On 29. 05. 24 13:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 05. 24 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
GenericError: srpm
) (expected ocaml-5.2.0-1.fc41.src.rpm)
I have just now kicked off another build in case this was a one-off,
but anyone got ideas about this?
RPM 4.20 regression. Fix is being cooked at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/c/9042b409567e8479d6ddafc26e33badbe3bb3457?branch=rawhide
--
Miro Hrončok
raged to use the
-l flag when the %license file is not manually listed in %files to avoid
accidentally losing the file in a future version. When the %license file is
manually listed in %files, packagers can use the -L flag to ensure future
compatibility in case the -l behavior eventually becomes
) (@sgallagh:fedora.im,
20:01:08)
I am a tad sad that this was approved by FESCo without being first discussed
with the wider community.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
be added to fedora-obsolete-packages so that
it is - if installed - removed on upgrade to Fedora 41?
If a specific replacement exists (plocate), I think it should Obsolete it
explicitly.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel
this without
knowing who to send it to).
I'm afraid the badge claim link is expired now:
"""
410 Gone
This resource is no longer available. No forwarding address is given.
That invitation is expired.
"""
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phon
://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/elections-voting-is-now-open/
<https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/elections-voting-is-now-open/>
Hello, there is a "None None" candidate to the EPEL Steering Committee.
The link leads to Troy Dawson (tdawson) interview.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phon
for the maintainers.
The component name does not matter to the "normal" users. It only matters to
experienced packagers, but those should be capable of dealing with that.
(The Python 3 vs Python thing obviously is horrible, and nobody should ever do
anything like that again.)
--
Mi
On 15. 05. 24 10:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 14. 05. 24 v 18:35 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 14. 05. 24 16:02, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 20:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 13. 05. 24 15:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And TBH, for me as a Fedora used with no special interest in Python
On 14. 05. 24 16:02, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 20:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 13. 05. 24 15:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And TBH, for me as a Fedora used with no special interest in Python, the
current Python versioning sucks hard. How am I supposed to tell what is the
current version
Hi,
When is Fedora 38 going EOL?
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html says today
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html say next week
Which one is correct?
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 10. 05. 24 22:45, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:29 dop. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
So we can now have packages with uppercase AND/ORs and packages with
lowercase and/ors and we can no longer quickly recognize SPDX expression by
observing uppercase AND/ORs?
That does not sound
require changes. Such
changes could land gradually as needed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On 13. 05. 24 20:04, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
Miro Hrončok writes:
It first showed up in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.13/pull-request/58
The Ci has all the logs, e.g.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8452/117468452/build.log
Thanks
`? Despite I have spent with Fedora more then a decade,
answering such simple question is not trivial for me.
I guess that for the user, the easiest way is to look at the RPMs. Users barely
look into our repositories.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
revisit if this exception is needed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
one has any feedback on these ideas we'd like to hear it and are happy to
discuss
these more.
+100
Any chance this gets partially implemented in older Fedoras?
I'd appreciate llvm18 and clang18 in Fedora 39 (for Python 3.13 experimental
JIT).
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.13/Tools/jit/README
, and libvirt. Those would newly depend on a new
package where we move the script to.
(The logistic challenge there will be side-tag rebuilding all those
after a systemtap subrpm split.)
I don't understand why that would be necessary. Could you please explain why do
you believe it would?
--
Miro Hrončok
ted when using -O0 unless -Wno-cpp is
also used.
The debug build is -O0 -Wno-cpp. The optimized build is -O3.
annocheck's source code even mention that -O2 might be needed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing l
On 10. 05. 24 15:58, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On 2024-05-10 06:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
when we build Python 3.13 with -O3
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_built_with_gcc_O3
I see the following annocheck problem:
Hardened: /usr/bin/python3.13: MAYB: test: fortify, reason
:
-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -O3
Is -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 not comaptible with -O3? Do I need to do somethign about
this?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
with uppercase AND/ORs and packages with lowercase
and/ors and we can no longer quickly recognize SPDX expression by observing
uppercase AND/ORs?
That does not sound like improvement to me :/
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
essary changes for 1.30+ only in the
specfile for 1.30+ in new Fedora(s), keep the specfile as it was with 1.29 in
the older Fedoras you still need to support.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
to be updated and/or removed.)
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On 18. 04. 24 1:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 18. 04. 24 0:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 04. 24 23:10, Markus Falb wrote:
I wonder if there is a way to reflect that in the spec file
something like:
...snip
Requires: expat >= 2.6.0
snap...
Yes, we need to do that. I'm on it.
ht
On 18. 04. 24 0:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 04. 24 23:10, Markus Falb wrote:
I wonder if there is a way to reflect that in the spec file
something like:
...snip
Requires: expat >= 2.6.0
snap...
Yes, we need to do that. I'm on it.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.13/p
ilding.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 17. 04. 24 14:27, Victor Stinner wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Python 3.13 has an experimental JIT compiler:
https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.13.html#experimental-jit-compiler
Enabling it is a configure (hence build-time) option.
How do we handle
On 13. 04. 24 10:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 04. 24 2:33, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
How much larger is Python at -O3 compared to -O2? And other packages?
That is a good question, will measure.
-O2 RPM size:
python3-3.12.2-3.fc41.x86_6432638
python3-libs-3.12.2-3.fc41
On 13. 04. 24 2:33, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
How much larger is Python at -O3 compared to -O2? And other packages?
That is a good question, will measure.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On 07. 04. 24 17:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Note that it produces incorrect results if the Release value is not numerical
(or if it is a greater number than count of the commits since last bump). It
will happily convert release 0.1 to 3, 29.20130501hg26242d0aa7b8 to 30 or even
release 500 to 10
opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/simarrange/pull-request/3 -- it includes the
SPDX conversion.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
in EPEL when the older one
EOLs, but it also allows those with dependencies that are not qualified
for the latest Django to swap to the LTS in Fedora
I saw this and I meant to ask: Why `python-django-impl`? Why not `Conflicts:
pytohn3dist(django)`?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC
in EPEL when the older one
EOLs, but it also allows those with dependencies that are not qualified
for the latest Django to swap to the LTS in Fedora
I saw this and I meant to ask: Why `python-django-impl`? Why not `Conflicts:
pytohn3dist(django)`?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC
On 11. 04. 24 15:05, Sandro wrote:
On 11-04-2024 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 04. 24 11:55, Sandro wrote:
While I ponder those thoughts some more, moving forward in either direction,
the next step would be writing a change proposal?
I'd start by:
Packaging pynose without hacks (only
-infos).
That way, pro-active packagers can switch already.
And the change proposal can then describe what will be *added* to pynose,
rather than describing the approach from scratch.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python
-installable.
Opinions?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On 10. 04. 24 17:30, Sandro wrote:
On 10-04-2024 12:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 04. 24 19:30, Sandro wrote:
Therefore, I'm thinking of introducing pynose as a drop in replacement of
deprecated nose. Pynose uses the same namespace as nose, but provides
python3dist(pynose). Thus adding
.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
#skipping-changelog-entries
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
.
E.g.:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/printrun/pull-request/8
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy3.10/pull-request/15#comment-179619
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poly2tri/pull-request/2 + fixup commit on
top https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poly2tri/c/053f90
--
Miro Hrončok
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp/pull-request/1
--
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx-GLCanvas` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/3
--
___
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default/pull-request/1
--
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Growl-GNTP` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Growl-GNTP/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess/pull-request/2
--
ard.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.
On 27. 03. 24 16:03, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.c
-03-07
It was closed after it was fixed. The update was stuck at beta freeze and
nobody associated the FTI bugzilla with it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
package provides
python3.12. So when you do:
requires:
- python3.12
It just works.
I believe nodejs should provide nodejs20, the same way.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Hello,
I opened this ticket 1+ month ago:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11947
tl;dr RHEL modular python39-pip-wheel and python39-setuptools-wheel packages
are available in epel8 Koji buildroot but not in epel8-next Koji buildroot.
Can somebody please help to fix this?
Thanks,
--
Miro
On 18. 03. 24 17:07, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I wonder why these packages rely in pkg-config and don't just install
to `%{bash_completions_dir}`?
Because they either predate the macro or the thing was copied from another
package that predates it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC
directory).
The possible packages which may need fixing are:
...
13 python-django/rawhide/python-django.spec bashcompdir=$(pkg-config
--variable=completionsdir bash-completion)
I opened https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django/pull-request/37 5
days ago.
--
Miro Hronč
On 08. 03. 24 11:43, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Miro Hrončok:
On my system, I have postgresql16 and postgresql16-plugin installed
and I want to "upgrade" to postgresql20*.
Using my distribution package manager, I would want to run something like:
dnf swap postgresql16 postgresql2
On 02. 03. 24 23:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:16:02PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 03. 24 11:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:00:20AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:49:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
We
ring: You are not allowed to modify this project
This seems like https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/505
The package is retired in dist-git:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxslxwriter/commits/rawhide
The error is for monitoring only.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +4
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40
On 21. 02. 24 17:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40
a package maintainer to "guide" the co-dependent
swap case?
I was thinking something like:
postgresql20-plugin:
Obsoletes: (postgresql-any-plugin if postgresql-any != 20)
However that is not possible in RPM, "No rich dependencies allowed for this
type: Obsoletes".
Is there
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40
/var/cache/dnf/fedora-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/bash-5.2.26-3.fc40.x86_64.rpm) from repo "fedora" has failed: Import of the key didn't help, wrong key?
I've already done a --scrub=all a few times to no avail.
Do you have distribution-gpg-keys 1.101 installed?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phon
roject#_28
The preferred (and I would say the most natural way) to pass options to pytest
is to pass them to %pytest directly, e.g.:
%pytest -m "not network"
However, in case the options are long, manipulating PYTEST_ADDOPTS is also an
option, as shown in scipy.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phon
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/13
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
-cauldron...
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 3 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 3 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 4 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 4 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
changes, the fedora bugzilla contact needs to be changed as well.
I've just done that.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx` that you
are following:
``
Remove unneeded complexity of the gtk requires hack
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/3
--
___
.src
thonny-0:4.1.4-1.fc40.noarch
thonny-0:4.1.4-1.fc40.src
vcs-diff-lint-0:4-3.fc39.noarch
vim-syntastic-python-0:3.10.0-21.fc39.noarch
xr-hardware-0:1.1.0-1.fc40.src
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-devel mailing list
.src
thonny-0:4.1.4-1.fc40.noarch
thonny-0:4.1.4-1.fc40.src
vcs-diff-lint-0:4-3.fc39.noarch
vim-syntastic-python-0:3.10.0-21.fc39.noarch
xr-hardware-0:1.1.0-1.fc40.src
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/13
--
___
perl-devel
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx-GLCanvas`
that you are following:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/3
--
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp` that you are following:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp/pull-request/1
--
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Growl-GNTP`
that you are following:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Growl-GNTP/pull-request/1
--
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default` that you are following:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default/pull-request/1
--
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess` that you are following:
``
Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess/pull-request/2
--
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 5 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
he project.
- The user uses -core to build and install it.
(Obviously a developer is free to just use -core as well, if they like it. Many
upstream projects use flit-core only.)
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel ma
he project.
- The user uses -core to build and install it.
(Obviously a developer is free to just use -core as well, if they like it. Many
upstream projects use flit-core only.)
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-dev
.fc39.src
python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src
The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with that
if you are interested).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
.fc39.src
python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src
The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with that
if you are interested).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
ee PRs (probably
not possible via a bookmarked URL but if that is the only blocker for your
workflow, open an issue).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On 24. 01. 24 19:00, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 24.01.24 um 17:38 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required
On 24. 01. 24 17:50, Michel Lind wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
[snip]
golang
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 5 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
?
There is an ongoing outage of FAS, see https://status.fedoraproject.org/
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On 22. 01. 24 20:20, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 2:11 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
In the meantime, if we
otherwise disabled free-access buildroot overrides, this would
definitely be grounds for granting an exception.
How would that work? Would I ask FESCo every time I need
On 22. 01. 24 20:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 01. 24 19:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am unaware of any remaining use cases for buildroot overrides that
are not covered by side tags. If you know of any, please speak up.
Every time
almost 3 years ago.
It works in CentOS Stream, but not in Fedora.
Without that, I sometimes need to create a buildroot override to be able to
test the the second package change before merging it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix FTBFS with GCC 14
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/12
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following:
``
Fix FTBFS with GCC 14
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/12
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
reported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2259285
However, is anything else impacted?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
the tests. It seems I cannot cancel the build from the mass rebuild [1].
Can some one cancel the build for me? I think the timeout is quite late, and I
do not want a stuck build waste all the compute time ...
Done.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
+cache_memory-0:1.98.0-3.fc40.x86_64
matrix-synapse-0:1.98.0-3.fc40.src
python-attrs-0:23.1.0-4.fc39.src
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
at the CLI is quite helpful when there is not a
viable action in the web UI. I run:
bodhi updates request FEDORA-2024-287a88fffd unpush
And it worked.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On 10. 01. 24 22:16, Michel Lind wrote:
Hi Miro,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I recently took python-mistune in Fedora.
I am not interested in maintaining it in EPEL.
It is branched for epel7, epel8 and epel9.
@epel-packagers-sig is a collaborator
1 - 100 of 4715 matches
Mail list logo
