I can also understand your choice and thank you for your many years in
keeping it going.
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 8:51 AM Jan Staněk wrote:
> As the downstream maintainer of NodeJS, I want to express both thanks
> and deep understanding of your situation. Especially with the
> de-modularization
in
support of that.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:36 AM Michael Dawson wrote:
> When on the vpn it fails quickly with
>
> ⬢[midawson@toolbox nodejs]$ git checkout stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0
> branch 'stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0' set up to track
> 'origin/stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.9.0'.
>
:
CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self-signed
certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1006)')))
⬢[midawson@toolbox nodejs]$
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:18 AM Michael Dawson wrote:
> When I ran yesterday it seemed to hang and I think from the error message
> I see today after l
the difference was, but I'll try without it as well
and see if I end up with usable rpms
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:04 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:48 PM Michael Dawson
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to the help and suggestions so far. I've go
Thanks to the help and suggestions so far. I've gotten farther based on the
suggestion to use toolbox. Using the following I can get further
toolbox create -i quay.io/rhel-devel-tools/rhel-developer-toolbox:latest
toolbox enter rhel-developer-toolbox-latest
git clone
I'm trying to build https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs using
centpkg but am running into errors.
I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild
--with=bundled in the directory where I've cloned the
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs
To close out on this thread the WASM Sig has been set up and you can join the
wasm-...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/wasm-sig.lists.fedoraproject.org/
Zuzana has also set up an associated Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/WASM
And even at risk of sending this twice to some of you, reminder that we
have an initial meeting planned for Monday the 23rd as outlined in:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JO2YYDQPC65EMQVO6UCHDV4SAKQNSGKV/
Just a reminder that we are hoping to
Just a reminder that we are hoping to have an initial meeting Jan 23 at 4pm UTC
(9am Pacific, 11am ET, 5pm CET). We picked 11 ET as an attempt to span the
timezones from Europe and NA.
I've not seen any yes/no in terms of the time working so we'll go ahead with
the proposed time.
Here as link
It's the new year and we are going to get things going.
Zuzana is going to set up a Wiki page where we can track info and we are going
to setup an initial meeting to get together to discuss how we get started.
The proposed initial agenda is:
- Communication channels
- Mailing list
-
Great to see all the interest so far. Will continue to point people to this
thread to collect those who are interested in being involved and will look to
get the SIG rolling early in the new year.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks to everybody who has responded so far, will be waiting for more
responses as I know many people have been out this week.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 8:03 PM Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Michael,
>
>
> On 2022-11-19 05:41, Michael Dawson wrote:
> > As Web Assembly (WASM) gains
As Web Assembly (WASM) gains momentum we’d like to create a SIG as a place to
collaborate to ensure that Fedora is a great platform to both build and run
WASM workloads. This includes looking at the toolchains needed to build WASM as
a target and the runtimes needed to run WASM. It will provide
13 matches
Mail list logo
