Re: What projects can we highlight for Hacktoberfest?

Maybe Something from the sigs,sigs often require blogs setup etc.That could be a easy starter issue.Jekyll is pretty easy. On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:30 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > > What about the Feedback Pipeline service [1] I'm working on for minimization? > The code [2] is on GitHub and I even

Re: University people in Fedora: Education/University SIG

+1 for this idea,i'd love to join this sig On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:01 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:43 PM Timothée Floure > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a > > few > > weeks ago. Sorry for

Re: Any interest in PySide2 (Qt 5 bindings) for Fedora?

any update on this ? i will be willing to package this as its a dependency for a potential google summer of code project. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Sorry for the really delayed reply. > > > Please take a look at my slides : > > https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC

Re: Clear Linux's make-fmv-patch Eases The Creation Of GCC FMV-Enabled Code Paths

So I am the creator and maintainer of this kmod package for fedora,haven't updated in a while.Will do asap with the new patch. On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 6:08 PM Neal Becker > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=GCC-Clear-make-fmv-patch > > Sounds like interesting tech. >

Re: NeuroFedora review swaps

I am taking this On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, 5:33 PM Ankur Sinha Hello! > > Happy new year, everyone! > > I've got two simple python packages that need review. Would anyone like > to swap reviews, please? > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544: python-tvb-gdist > -

Re: Disabled registration from a certain IP due to a limit.

ver intended. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:32 PM John Harris wrote: > On Monday, December 17, 2018 9:11:30 AM EST Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > GitHub operates independantly i don't see a reason for your worry. > > Setting aside the fact that GitHub is under the Microsoft umbr

Re: Disabled registration from a certain IP due to a limit.

GitHub operates independantly i don't see a reason for your worry. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 7:27 PM Lukas Ruzicka Hello, > > I would like to vote in this discussion, because I strongly disagree with > Fedora related stuff moving out from Pagure (that Fedora owns and controls) > to GitHub, which is

Re: What do you think?

I have already packaged clear linux kernel for fedora,its a copr repo.Please check that out kernel-clear on copr.Its not updated with the recent security patches though. On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 6:38 PM adda ella Hi, > Bazaar Review recently release article[1] about Intel's Clear Linux with > some

Re: Automating package maintainers responsivity check

Yes, this could be a good idea. Might be too small as a gsoc project though. I'd happily take this as i am anyways going to try for gsoc 19 with fedora,this could be a good starting point. A simple dockerized/contenerized python based app could be done as a very simple implementation. On Nov

Re: NeuroFedora review swaps: python-fslpy, python-fsleyes-widgets

I am taking this. On Sat, Nov 3, 2018, 8:20 PM Ankur Sinha Here is another package that needs review. Happy to swap a review for > it too. > > python-duecredit: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768 > > -- > Thanks, > Regards, > > Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" > >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

re. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:48 AM Victor Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > >> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same > approach > > > > TBH I don't really know how that'd

Re: Self Introduction: John Ford

Welcome back john,its always good to have someone with experience. - Manas On Sat, Oct 6, 2018, 7:21 PM John Ford wrote: > Hi, > > My name is John Ford and I'm looking to get back into working on Fedora. > I have been a Fedora user since Version 8, though I've been using Red Hat > since I

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

all this aside,HTML mail format is difficult to qoute and reply on mobile,plain text would be nice. On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:44 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 03 October 2018 at 08:38, Florian

Re: fedpkg clone doesn*t work

Clone as anonymous,fepkg clone -a whatever On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 4:56 PM Martin Gansser wrote: > I tried > > fedpkg clone lollypop > > Cloning into 'lollypop'... > marti...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make

Re: Self Introduction

Still looking for sponsorship as a packager/maintainer. On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Okay, I am happy to be finally joining the effort. > > - Manas > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> I cannot take your review r

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same approach TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current package,would love to learn. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 3:09 AM Victor Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar > w

Re: Self Introduction

Okay, I am happy to be finally joining the effort. - Manas On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > I cannot take your review right now but i just want to say: Welcome! > > Michal > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM Manas Mangaonkar < > manasmangao

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is. - Manas On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Hayden Barnes > wrote: > > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a > third-party dnf repo? > > > > That would

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > >The processes run are listed in the mail on 16 July. The apps are mostly > Firefox with half a dozen tabs or so, Konsole with few tabs, Dolphin etc on > a KDE Plasma desktop. Occasionally postgresql database with a python2.7 > application, but the `perf' traces were taken while these aren't

Re: Orphaning procedure for python-assimulo

pac23 On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > What's your FAS account? > > On 23/08/2018 03:16, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Kindly assign it to me. > > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 23:32 Antonio Trande, > <mailto:ant

Self Introduction

love to give back to the community. My Github <https://github.com/Pac23> - Manas Mangaonkar ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://

Re: Non-responsive maintainer for python-pytz

To work on this does one need to be sponsored ? If no & if the maintainer doesn't repsond i can start work immediately tomorrow. Recently began packaging would love to work on this. On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, 12:23 Joseph D. Wagner, wrote: > It hasn't been updated in almost a year, and it's updates

Re: Orphaning procedure for python-assimulo

Hey, Kindly assign it to me. On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 23:32 Antonio Trande, wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I'm leaving the maintenance of 'python-assimulo' package; if someone > wishes take care of it, please reply here. > > Regards. > -- > --- > Antonio Trande > Fedora Project > mailto 'sagitter at

Re: Orphaning procedure for python-ivi -vxi11 -usbtmc -testify

ed_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package > > On 22/08/2018 07:05, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Please assign them to me,i recently began packaging and looking for more > > experience as i enjoy doing it. > > > &g

Re: Orphaning procedure for python-ivi -vxi11 -usbtmc -testify

Hey, Please assign them to me,i recently began packaging and looking for more experience as i enjoy doing it. - Manas On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 00:19 Antonio Trande, wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I'm orphaning following Python packages on Fedora (and EPEL): > > python-ivi > python-vxi11 >

Re: Seeking New Maintainer for python-html5lib

Id be happy to maintain it, recently began packaging and looking for more experience. On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, 13:33 Joseph D. Wagner, wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584176 > > Current maintainer said: > Praveen Kumar --- Apologies, I >

Re: About to orphan python-pymtp

Hey I know this is a bit late but i can maintain this,let me know if the offer is still valid. On Sat, 4 Aug 2018, 02:00 Ville-Pekka Vainio, wrote: > Hi! > > In light of the recent FTBFS reports, I would like to orphan > python-pymtp, because I haven't used it in a while. > There's one other

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

Hey, incase this has been abandoned,i can take this up.I recently published my first package --> KernelHighperf and would love to work on something else and gain more experience as a packager. On Wed,

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> > >> Available Packages > >> kernel.src4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28 > >> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> It's just a little tricky > installing packages that have the same name, but lower > version numbers than what is in the main Fedora repos. I will update the documentation,thanks. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, 13:56 Samuel Sieb, wrote: > On 07/23/2018 11:53 PM, Manas Mang

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

This was my first repo/package sorry if i messed up somewhere. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, 12:11 Samuel Sieb, wrote: > On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Available Packages > > kernel.src4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28 > > pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora > > This is

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thank you for the information,i'll look into and get back asap. On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, 22:26 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > What additional information would you like to know? >> Like what you were running etc because i didn't notice anything that >> weird on my end.Sorry for the delay have been busy

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> What additional information would you like to know? Like what you were running etc because i didn't notice anything that weird on my end.Sorry for the delay have been busy with college work. On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

t and the new version in a > personal copr to get familiar with it. Very useful resource is the build > order provided by upstream: > https://forum.lxqt.org/t/build-order-release-plan/292 > > Greetings, > Christian > > > On 07/20/2018 07:44 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Yes

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

lly maintaining the live spin. Packaging is the most > important topic. > > Greetings, > Christian > > > On 07/20/2018 04:44 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > I can give this a shot,My name is Manas i am a Computer Engineering > undergrad. I dont know if i have the skil

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

I can give this a shot,My name is Manas i am a Computer Engineering undergrad. I dont know if i have the skills require for this. Can you give some more information regarding the job. I started contributing recently to withing the past month or so,as of today i am the creator and maintainer for

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

No offense but can you kindly rephrase whatever you said.Its kinda difficult to decipher as your sentences seem to contradict. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 20:06 Chris Murphy, wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > The Actual Url > > > > >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Can you give some more details as those would help Investigate the problem better. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 10:38 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar < > manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Actual Url >> <https://c

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thabks On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 12:29 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > On 7/19/18, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Good to here there haven't been any breakages. > > > > I will look into the swapper process issue asap. > > Thanks. > Output from $perf top -F 49 > > 16.19% [

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Good to here there haven't been any breakages. I will look into the swapper process issue asap. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 10:38 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar < > manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Actual Url >> &

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

The Actual Url <https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora/> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > Rpm Generation Done, Sorry for the really l

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Rpm Generation Done, Sorry for the really long delay. Request someone to test it out. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Just a update,Ended up with a somewhat broken kernel that had performance > issues with the lts patches even after lot of tweaking.Appa

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Manas Mangaonkar < manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >The upstream non LTS kernels have had the mitigation for >> >meltdown/spectre longer than LTS and they likely have more robust >> >implementations. All Fedora rele

Re: Test

Roger that ,over and out. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:02 AM, Alain Vigne wrote: > Is someone receiving me ? > > TIA > -- > Alain V. > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> >The upstream non LTS kernels have had the mitigation for > >meltdown/spectre longer than LTS and they likely have more robust > >implementations. All Fedora releases have had fixes for some time. > I meant the clear linux kernel,they seem to have diff kernel bundles and i want to go with

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

For the record,I am going with the kernel Lts given that it has patches for meltdown & spectre. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Manas Mangaonkar <manasmangaon...@gmail.com > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2018, 1:08 p.m. Peter Robinson, <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, 17 May 2018, 1:08 p.m. Peter Robinson, <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > <manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF > >> PATCHES. &g

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF > PATCHES. > > Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec > > You will have the kernel rpm files in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 > > The gotchas are left as an exercise for the reader (if you are a > newbie, there will be lots of them). :-)

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Regards, Manas Mangaonkar Content Manager | Intern ProgrammingHub <https://programminghub.io/>