Re: lua 5.2

w00t! On May 10, 2013 3:55 PM, "Tom Callaway" wrote: > You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide > (and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2. > > Please be patient. :) > > ~tom > > == > Fedora Project > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https:

Re: Re: dietlibc

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Frank Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann <[1] > fedora-de...@tuxad.de> > >wrote: > > Hello, > > I freshly subscribed t

Re: Re: dietlibc

AX/ > ) > > What's the current status of dietlibc in Fedora and how can it be checked? > Last built was done by Jon Ciesla on 2013-03-27. > > Unmaintained how? Speaking as the current maintainer, my plans have been to migrate any packages using it to glibc, but the keep die

Re: Review swap

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, > so > > I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks! &g

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:45 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > wrote: > > On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >> > > Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the > netinstall > > and or ks and desktop users will us

Review swap

I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, so I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks! -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel

Re: audacity

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. > That's doesn't appear to be true. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to deal with that.

Re: CVE-2013-1888

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Has been open for a long time >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=923974<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: CVE-2013-1888

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Has been open for a long time > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=923974 > > Can someone push an update? > > I'll update to 1.3.1 sometime this morning unless there ar

Re: New version a new version of Maxima in Sourceforge

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Eduardo Jorge wrote: >There is a fresh, new version of Maxima in sourceforge: 5.30.0. Please > update Maxima. Thank you. > > >Eduardo Jorge > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Xboard and gnuchess updates

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Eduardo Jorge wrote: > It's very important to update gnuchess to version 6.0.3 and xboard > to version 4.7.0 in Rawhide. These are packages from GNU and they use > artificial intelligence and they are include in Fedora Spin Gamaes. > Thank you! > > Hav

Re: aarch64 bugs

lic and that is not a decision that we have direct control over). Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: aarch64 bugs

e what I'll say is "watch this space". You won't be waiting all that long now. Fedora has been well taken care of in the planning to get AArch64 support completed. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fedora release name problem

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:47 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 23:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On 18/03/13 10:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:56:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >

Re: dnf installs cron.hourly

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:03AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange < > berra...@redhat.c

Re: dnf installs cron.hourly

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > Users shouldn't have to go searching out that kind of thing in a > > separate package IMHO, it could just be part of stock yum install. > > If it needs to be optional a conf

Re: How to update to Ruby 2.0.0 in Rawhide?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 13.3.2013 14:01, Jon Ciesla napsal(a): > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> >> I just got notification of this broken dependency: >> >> libguestfs has broken d

Re: How to update to Ruby 2.0.0 in Rawhide?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I just got notification of this broken dependency: > > libguestfs has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: > On x86_64: > 1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21.19-1.fc19.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = > 0:1.9.1 > [etc] > > No problem with that.

Re: Problem in rawhide with ld and weak symbols?

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Building LibreOffice for x86_64 starting to fail in an odd way recently, < > http://koji.fedoraproject.**org/koji/getfile?taskID=** > 5091173&name=build.log&offset=**-4000

Re: dietlibc

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jon Ciesla wrote: > > I see no reason not to keep dietlibc around for development use, but I'd > > rather see packages use glibc. > > We agree then. But if we want to keep dietlibc, it needs to be fixed to &

Re: dietlibc

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: > > I recalled this set of issues too from my previous time in fesco but I > > didn't find the meeting logs with the information. I did find this > meeting > > log: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: dietlibc

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/01/2013 11:20 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:46:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> Matthew Miller wrote: >>> Historical footnote: I believe it was initially added to help squeeze the boot porti

Re: Maintainers wanted for packages from 2013-02-27 FESCo Meeting

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> * fedora-usermgmt (epel branches still owned by ensc) >> * hunt >> * ip-sentinel >> * kismet >> * libextr

Re: Maintainers wanted for packages from 2013-02-27 FESCo Meeting

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Greetings, > > * fedora-usermgmt (epel branches still owned by ensc) > * hunt > * ip-sentinel > * kismet > * libextractor > Taken. -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in yo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

spe taken. -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass > > rebuild: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411 > > Thanks for heads up! This is a b

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > >> I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work? >> >> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**curlish/<https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cur

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>&g

Re: Orphaning PycURL

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >>> On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: >>> Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone

Re: Orphaning agg

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I am hereby orphaning agg in all Fedora branches. (In EPEL, it is owned by > orion.) I had picked up agg long ago as a dependency of Gnash, but I handed > over Gnash to hicham months ago and so I don't have any personal interest > in >

Re: Ownership released: seeker, vdr-skins, vdr-text2skin, vdr-wapd

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hello, > > I've released ownership of the following low maintenance packages I > haven't used in a while. None of these have any co-maintainers. > > Branches in Fedora and EPEL: > - seeker: Random access disk benchmark utility > > Taken. -J

Re: Announcing: Fedora ARM Technical Talks

On 02/15/2013 02:32 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > Please see the following link for further details: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Talks/ARMTechTalks > > Today's talk is on debugging vexpress (Versatile Express) kernels > running under qemu models with gdb.

Re: ConsoleKit and esound retirement

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 12.02.13 13:52, Jon Ciesla (limburg...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > So to clarify, you're not actually retiring anything currently, just > > > > expressing to the community that you&

Re: ConsoleKit and esound retirement

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 12.02.13 12:38, Jon Ciesla (limburg...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > since a while now l

Re: ConsoleKit and esound retirement

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > since a while now logind has replaced CK in Fedora. I'd like to retire > it entirely from the distribution now. > > Most deps on CK are gone. Holdouts are "cdm", "lightdm", "lxsession", > "lxdm". > > https://fedoraproject.org/

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/05/2013 09:31 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > >> On 5 February 2013 20:10, Alec Leamas wrote: >> >> I wouldn't say Fedora "follows blindly" but rather chooses an upstream >>> from >>> some alternatives (their ability to handle feedback from

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius > wrote: > > I disagree. Fedora's lack of popularity is largely thanks to these > issues. > > > > In this context, I feel the Cinnamon request rsp. the "give users a > choice > > on DEs" attempts

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

#x27;t yet met a linux user who was not driven in part by curiosity. Maybe I don't get out enough. This is just one idea of how a selection of different DE can be presented without it being an onerous choice, I'm sure the most excellent UI-oriented people we have contributing to Fedora c

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd features

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 02/01/2013 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:44 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> >>> On 02/01/2013 04:21 AM, David Tardon wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:46:33PM +, "Jóhann B. Gu

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Dan Mashal" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:13:34 PM > > Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon a

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2013/1/29 Vít Ondruch : > > Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): > > > >> > >> Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per > >> release. > >> > >> Maybe this is the best solution. > >> > >> > > > > It m

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Mathieu Bridon > wrote: > > On 01/29/2013 08:25 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> > >> I'm sure QA, releng, docs, etc will go with what the community decides. > > > > > > Why would they? > > > > They are community too

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: > >> On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with >> > them 5 minutes? >> >> Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x tra

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with > > them 5 minutes? > > Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x transition? Similarly to how there > are forks of GNOME now to '

Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup

Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity. Peter Robinson wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: Peter Robinson >> To: Development discussions related to Fedora >> Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>

Re: taking over ownership of glusterfs

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Matthias Saou has released ownership so that I can take over. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Package_SCM_admin_requestsindicates > that I can use the > https://admin.fedorapr

Fedora ARM status meeting minutes for 2012-12-19

ope to all live long enough to have the "End of the World" beta release posted later on today. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora ARM status meeting 2012-12-19

us on images, VFAD 1) Current Problem packages - What's up with F19? 2) FUDCon and PA planning 3) Your topic here If you have any other items you would like to discuss that are not mentioned, please feel free to send an email to the list or bring it up at the end of the mee

Fedora ARM status meeting 2012-12-12

mages (Beagleboard XM, etc) 4) F18 and kernel VFADs planning 5) Your topic here If you have any other items you would like to discuss that are not mentioned, please feel free to send an email to the list or bring it up at the end of the meeting. Jon. -- devel mailing list

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

pondering downstream consumers of Fedora also) in having a smaller core and treating everything that comes on top equally. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

t do an Apple (iOS) App Store where that's the only way to get bits, do it like they do on the desktop where there's still choice. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

On 12/07/2012 12:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:40:13AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: >>> We could draw them between Core and Extras! >> :) Note that just because we got rid of Core doesn't mean that it was a >> bad idea. Ubuntu even adopted

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

Core doesn't mean that it was a bad idea. Ubuntu even adopted a "Core" of their own a while back. Maybe they'll have the same experience we had and get away from that, or maybe Linux distributions should ultimately not be in the business of providing all+kitchen sink. Speaking only personally, what I want is a stable core platform of very limited size against which I can install other packages and stacks. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?

Fedora is much smaller, and the grand Fedora universe contains things that > are packaged *for* one or multiple Fedoras. > > That would be *epicly* *awesome* in so many ways, and it'll never happen. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora ARM status meeting 2012-12-05

with a working compiler for netcdf. I can't reproduce the problems we had with that in either a local v5 or v7, or a mock v5 or v7, and a scratch build succeeded earlier as well of the -3 release, which is what we need to end up with anyway. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121204 changes

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote: > > Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012 > > VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18! > > > Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way! > > ~tom > > == > Fedora

Re: forked library

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > ** > Hi, > > I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version though > depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original library, since the idjc > upstream developer wanted some extra functionality on libshout and didn't > wan

Re: need help with a package

- Original Message - > From: "Alexander Aristotle Davis" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "jon vanalten" > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:58:27 AM > Subject: RE: need help with a package > > hello Jo

Re: need help with a package

git is the change in URL. I'll just point out that, even though upstream is not actively developing this software, changing the URL from the upstream page to an empty wiki page seems not to be the best idea. Good luck! jon [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.11 alpha coming soon to rawhide near you

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/22/2012 10:07 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 18:15:26 GMT, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Panu Matilainen < >>> pmati...@laiskiainen.org>

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.11 alpha coming soon to rawhide near you

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 11/20/2012 07:45 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Panu Matilainen >> > <mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.**org>> >> wrote: >> >> >>

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.11 alpha coming soon to rawhide near you

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Now that FESCo accepted > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Features/RPM4.11for > F19... (in what might well be a record time - less than a minute in the > meeting from proposal to acceptanc

Re: MPI updates

t, I've made a patch that fixes ARMv5/v6/v7 atomics "properly" (it's a kludge, sending it upstream for them to look at). I can now build on ARM, and have sent the patch over to Peter/Fedora ARM list. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning LibRaw and gource

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > Hi, > > I don't have enough bandwidth to do anything useful with them any more, > so I'm orphaning them. LibRaw is a dependency for shotwell and gource > is, well, pretty neat. > > Taken, thanks for your work! -J > Siddhesh > -- > dev

Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:00 AM, David Cantrell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:32:57PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:48:26PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > On 11/08/2012 02:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > >What kind of structure would you imagin

Re: MPI updates

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/01/2012 04:21 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > >> On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:08:36 -0600 >> Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> Some MPI updates: >>> >>> - I built openmpi 1.6.3 in rawhide yesterday. This had an unexpected >>> bump in the libmpi_f9

Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 + >> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> >> On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> =?UTF-8?B?**IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc2**9uIg==?=

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

Indeed. If someone owns 4 packages that are all stable and have no bug reports, are they inactive? -J On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > =?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?= > writes: > > On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> How exactly are you going to fo

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-10-24)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-10-24) === Meeting started by limburgher at 17:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-10-24/fesco.2012-10-24-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: How do I find the maintainers of a package ?

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Alain Williams wrote: > Hi, > > when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I > think > would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the > attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2012-10-24)

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > - Original Message - >> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo >> meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on >> irc.freenode.net. >> >> Links to all tickets below can be found at: >

Re: The GNOME 3.6.1 Megaupdate

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 16 October 2012 15:11, Kalev Lember wrote: >> If anybody wants to add builds to the GNOME 3.6.1 update, now is the >> time to do it. Like usual, please use the spreadsheet: > > Cheers for doing this. I'm off until next week on paternity

Re: Unusual SCM Request?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Paul Flo Williams wrote: > I'm trying to make an SCM Request on a Package Review ticket to add a > pseudo-user (the Fonts SIG) to a fonts package that has already been > approved. > I'd like to do a number of these, but I've started with bug 857487: > > https://bug

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Peter Gordon wrote: > Please add these two to the list: > > * meld (EPEL 5, EPEL 6) > * opengl-games-utils (EPEL 6) Orphaned, take them. -J > > Thanks. > -- > Peter Gordon (codergeek42) > Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me > > > -- > devel mailing lis

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are >> in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply >> orphan th

Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

-- Forwarded message -- From: Przemek Klosowski Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM Subject: Re: Packages in need of new maintainers To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 20

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2012-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> kBuild -- A cross-platform build environment > > This could be orphan, kmk_sed fails if kBuild was compiled with gcc 4.7 > and upstream doesn't fix it. > >

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Michal Ingeli wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 09:09 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are >> > in need of new maintain

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:33 AM, gil wrote: > hi > i take (made a request to become a co-maintainer) > these lkundrak's packages: > > gant (already updated to the latest version, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863198 ) > > if there aren't requests from other people. I'll take owners

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Jon Ciesla [04/10/2012 16:31] : >> >> FAS username? > > eseyman Could you do me a huge favor, since there are a lot of these, and provide a revised list? :) -J > Emmanuel > -- > devel mailing list &

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are > in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply > orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in >

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All. > > 2012/10/3 Jon Ciesla : >> As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are >> in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply >> orphan them all,

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Peter Gordon wrote: > On 10/03/2012 11:23 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> meld -- Visual diff and merge tool >> opengl-games-utils -- Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching >> 3d games > > I can take these two, if no one el

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:09:58PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:58:36PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> > H

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Jon Ciesla [03/10/2012 22:02] : >> > Please reply to the list with any requests for ownership changes, and > I'll complete them on a first-come, first-served basis. > > I'll gladly take the following: &g

Re: Fwd: Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to take over NetworkManager-pptp. FAS name? -J > Patrick > > On Oct 4, 2012 6:01 AM, "gil" wrote: >> >> hi >> i take (made a request to become a co-maintainer) >> these lkundrak's packages: >> >> java_cup >> ja

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 10/03/2012 08:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> Please reply to the list with any requests for ownership changes, and >> I'll complete them on a first-come, first-served basis. >> >> The current list

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > > 2012/10/3 Jon Ciesla : > >> dmg2img -- Uncompress the Apple compressed disk image files > > I can take this if nobody volunteers. It doesn't look like something > required much attention. >

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:23:02PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> s3cmd -- Tool for accessing Amazon Simple Storage Service > > I'll take this. It's python, cloud-related, and should be low stress. Done. -J >

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > Le 03/10/2012 20:23, Jon Ciesla a écrit : >> >> libgda -- Library for writing gnome database programs >> > You probably meant compat-libgda which should be dropped (compat-libgda => > 3.x, libgda => 4.x, libg

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:58:36PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > Hmmm. The virtmaint team is the owner of QEMU in the Fedora devel/18/17/16 >> > collections, and lkundrak is the owner in EPEL 6. But do we even _have_ &

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:23:02PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> qemu -- QEMU is a FAST! processor emulator > > Hmmm. The virtmaint team is the owner of QEMU in the Fedora devel/18/17/16 > collections, and lkundrak is the ow

Re: Orphaning a couple of packages

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > Correction: Just the following packages: > > Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Fabian Deutsch: >> auto-nng >> libmatheval Taken. -J >> xmlenc > > Sorry for the noise. > > - fabian > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.f

Re: replacing folders with symlinks leads to rpm cpio rename errors

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 21.09.2012 10:34, Stanislav Ochotnicky pisze: >> Quoting Julian Sikorski (2012-09-21 08:53:26) >>> Hi list, >>> >>> one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the >>> folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this l

Re: How can I best tie together "cloud" bugs in bugzilla?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > I would like to, for both my purposes and for others, tag a number of > bugzilla entries as of interest to the cloud sig. If this were my own little > private project bugzilla, I would make a keyword. I don't think that really > meshes with

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Lubomir Rintel (cglib, jfreechart)

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to get OSGi metadata added to the cglib and > jfreechart packages. Unfortunately I've heard no response for ~3 weeks. > Does anybody know how to contact him (bug-email of maintainer CC'd)? > > I'm willing to tak

Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Álvaro Castillo wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop >> defaults, AFAIK. > > > Mmm, sorry, I cannot understand very well. Im spanish and my english is > li

Re: Orphaning 4 packages

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote: > I'm going to release ownership of 4 of my packages because I do not use > them anymore for quite a while now. > These are: > > bzr-explorer: The GUI frontend for the bzr version control system. > Because the latest upstream version requires b

Re: Rawhide boot problems

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 18:30:10 +0200, > Lennart Poettering wrote: >> >> On Wed, 29.08.12 08:44, Jim Meyering (j...@meyering.net) wrote: >> >> So this happened because somebody updated the Rawhide package, which >> disabled package inhe

Re: Does anyone know how to contact Axel Thimm (ath...@atrpms.net)

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Henrique Junior wrote: > > > From: Eric Sandeen > > To: Development discussions related to Fedora >>Cc: axel.th...@atrpms.net; Patrick Uiterwijk >>Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 12:17 PM >>Subject: Re: Does anyone know how to contact Axel Thimm (ath...@atrpm

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >