move their server from the server product
into the cloud?
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
urrently (still?)
owned by halfie.
The list of orphaned packages can be just a snapshot, as that's in
continuous flux. It's totally non obvious, why a package was orphaned
(by accident, because of upstream is dead, lack of time, ...)
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
patch
as well, so that we'll have sooner or later
2-3 Django versions installable in parallel.
Best,
Matthias
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
nd for any package descriptions, patches etc.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
could be executed in a different phase, e.g before acutally
pushing to a repo. Separating from build would have another benefit:
being able to execute tests, e.g when required packages were updated.
That'd require significant changes in our infrastructure and in many
packages, as test suites and
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:28:54PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 01:14 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36:24AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> +1 I still have an application that is slowly moving to 1.5 but
> >> not there yet a
fy all the packages; that
shouldn't be a big problem at all.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
a
python-django-1.5 version.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
django16, you'd still have the older Django installed, which
will produce a conflict. Thus the upgrade will fail.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2014 08:19 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Just to bring this thread back to life, we're getting to a point
> where support for Django 1.6 is becoming more and more necessary.
> Is there an ETA on its inclusion in Rawhide or COPR?
>
Whah,
t makes sense to follow upstream here. The process is documented
here[1]. I'd inform the cloud WG, because they might be interested ;-)
Matthias
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
. (tbd)
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 01/27/2014 09:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> I would have happily reviewed the package but I've been swamped for a
> few weeks, and I didn't know how to handle the takeover.
>
> Also as Christopher mentioned, I'm not a sponsor, so I can't approve
> the submission (I'm aware of that). I've st
On 01/26/2014 09:09 AM, Kenjiro Nakayama wrote:
> Hi, List
>
> Can anyone swap review or take it as sponsor?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063
>
Kenjiro,
in order to get a package approved, you must be the reporter of a review
request. When looking for a sponsor, it
On 01/21/2014 05:22 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
>> [1]
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizon.git/tree/
>> openstack-dashboard.conf
>> [2]
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizon.git/tree/
>> openstack-dashboard-httpd-2.4.conf
>> [3]
>> http://pkgs.fed
On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long time, I'm a
> complete novice to Django. I've just completed my first app (using the
> built-in development server) and now want to get it packaged. Thus far
> I've followed my norma
On 01/12/2014 10:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Some thoughts:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html
> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
>
> There is a growing number of
On 12/12/2013 09:15 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> How is a new user or a GUI-only person
>
> Well, you were talking about someone who had just used rpm -qf, so in
> that context rpm -qi made a lot of sense.
Yes, you're right, in that context, it makes sense.
> For example: https://apps.fedorapro
On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> The idea behind is:
>>
>> you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
>> and will get a package name, not necessarily the source
>&
On 12/11/2013 09:19 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>>
>>>> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
>>>&g
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
>> don't
>> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
>> feel
>> free to note them at:
>
> Just a heads-up, christmas holidays are
On 11/25/2013 06:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>
>>
>> This is kind of why I keep coming back to: "Why do we have
>> python-django at all?" I don't really see any reason why we shouldn't
>> kill off the python-django package and just carry
Hey,
recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6,
the corresponding bug is [1].
As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful,
at least
- python-django-openstack-auth
- openstack-dashboard
will break, and won't even build any more (because they a
On 11/13/2013 02:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
> don't
> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
> feel
> free to note them at:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infr
On 11/10/2013 06:48 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to become a co-maintainer on at least one package (and
> likely more in the near future), and I see one of the steps is an
> introduction to the list, so here goes:
>
> I was recently hired by Red Hat to work on the OpenStack project,
On 10/28/2013 09:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28:01AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> * Tue Jun 07 2011 Roman Rakus <…> - 4.2.10-3
>>> - Added $HOME/.local/bin to PATH in .bash_profile (#699812)
>> An invisible directory in everyone's PATH. That's rather unfortunate.
>
r the process to foster a
> sense of collaboration and community.
Exactly what I meant! You'll learn a LOT when looking at other people's
contributions, especially when forced to thing about it.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
IF you're NOT in packager group yet.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
lists, how to get sponsored. Just waiting might be a solution, but
probably not the fastest one.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
priorities/costs, I filed an RFE bug some time ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967798
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
en looking through your bugzilla request, it
looks like you already have found your sponsor.
In general, reviewing other's packages, even when doing non-official
reviews is a good way to find a sponsor.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
because even ryu's home page describes itself as software
defined networking framework.
The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 14/06/13 10:06, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I've noticed this bug many days ago. Is it related to this version?
>
I assume you filed a bug, right?
Please don't spam 3! mailing lists, one list should be sufficient; bonus
points for including your bz#.
--
Matthias Runge
--
de
s email, it's not yet arrived
> in updates-testing. This is the problem. And I want to avoid a download
> for a lot of single pkg's which is a painful thing.
if you do
yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
then you'd get just that specific update only w
res: openstack-swift = 1.8.0
>
> doesn't get them.
>
>
It can't get it, since
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5046/openstack-swift-1.8.0-2.fc19
is still in testing.
Best regards,
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ld anybody expect to set up a development system without networking
connection? I don't.
Given that, I propose, to remove the development related stuff from the
DVD, knowing that I need to fetch that stuff later from the net.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
tion doesn't make it better.
As a side note, his first name is Harald, calling a person by his last
name is even more devaluating (at least for me).
Thanks,
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1013096
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
mate-backgrounds.noarch
Why can't mate use the default backgrounds? If it can, shouldn't we drop
additional backgrounds and themes?
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
fedora.ks?h=f19&id=bdd2e5cd074f6ad81deafc44ce373efc450d16a6
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> There are many review requests here.
>
> Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
>
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing
other packages yourself.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
O you cannot ban/deprecate a package from the distro, if there's
still a packager/contributor to the package. Also you can not force
somebody to drop a package.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
think, python-django14 should
Obsoletes: python-django < 1.5
and since the packages are conflicting, we can avoid Conflicts:
Right?
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBA
collection maintainers:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'd love not to do this, but for compat reasons, we need to keep those
versioned names for a limited time.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
: python-django
to
Requires: python-django14
In a week, I will upgrade python-django to Django-1.5.1, in the mean
time, I'll file bugs against packages including patches.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
tthias
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916676
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/django15
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/28/2013 12:58 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a build to
> rawhide, but I assume, that will break many dependent packages.
>
> The plan is, to delay the push, until other packages are fixed, o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2013 08:41 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> But still, currently, we're carrying provides like this: Provides:
> django = %{version}-%{release} Provides: Django =
> %{version}-%{release} and also provide python-django
gt; system to decide which one gets /usr/bin/django-admin. That's
> probably a good question for packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
Will do so.
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enig
t Django-1.6? So I'd prefer to have python-django as moving
target and fix the release by appending the version.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2013 02:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu 28 Feb 2013 06:58:36 AM EST, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> Dear list,
>
>> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a
>> build to rawhide, but I
o try, it should install
cleanly e.g. on Fedora 18.
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3880/5063880/python-django-1.5-1.fc19.noarch.rpm
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/27/2013 05:08 PM, Karel Klic wrote:
> python-functest -- Functional test framework
> python-mozbase -- The Mozilla suite of Python utilities
> python-windmill -- A web application testing framework
Taken. Co-maintainers welcome!
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
updated for security issues, all dependent
services need to be restarted. If not, you're still e.g. vulnerable.
That can't be your wish.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
#x27;d take django-mako to retire it. There's also a bug for this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848705
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
f being sponsored by doing
unofficial reviews on other packages, proving your knowledge.
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRADUYAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWXr
r anyone.
Good news guys! I'll give OpenStack a shot.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
nicate/MailingListGuidelines#No_HTML_Mail.2C_Please
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines?rd=Communicate/MailingListGuidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message
Thanks.
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: U
rted out
> and the performance and usability have caught up.
>
Yupp, I stumbled upon the same. Call me old-school, I liked the other
page better, but the newer is definitely more stylish.
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
ckage_Review_Process
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJQtIe5AAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWVY0H90
oes anaconda require much memory when running headless (e.g. when
working on a kickstart file?) If not, we may want to put some energy
into kickstart-creator?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
oking into packaging Unknown Horizons for Fedora as well.
Renich, I suggest, Manuel and you should coordinate, as both of you
might already have put substantial energy in packaging it.
Regards,
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ng like that).
Pear is here just a example, but there are other package systems in
fedora as well: python-pip, I know there's something similar in ruby
(gem?),...
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/14/2012 11:02 AM, Lorenzo Gil Sanchez wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've already submitted two of them:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866130
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864464
and talked to Matthias Runge to help me with sponsorship.
I hope I can give some
e EPEL branches for:
v8 -- JavaScript Engine
if the Fedora V8 maintainers and uninterested in them.
-T.C.
Currently, I'm interested in those packages for the same reason.
Username: mrunge
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
http://nodejs.tchol.org/ you mean?
Tom
No, http-parser fails to build. It is required, as node.js bundles that.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e to go through renaming process.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
g to set a focus on another window, just because a sleeve touched
the pad is only annoying and unnecessary. I also use my keyboard far
more often than any mouse/touchpad/trackpoint.
We have seen for or five different preferences: I don't think, we should
change that default.
--
here!
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Martin Gansser schrieb:
>Hi all,
>
>I've just packaged guayadeque - A Audio player and organizer.
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
>
>Descripition : Guayadeque is a music management program designed for
>all music enthusiasts.
>It is Full Featured Linux media player that can
raveit. Both of them
didn't want to take this into light to sort these issues out.
Since, Dan is the feature owner of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop
I think, he should take care not to scare every reviewer and contributor
away; many people left the reviews unfinished a
is incompatible with Django 1.4).
>
> I'll happily review a similarly simple package in return.
>
>
>
Oh, I'm happy, there's a new ReviewBoard version on the horizon.
Could you take a look onto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845922
Thanks
--
Matt
navailable in fedora or security repos.
If you'd like to get security fixes backported, you'll probably want a
supported (i.e. paid) distro, e.g. RHEL or it's free clones Scientific
Linux, or CentOS.
Please note: you will still get (many) updates and should install them
all, but you w
On 07/12/2012 07:08 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote:
django-recaptcha
gnome-rdp
In fact, these package have already been taken by somebody without
announcement here.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
aring about those packages and your work for fedora!
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
t.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/Django_rename
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/11/2012 02:33 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
@devel
May someone take care of this rename and review so that it happens
before f18 branching ?
Regards,
done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839382
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel
tly four days old.
In between, you should improve this situation by reviewing other packages.
Thanks,
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
figuration in fedora is
IMHO left to the user. I think, this configuration snippet should be
dropped somewhere in the wiki as good example how to configure Xorg
The other problem, I see is, that there's no (real) upstream, and esp.
no issue tracker (other than bugzilla).
--
Matthias Runge
something to test
might work but is usually not a good strategy. There are about 700
packages waiting to get reviewed. Just start a few and the chances for
your packages will improve.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 26/04/12 20:57, Matthias Runge wrote:
Something like that works well in learning environments, why it should
work here?
should read:
... why it shouldn't work here?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
omething to check in fas? E.g. "congrats John Doe, this last week you
reviewed two packages, sponsoring one new packager"?
Or to report top 20 "Packagers/Reviewers/Sponsors of the week"?
Something like that works well in learning environments, why it should
work here?
--
to me. It would help in cases where new packagers vanish.
Paul
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rrier is pretty high. There were a few proven
packager requests denied in the past.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
iew process for new packagers results in finding a
potential sponsor. This is some kind of suboptimal for helping people.
(To be clear, this never made a problem for me, but slows down the process.)
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ontend code. No-one has time
to substantially rewrite the oldui partitioning code just for btrfs, so
it's been taken out from the UI entirely just for this release.
Thank you Adam for this explanation! Sounds reasonable, and I'd say, let's
take another round and make it rock so
On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
hat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806463
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
an error:
grubby fatal error; unable to find a suitable template
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
can't really control, how your file system cache is filled.
Although I must say, measuring a the whole effort a few times
consecutively provides more reliable numbers (caution: but no
disk speed measurement).
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
e times larger than memory size to get
around file system caching. I guess, that's still valid.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
easily be fixed.
[1}
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4-beta-1/#backwards-incompatible-changes-in-1-4
I'd support updating to 1.4 in fedora and creating a
python-django14-package for EL6.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
throwing out people.
Ok, agreed, My question was merely academic. Who to contact, if...
I didn't ran into a limitation so far. Ok, once or twice. In total
the system works well. Changing a large number of packages is
surely a corner case.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel m
s
know, how to revert this.
What about: getting more proven packagers?
Make them more prominent, i.e. making it easier to contact
them?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ght way to propose
this change?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
en
packagers, they might jump in in this limited case.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ght
person to patch there. (You might substitute kernel with everything
you want, just to make the picture).
I'm a bit puzzled by quick-and-dirty 'fixes' which may lead to errors
somewhere else.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
nsive process.
>
> Marcela
I'm thinking about how to support Jóhann with a proven packager (or
two). Since it seems not wanted by Fesco, to give him the corresponding
rights to commit his changes directly? This final target (all services
are supported by systemd) seems to be
package
maintainers getting commit rights automatically after a timespan,
right?
What about bug reporter being unable to fix the mentioned bug?
And does the bug-reporter get his right revoked after a time
(automatically?)
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
, so
feel free and take any other ;-)
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
101 - 200 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
