On 05/27/2014 04:14 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
the f21-python side tag, containing Python 3.4, has been merged into Rawhide.
Awesome, thanks for the hard work.
We managed to rebuild 216 packages out of 452 that BR: python3-devel and 7
that BR: python3 - these were the packages (or
Hello Jeff,
Welcome! I'm glad you've decided to get those packages in Fedora proper.
That's how we build a great OS: together :-)
Please don't hesitate to write to this mailing list if you have any
questions or need help.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
If you've been using GNOME 3.12 and updating packages with
gnome-software, you might have run into an issue with the update process
leaving behind a lot of duplicate packages:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730451
This turned out to be an issue with PackageKit's Fedora
On 05/06/2014 12:25 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
snip
%{_libexecdir} and %{_libdir}/$pkg are both valid in the packaging
guidelines.
Yep, and both valid variants differ from what other distros use. Debian
uses /usr/lib/$pkg for @libexecdir@.
snip
If upstream is using the autotools you
On 05/05/2014 10:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:24:03PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
It causes pointless configure and Makefile complications in every single
upstream project that wants to install something into that location and
has to differentiate between Fedora
commit 6d42ec63ef82ff0e9a837b67eb9f6684dbd74b5b
Author: Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com
Date: Thu May 1 12:15:33 2014 +0200
Rebuilt for libgtop2 soname bump
perl-GTop.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-GTop.spec b/perl-GTop.spec
On 04/30/2014 12:22 PM, Matej Stuchlik wrote:
Good day folks,
Python 3.4 is now [ready and tagged] in f21-python, so I'd like to ask you
to make whatever modifications that may be necessary and [rebuild] your
Python packages into the tag. Once we have sufficient fraction up and running,
we'll
On 04/29/2014 12:31 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 28.04.14 15:11, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Apr 28, 2014 5:01 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
The problem is lots of services require systemd because they ship a
unit file and want systemctl reload to
On 04/30/2014 04:28 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
If you are right, this is an argument for rpm collections, which we've
had for ages now and should really start using.
YES!
Getting rid of the copy-pasted rpm scriptlets would be a huge win. They
are error prone and require huge effort to get them
On 04/30/2014 04:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 04/30/2014 10:05 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
For example, when a package bar has a postinstall script that does:
systemctl enable bar.service /dev/null 21 || :
.. but if systemctl gets installed _after_ foo in the same transaction
On 04/08/2014 01:44 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 3.4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_3.4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz elsupergo...@fedoraproject.org
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 3.4
== Detailed
On 04/09/2014 12:42 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
So yes, FESCo should take it into consideration but I'd like to avoid
situation when this Change will be banned solely on not a
maintainer.
Yes -- I am hoping that someone who understands the Mono stack and has
distro-wide commit access would step
On 04/04/2014 05:55 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Perhaps a versioned dependency on glib2 would be worth adding somewhere,
but anyway I would not see this problem if this were a normal Fedora update,
because then I'd get the package for both archs.
Good idea. I've now added versioned dependencies
On 03/29/2014 02:39 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
By way of libGL linking LLVM, if some other library uses a private LLVM, and
an application links both libGL and that library, it crashes due to symbol
conflicts.
Ah yes, that's an excellent point. Thanks Kevin!
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
On 03/28/2014 04:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
RHEL's Mesa at this point links against a private build of llvm that
is explicitly _not_ part of The Platform, for exactly this reason:
it's not something we can commit to supporting for any use beyond
Mesa itself, even in the extreme short term.
On 03/19/2014 01:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
There is also a proposal for a Fedora Plasma product based around KDE. I'm
personally a little skeptical but listening -- I think want a technology
showcase masquerading as a product would miss the point, and I'd like to be
convinced that this is
On 03/19/2014 01:35 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:29:24PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
KDE should be release blocking. It's strongly represented in Fedora,
both in terms of users and available developer resources. We should make
sure KDE is fully functional before rolling
On 03/10/2014 06:55 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
That makes sense to me (although maybe there should be a special case for
F20 - Fedora Workstation to make migration easier?).
A close enough heuristic should be to look if the user has gnome-shell
installed and install the Workstation config
On 03/08/2014 10:50 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.03.2014 14:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.03.2014 14:05, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:53:24 +0100
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build qt-creator [1], but the builds fail due to the
arm build timing out.
On 03/08/2014 06:28 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 8 March 2014 18:24, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
mailto:methe...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have direct access to a personal scanner anymore and don't
have the time to handle bug reports without a device to test. I
have
On 03/08/2014 11:15 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 08.03.2014 23:10, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/08/2014 10:50 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Argh, it timed out again [1]. Any other suggestions?
Try reducing the debuginfo level for arm. C++ code sometimes leads to
massive debuginfo which could be gigabytes
On 03/03/2014 10:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.2.2014 20:51, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:37 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 February 2014 15:38, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
This should not break builds of any reasonably current software.
Hello,
I've just built cogl 1.17.4 for rawhide, which includes a soname bump. I
am going to run a script to rebuild all consumers (38, list below), but
since it's quite a few packages, some of them might fail to rebuild, for
unrelated reasons. Help appreciated if one of these shows up in the
On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
The following need to be reviewed by the maintainer as there's a
number of builds or other issues:
plymouth
cups-filters
I have fixed plymouth:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/plymouth.git/commit/?id=714e0ef
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
Hi all,
GNOME 3.10.0 release is this week and we're going to collect all the
builds together and filing them as a single Bodhi megaupdate for F20.
As usual, the spreadsheet for collecting all the builds together is at
Hi all,
GNOME 3.9.92 release is this week and we're going to collect all the
builds together and file them as a single Bodhi megaupdate for F20.
As usual, the spreadsheet for collecting all the builds together is at
On 09/02/2013 05:44 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a bit unfortunate
timing wrt. Fedora freezes. In any case, we'll handle the GNOME 3.9.91
builds together and file them as a single megaupdate in Bodhi.
GNOME 3.9.91 builds are now done and made
Hi all,
It's that time of the year again -- F20 is going into the Alpha freeze
tomorrow and new builds will have to go through Bodhi for verification.
The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a bit unfortunate
timing wrt. Fedora freezes. In any case, we'll handle the GNOME 3.9.91
builds
On 09/02/2013 07:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Could we have avoided this conflict by scheduling better in advance?
We might have been able to do slightly better, because GNOME schedules
are published in advance and set pretty much in stone. In the end, it's
hard to plan for this though because
On 08/27/2013 07:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
I'd like to be able to commit to master, check out the f20 branch, and
'git cherry-pick master'.
Is that really that much difference than git diff | sed | patch?
I believe it is, yes. Relying on diff
On 08/25/2013 01:17 AM, Till Maas wrote:
the comps git repo currently contains comps files for EOL releases,
which makes grep more cumbersome, because one needs to specify the
current non-EOL releases to grep only in them. Also it makes the default
make target take unecessarily long, because
Hi,
Just a quick heads up that GNOME 3.9.90 builds have landed in today's
Branched (F20) and Rawhide.
This is the first Beta release towards GNOME 3.10 and marks the
beginning of the UI and API freezes. Next up is GNOME 3.9.91 on
September 4th.
I am personally running F20 here with the latest
On 08/23/2013 03:42 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
What about this?
perl(Digest::SHA)
I've seen many broken ones because of it now.
I'd like to know, too. The perl-Digest-SHA package is still in the
fedpkg
On 08/17/2013 01:47 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Will the bluez-compat be killed in this move?
Yes, already gone in the rawhide package:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/commit/?id=e321c716dddf55724776b8686de01cd7f45cbc4a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754523
--
On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases [...]
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
--
Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FTBFS packages need:
1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
still have earlier dist tags
[snip]
Nevertheless, as far as I can see there is nothing
Hi all,
FESCo accepted BlueZ 5 for F20 at yesterday's meeting and I've gone
ahead and imported it in Rawhide.
Small status report where we currently stand:
bluez- updated to 5.8
gnome-bluetooth - updated to 3.9.3 that has BlueZ 5 support
gnome-user-share - won't get ported in
On 08/14/2013 06:29 PM, Than Ngo wrote:
it's effected in KDE (libbluedevil). someone is working on this, but
it's not expected the bluez5 support will be ready for F20!
So f21 is Ok as goal, but f20 is definitely to early for KDE!
I brought this up at a KDE meeting [1] last month and Kevin
On 08/13/2013 11:11 AM, Rave it wrote:
mate-bluetooth doesn't support bluez5, and upstream doesn't have started to
port it.
I don't expect that is is ready before f20 alpha or beata.
So it would be very nice not to push bluez5 into f20.
Also Cristofph Wickert asked me to clean up runtime
On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
Other probs are:
1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MATE needs to be
added.
3. Also runtime
On 08/13/2013 08:06 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The page looks good, thanks for coordination. Just could you please extend
the scope with resolution for mate bt? Also for contingency plan, I'd like
to see a real deadline - Beta as a point to revert things as a coordination
would be needed. Once
On 08/13/2013 10:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:13:20PM -0400, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
I believe there's something wrong in Koji Rawhide buildroot, as it
appears nothings provides /sbin/ldconfig.
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: foo
DEBUG util.py:264:
On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
behind, but it's probably best if we
On 08/08/2013 05:12 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.24.0 at 19th of August.
There are several changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.37 to
libpoppler.so.43). It also adds support for Qt5.
If you already have everything prepared, perhaps it's worth
On 08/06/2013 03:52 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Dear developers (esp the GNOME team),
Vala 0.21.1 has just been released, which bumps the API level to 0.22
from the 0.20 we're currently shipping.
From prior releases, we can't quite predict whether the final 0.22
release will be out
Hi,
I am working on building the new cogl 1.15.4 release (and the matching
clutter) for rawhide. This includes a libcogl soname bump, which affects
33 source packages.
I'll handle the rebuilds and I'm hoping to finish these before
tomorrow's rawhide compose starts. Unfortunately the rebuilds
On 08/09/2013 09:33 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi,
I am working on building the new cogl 1.15.4 release (and the matching
clutter) for rawhide. This includes a libcogl soname bump, which affects
33 source packages.
I'll handle the rebuilds and I'm hoping to finish these before
tomorrow's
On 08/01/2013 07:52 PM, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
I've recently been approached about one of the packages I maintain,
Blueman, an alternative Bluetooth Manager.
At the time I packaged it, it was actively being developed, however
development has stopped for over a year [1]. The project's domain
On 08/01/2013 07:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I was kind of expecting this would have landed by now though, Bastien
will be @ GUADEC this week so not sure if he'll respond quickly
We'll discuss this at GUADEC and I'll follow up here once we figure out
a plan what to do.
It's possible that
On 07/15/2013 10:36 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No Default Sendmail =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail
Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering net, Matthew
Miller mattdm at fedoraproject org
No longer install an MTA
2013-07-02 22:00, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:18:06 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Fedora ARM has all the features of the primary architectures
Is this really accurate?
I has them, they
2013-06-27 20:57, Elio Maldonado Batiz skrev:
I brought this up with the nss/nspr team upstream. Kai added a good
explanation for them and proposedchanging the naming scheme two use
three numbersalwaysas the long term solution. Until that is accepted and
implemented upstream option (1) is a
Hi Martin,
Definitely not a rpm bug. rpm's version comparison semantics are well
defined and 4.10.0 is strictly higher than 4.10.
I would say one of the 3 things should happen to fix this:
1) Build the latest nspr release not as version 4.10, but as 4.10.0
(As I understand it, it's a
2013-05-06 11:13, Peter Robinson skrev:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
Heya,
In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices.
Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatible with Bluez4[1] and as
such, management applications and a
2013-06-16 16:47, Pavel Alexeev skrev:
[snip]
So, is there any chance to force apply these patches (as provenpackager
I can do it itself)? Or I only may wait next apache release or apply
again such ugly hacks with sources?
Disclaimer: I am not familiar with the issue at hand, and I'm not
2013-06-16 17:17, Michael Scherer skrev:
Yep :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974778
In short, fix /usr/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon-localeexec to remove
', not ','.
Can you give a try to gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.3-3.fc19 ? This should
fix up the issue with the extra quotes.
2013-06-03 13:48, Simone Caronni skrev:
any provenpackager willing to push these 2 fixes? One is really trivial
and the other one is simply a typo.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883983
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948613
I have fixed the Brasero issue; the 2nd
2013-05-30 10:07, Petr Hracek skrev:
Ok, well.
It seems that libpng15 compatibility package is built in rawhide.
What are the next steps?
Tagged already built libpng(1.6) package?
I do not want to break rawhide completely and
I would like to avoid all mistakes which can be done from my
2013-05-23 00:30, Richard W.M. Jones skrev:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:52:22PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Something I'm just now running into - I have a package that can make
use of one of two different backends, but it definitely needs one of
them. I don't want to pick which one in the
2013-05-20 09:03, Petr Hracek skrev:
Just a one short question.
You are talking about side tag.
Could you please describe me what are you talking about?
It seems like I am a newbie.
Koji organizes builds by labelling them with tags. There's a a tag for
f19, a tag for f19-updates, a tag for
2013-05-17 12:20, Petr Hracek skrev:
Hi folks,
in order that BZ (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113)
libpng library was bumped.
[snip]
Please rebuild your packages with new libpng library
Here is the list:
[snip, 306 packages]
Hi Petr,
Very cool to get updated libpng!
2013-05-17 13:17, Kalev Lember skrev:
The issue is that once this is in, all the 306 packages above will have
broken dependencies. And it's not just simple rebuilds that are
required; we'd need _ordered_ rebuilds in dependency order: build deps
that require the old libpng can't be installed
On 29/04/13 18:41, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro
mike.catanz...@gmail.com mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, except it's more than just glchess (now known as gnome-chess) that
is missing; it seems only about half of the games got
On 11/05/13 20:01, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
librsvg2 - gtk3;
I have done a librsvg2 build which should fix this -- can you confirm if
it fixes it for you, and leave karma at Bodhi, please?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.37.0-3.fc19
--
Hope this helps,
Kalev
--
devel mailing
On 01/05/13 01:37, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 30.04.2013 11:38, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 29/04/13 16:58, Sandro Mani wrote:
(FWIW, I guess telepathy-logger should be a dependency of gnome-shell)
I'll look into adding the telepathy-logger dep to gnome-shell. I guess
something should have a dep
Hi,
gnome-panel and gnome-applets just got blocked [1] in koji. We still
have a number of packages depending on gnome-panel, either through
library deps or through Requires: gnome-panel, and all of these are
going to show up as broken deps with the next rawhide and F19 composes.
(They were in a
On 29/04/13 16:58, Sandro Mani wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop
environments which pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa drivers +
displaymanager + bare desktop
On 27/04/13 23:48, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
It looks like all of the gnome games are still at v3.6.1 in Fedora 19...
I guess because they were split into multiple packages upstream. I guess
it's too late to get these into F19 since they are basically new
packages now, but I wanted to give a
On 06/04/13 01:47, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Broken upgrade path report for tags f19 - f20:
[...]
kalev:
vala:
f19 f20 (vala-0.20.0-1.fc19 vala-0.19.0-1.fc19)
Vala build dies with:
+ /usr/bin/emacs -batch --no-init-file --no-site-file --eval '(progn (setq
load-path
On 02/24/2013 08:43 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I have taken ownership of the following packages:
gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
dbus-python,
On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package orca (orphan)
I have picked up orca.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/08/2013 03:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:57:19 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
I have just built boost 1.53. I didn't go through the side tag as
originally envisioned, as tomorrow's mass rebuild should take care of
it all in one fell swoop. I'll still
On 01/27/2013 09:41 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[webkitgtk3]
Tried to rebuild and failed, I suspect what ever the issue that webkitgtk had.
[gnome-shell]
Has grown some circular deps so I asked Kalev to have a look at it, it
was broken due to something else, not sure of the status.
The
On 01/10/2013 09:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Don't be sorry... it turns out that this is not an easy case to fix. :(
It's a archfull package obsoleting/providing a noarch package.
Yum picks the 32bit of the multiarched package to obsolete things.
The only suggestion (thanks kalev) that
On 01/10/2013 10:23 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 10 January 2013 20:58, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
But the better solution I was thinking of is to split colord packaging
into two: one package with the shared library (colord-libs) and another
package with the daemon (colord
On 12/26/2012 11:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[epiphany-extensions]
epiphany-extensions-3.6.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
epiphany(abi) = 0:3.6
Looks like this one needs to be retired now?
Yes.
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875234 a while back
suggesting that
On 11/16/2012 10:13 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Sending this to the relevant package owners as well as the development
list - if there's too much pushback, I'll look at backporting the
patches instead, though given that LLVM 3.2 is scheduled for release
next month, if we agree, going
On 11/13/2012 01:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
The update is now in Bodhi, thanks to everyone who pitched in with builds.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18258
It missed
On 11/15/2012 11:43 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
This is the ticket I've filed to ask QA to consider including this in
the Beta release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876922
(Sorry, messed up the bugzilla link in the original message.)
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel
Hi,
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
If anybody wants to add builds to the GNOME 3.6.2 update, now is the
time to do it. Like usual, please use the spreadsheet:
On 10/23/2012 03:44 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Parallel installable guile interpreters:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may work on the required patches if time
On 10/23/2012 11:42 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
seem
right. The problem is that a lot of things have to be renamed, including some
autotools
If anybody wants to add builds to the GNOME 3.6.1 update, now is the
time to do it. Like usual, please use the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHcpli=1
Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/25/2012 08:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 09/24/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I plan to retire pyclutter pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk unless
anyone speaks up. They're not currently used by anything in Fedora
AFAICT and any new development should be using introspection
On 09/24/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I plan to retire pyclutter pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk unless
anyone speaks up. They're not currently used by anything in Fedora
AFAICT and any new development should be using introspection bindings
anyway.
Hi Peter,
Good plan, I
On 09/23/2012 02:58 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sun Sep 23 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for i386
--
[gnome-contacts]
gnome-contacts-3.5.92-2.fc18.i686 requires libcheese.so.7
On 09/19/2012 12:34 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
1.9.1 pushed to rawhide,f18,f17
Excellent. However, the broken deps still remain. From latest rawhide
report:
[pytrainer]
pytrainer-1.9.1-1.fc19.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
Can you also fix it up to not depend on a package
On 09/20/2012 08:30 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
ease requires clutter-gtk010 (okay, so we drop ease, but...)
clutter-sharp requires clutter-gtk010
All of the following packages require clutter-sharp in F18
I don't think any of these packages really need clutter-sharp. There
appears to be a
On 09/05/2012 07:02 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
The ticket for its non-responsive maintainer Douglas E. Warner is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842894
All reasonable attempts to resolve this have failed. Douglas E. Warner
confirmed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On 09/10/2012 10:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anway, I still believe that the default approach to doing package
development should be to focus on F18 as long as it isn't released,
and only open F19 for a packge if the packager decides he is ready
to. Right now we have the opposite where
Hello,
Anyone interested in picking up pytrainer maintainership? It has broken
deps as shipped in both F16 and F17 and cannot even be installed. Same
issue is also present in latest F18 Branched report:
[pytrainer] pytrainer-1.7.2-4.fc18.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
The ticket for
Hi,
I'm on vacation through August 31 and away from computer. If any updates
or fixes are needed for the packages I maintain, please just push the
changes directly.
Thanks!
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/06/2012 12:51 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
In the meantime, it looks like my Python 3.3 rebuild has broken boost
installs in f18 buildroots until the boost-1.50 build lands in f18.
Sorry about that. Is there an ETA for when the boost stuff will be
On 07/24/2012 07:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged into
rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages from the
rebuild that shouldn't have been?
Downgrading:
[...]
gmime x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18
On 05/27/2012 10:28 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hi.
Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer
provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should
had been done it early off course). It seams addressed in rawhide.
Hi Pavel,
I'm not sure it's a good
On 05/16/2012 03:48 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On 05/09/2012 09:34 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 04:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Cosimo, can you please also make sure that the Close button gets
keyboard focus automatically after I click on Try Fedora?
I now fixed this here [1],
On 05/03/2012 11:22 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday night I noticed an IRC conversation on #fedora-desktop
about this, and suggested that an actual window would be a lot
better than a notification.
Kalev, Matthias and the people there agreed with me, so I went
ahead and wrote
On 05/03/2012 11:05 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
How are the translations going to be handled, Kalev? How do you get
it into spin-kickstarts?
Ideally, I think the welcome screen code should be in anaconda repo and
would be translated in there. But I haven't yet talked to the anaconda
people about
501 - 600 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
