this
will also give us some field testing of this while we still have
a fallback
Hi,
On 26-06-18 15:19, Radka Janekova wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>>wrote:
Hi,
On 25-06-18 13:26, Radka Janekova wrote:
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#Current_status
Hi,
On 25-06-18 13:26, Radka Janekova wrote:
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#Current_status
> "Enable USB autosuspend for USB bluetooth receivers by default. If all other USB
devices on the laptop also have USB auto-suspend enabled (which typically is tru
Hi,
On 20-06-18 18:33, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
This isn't related to a service, but is throwing out an spurious error message.
There is a patch but it hasn't made it's way
yet into the Fedora kernel:
rt_cmos registration error: rhbz#1568276
Basically an error is being thrown because your system
Hi,
On 10-06-18 19:02, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:07 AM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On 04-06-18 21:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 12:43 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Hi
Hi,
On 08-06-18 00:35, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:07 AM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
A question to you (and the Fedora community in general) where
should the documentation for this live ? I would like to have
something longer live
Hi,
On 04-06-18 21:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 12:43 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu
We (QA) would like to note that the "How to test" section of this
Change seems heavily un
Hi,
On 01-06-18 22:29, Peter Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jason L Tibbitts III said:
If we're going to patch grub to expand the set of keys it will watch
for, is it possible to just expand the set to encompass all keys? We
don't
Hi,
On 04-06-18 09:16, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Note I've dropped the fedora-devel list (-ETOOMUCHBIKESHED)
and added Javier and Jan to the Cc.
Ugh, so clearly I failed to remove fedora-devel from the CC.
Ah well. I hope this mistake shows that there is nothing
nefarious going on her
Hi,
Note I've dropped the fedora-devel list (-ETOOMUCHBIKESHED)
and added Javier and Jan to the Cc.
On 01-06-18 20:03, Peter Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:47:36PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 31-05-18 15:20, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:52 AM, Hans de Goede
Hi,
On 01-06-18 20:38, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Jun 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
First of all I want to thank everyone for their input.
I also want to make clear that the hide the menu +
not listening for a keypress at all (aka fastboot) is a
Fedora 30 thing, quoting
Hi,
On 01-06-18 15:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
For F30, single OS Fedora Workstation install install we get:
1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the menu
What I haven't seen answered is this: what do we really gain from this?
Hi,
On 01-06-18 11:54, Tomas Kovar wrote:
Hi all,
I have two suggestions:
- on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force grub
menu? That way, it would be possible to enter the menu from UEFI boot loader or
shell, even if the system itself is in non-working state or o
Hi All,
First of all I want to thank everyone for their input.
I also want to make clear that the hide the menu +
not listening for a keypress at all (aka fastboot) is a
Fedora 30 thing, quoting myself:
"For F29, single OS Fedora Workstation install we get:
1) grub menu hidden by default with
Hi,
On 31-05-18 15:20, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 05/31/2018 06:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
...
This will basically get us back the F28 behavior of showing the
menu but only after a failed boot, I think that is a good
solution, do you agree?
What is the definition of a successful boot? I ask
Hi,
On 31-05-18 16:40, stan wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2018 12:23:35 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
to the graphical login manager without him seeing any
text mes
Hi,
On 31-05-18 15:08, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018, at 6:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
to the graphical login manager without him seeing any
Hi,
On 31-05-18 15:08, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
And for F30, single OS install we get:
1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the menu
2) grub menu shown with 5 sec timeout after a failed boot
If I know I want the menu (say I need to boot
Hi,
On 31-05-18 13:59, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:53 AM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On 31-05-18 12:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:24 AM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 31-05-18 12:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:24 AM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
to th
Hi All,
I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
to the graphical login manager without him seeing any
text messages / menus filled with technical jargon.
IIRC we used to hide the grub-menu by default on single
OS i
disks? Also,
drive FW is upgradeable in Lenovo laptops.
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On 05/01/2018 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Dalrio wrote:
Hi,
i run fedora 28 on a t450 since it was promoted to beta working with it
Hi,
On 03-05-18 10:50, Lorenzo Dalrio wrote:
Hi,
here is the output:
# cat /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date
JBET68WW (1.32 )
02/27/2018
I apply BIOS updates quite regularly.
Thank you, may I also ask which desktop-environment you are
using (because of GPU usage by
then laptop/motherboard related
but in this case it seems that it is something motherboard related,
as several people are reporting this with very different disks and
1 reporter has even tried to swap the disk.
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redha
Hi,
On 05/02/2018 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 29/04/18 17:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 29-04-18 11:09, Christian Dersch wrote:
I managed to install F28 (fresh install of KDE spin) on the second disc
of my T450s. I cannot reproduce the issue by changing screen brightness
there
Hi,
On 05/01/2018 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Dalrio wrote:
Hi,
i run fedora 28 on a t450 since it was promoted to beta working with it
8-10 hours per day without any issue.
System Information
Manufacturer: LENOVO
Product Name: 20BUS003IX
Version: ThinkPad T450
# cat /sys/c
Hi,
On 29-04-18 21:03, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello Hans,
I've just upgraded a G50-30 and like Christian, I can not reproduce the
issue. I logged into MATE and GNOME, played with the brightness settings
while plugged in and on battery, it did not hang.
# cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host*/lin
Hi,
On 30-04-18 12:59, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I'm sending this to the fedora-kernel and -devel lists
both to get the kernel team aware of this and because it
is not entirely clea
disks.
Greetings,
Christian
On 04/29/2018 11:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 29-04-18 10:42, Christian Dersch wrote:
Hi,
should I also get the freeze from the F28 live media?
Yes, you should, but I just got the second of the 3 users reporting
this to confirm that on his T450s the hang happens r
hotkeys and through the system-menu
(top right menu of the gnome shell top-bar).
Regards,
Hans
I have a T450s
(which worked fine with your LPM test kernels few months ago) but cannot
migrate to 28 yet. >
Greetings,
Christian
On 04/29/2018 10:34 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 29-04-18 09
Hi,
On 29-04-18 09:25, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I'm sending this to the fedora-kernel and -devel lists
both to get the kernel team aware of this and because it
is not entirely clear to me how to best deal with this.
I guess we should get this added to the release-notes /
common-bugs
Hi All,
I'm sending this to the fedora-kernel and -devel lists
both to get the kernel team aware of this and because it
is not entirely clear to me how to best deal with this.
I guess we should get this added to the release-notes /
common-bugs page for F28, but I'm not sure what the
procedure is
Hi Andrew,
On 05-02-18 23:02, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like
Hi,
On 05-02-18 22:45, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello, Hans.
On Thursday, 01 February 2018 at 12:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
[...]
If you can spare 10 minutes, please see my blogpost for how to test
this and send me a mail with the info request in the blogp
Hi,
On 01-02-18 15:59, Don Zickus wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:34:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also
Hi All,
For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable
Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics, some quick tests
have shown this to save another 0.5W (when
Hi,
On 05-01-18 15:03, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 14:16 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
- Add VirtualBox Guest Additions package to the default package list
for the Workstation product
I don't understand this one, VirtualBox Guest should *only* be
installed in an virtual machine .
Hi All,
As part of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
I'm pushing a change to the Fedora Rawhide kernel to enable the new
med_power_with_dipm sata link powermanagement policy by default on
mobile Intel chipsets (Laptops, NuCs, etc.).
The good news about this change
Hi,
On 16-11-17 15:42, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Kurik said:
* Enable USB autosuspend for USB bluetooth receivers by default. If
all other USB devices on the laptop also have USB auto-suspend enabled
(which typically is true) this saves aprox. 0.4 Watts of power on an
idle lapto
Hi,
On 08-11-17 16:06, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
I don't think static linking against libcups is common enough to be a
serious concern - CUPS is fairly ubiquitous and easily falls under the
"OS-supplied library&quo
Hi,
On 08-11-17 15:06, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:54:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
Is there anyone who could raise concerns to Apple about the license
change? Maybe convince them to dual-license it or something?
Well, Michael Sweet (mswet AT apple.com) remains the primar
Hi,
On 21-10-17 20:50, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 09/14/2017 04:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
My next project for Red Hat is to work on improving Linux laptop battery
life.
Part of the (hopefully) low hanging fruit here is using kernel tunables to
enable more runtime powermanagement. My
Hi,
On 26-09-17 16:59, Germano Massullo wrote:
This message may be useful to others having my similar problem.
On a Thinkpad X220, after having booted the custom kernel, running
[root@machine]# cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy
I get
max_performance
instead of
med_
Hi,
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Thank you for the extensive explanation!
>
> Ok, at the end of each day I will give a look to "dmesg", just to be
> sure that everything went fine.
> I will also check for firmware updates before starting the tests.
>
> A few questions/statements:
> 1) is it okay to
Hi,
On 17-09-17 17:26, Germano Massullo wrote:
Il 17/09/2017 15:39, Hans de Goede ha scritto:
Hi,
On 14-09-17 14:44, Germano Massullo wrote:
Hi Hans, I can provide ~10 different Thinkpad models to test your code.
Looking forward to start!
That is great, thank you.
I'm looking forwa
Hi,
On 14-09-17 14:44, Germano Massullo wrote:
Hi Hans, I can provide ~10 different Thinkpad models to test your code.
Looking forward to start!
That is great, thank you.
I'm looking forward to hear back from you with the results.
Regards,
Hans
__
Hi All,
My next project for Red Hat is to work on improving Linux laptop battery life.
Part of the (hopefully) low hanging fruit here is using kernel tunables to
enable more runtime powermanagement. My first target here is SATA Link Power
Management (LPM) which, as Matthew Garrett blogged about 2
Hi,
On 07/27/2017 04:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 01:49 -0400, David Airlie wrote:
So, should this package be added to base-x ? Should something depend on
it? Should X actually start up without libEGL.so.1, and I should file
*that* as a bug? Thanks!
Hans might answer this
Hi,
On 16-07-17 12:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Slightly late to the party but please have a look at how open-vm-tools
(VMware) works. Some observations:
(1) Anaconda has a special comps group for hypervisors. If Anaconda
is able to detect virtualization, it will install extra packages from
Hi,
On 14-07-17 14:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07-07-17 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 08:14 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
We want to make the
Hi,
On 12-07-17 20:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
This is a notice to see if people are really interested in having a
SIG on 32 bit Intel. I haven't created a SIG so I am researching what
is needed but I started with this page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/x86
which mirrors the
Hi,
On 12-07-17 18:34, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I find this response not helpful at all, what I see happening here is:
Person a: We need help
Person b: Ok what can I do
Person a: We need help figure it out yourself
Person b: Huh, so there
Hi,
On 12-07-17 16:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 12-07-17 15:18, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Hans de Goede
wrote:
Hi,
On 11-07-17 22:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Dominik 'Ra
Hi,
On 12-07-17 14:40, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
If cost is an issue, consider to drop all these ppc, arm, s370 and
mips targets.
Their user base is like magnitudes smaller than the i686 user base,
while these target are having a sign
Hi,
On 12-07-17 14:36, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: No More i686 Kernels =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
>
I hereby formally object against this being
categorized as a "Self Contained Change" it clearly
is not.
Regards,
Hans
Hi,
On 12-07-17 15:18, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11-07-17 22:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 22:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
I ran
Hi,
On 11-07-17 22:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 22:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
I ran into this unannounced change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
I noticed this i
Hi,
On 07-07-17 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 08:14 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
We want to make the default installation do the right thing, as far
as
possible, on any system, without any explicit confi
Hi,
On 03-06-17 18:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
Crawl is not correctly working because of lack of directory permissions.
How can i correctly/safely set that permissions for saving data files of
Crawl?
Bugzilla ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458489
Affected package: h
Hi,
On 08-04-17 23:33, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am 08.04.2017 um 23:27 schrieb Hans de Goede:
Hi,
On 08-04-17 23:22, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Hello folks,
since yesterday was some discussion around thermald, I decided to submit it for
review [1]. If someon
Hi,
On 08-04-17 23:22, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Hello folks,
since yesterday was some discussion around thermald, I decided to submit it for
review [1]. If someone wants to volunteer…
The URL is wrong, it should be: https://github.com/01org/thermal_daemon
(noticed while taking a quick
Hi,
On 22-02-17 03:42, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Ter, 2017-01-10 at 15:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
A while back Debian has switched to using the modesetting Xorg driver
rather then the intel Xorg driver for Intel GPUs.
There are several good reasons for this, rather then repeating them
Hi,
On 14-02-17 14:24, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there
are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other probl
Hi,
On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote:
Hello Hans,
(adding some more folks on CC..)
You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there
are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other problem is
that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. t
Hi,
On 13-02-17 10:05, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2017-02-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
Hi all,
redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool
back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main
Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party
201 - 300 of 599 matches
Mail list logo
