-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/23/2015 01:38 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi Nathan, Hi Mark, Hi team,
>
> as I know, we've decided to make me "gatekeeper" of QE team for
> managing lib389 and DS git repos.
>
> Can you please update the status of this situation?
>
>
On 09/12/2014 12:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47892/0001-Ticket-47892-coverity-defects-found-in-1.3.3.1.patch
ACK.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
On 04/03/2014 08:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47492/0001-Ticket-47492-PassSync-removes-User-must-change-passw.3.patch
Ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47752
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47752/0001-Ticket-47752-Don-t-add-unhashed-password-mod-if-we-d.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 01/16/2014 03:14 PM, Deas, Jim wrote:
Rich,
Thanks. I actually did have the address of operator on the code. Both
the init and config are defining only a couple of specific functions
(start_fn, pre_results_fn,pre_abandon_fn) one function defined for each.
The one I am testing is
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47525/0001-Ticket-47525-Don-t-modify-preop-entry-in-memberOf-co.patch
The previous fix for this issue was causing a crash in one of the
in-tree tests. This patch addresses the crash.
--
389-devel mailing
On 12/12/2013 04:08 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47525/0001-Ticket-47525-Don-t-modify-preop-entry-in-memberOf-co.patch
The previous fix for this issue was causing a crash in one of the
in-tree tests
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47565
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47565/0001-Ticket-47565-Content-Sync-update-file-needs-extensib.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
I just pushed the following patch under the trivial fix rule to
address these warnings. This should make the Jenkins jobs green again.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47569/0001-Ticket-47569-Fix-build-warnings.patch
On 10/22/2013 05:32 PM, nkin...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47513
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47513/0001-Ticket-47513-tmpfiles.d-references-var-lock-when-the.2.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok
with switching to using F19 to run autogen?
Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version
checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum.
Hi,
I made some modifications to our Jenkins jobs which affect the e-mails
that are sent to this list when encountering a build failure. Last
week, I had changed the e-mails to include the entire build logs for
failed builds as a convenience (no need to go to the Jenkins URL to see
why the
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47539
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47539/0001-Ticket-47539-Disabling-DNA-plug-in-throws-error-53.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
, sync_util.c:251,
sync_util.c:544, sync_util.c:608, sync_util.c:682, and result.c:294.
If you address the above issues, I'm OK with you pushing it to the repo.
Thanks,
-NGK
Regards,
Ludwig
On 08/30/2013 05:00 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 08/30/2013 05:06 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hello,
I
FYI - Please ignore these failures, as I manually triggered them to fail
in my Jenkins build environment.
As you can see from these reports, we now have a Jenkins system set up
to perform Continuous Integration builds of the main 389 DS code
(389-ds-base) on Debian 7.1 (Wheezy). These builds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/449
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/449/0001-Ticket-449-Allow-macro-aci-keywords-to-be-case-insen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ACK.
On 08/16/2013 09:55 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47467
These patches improve the Add CRL/CKL Console dialog. Changes were
needed in Admin Server for the security CGI error messages, IDM Console
Framework for the dialog improvements, and Admin Console for the online
help page. I've included screenshots
Hi,
These patches add new UI to the certificate request wizard in Console
that allows the key size and signing algorithms to be selected. It also
improves the defaults if an older Console is used against an Admin
Server with these changes. Changes were required to Admin Server for
the CGI
From 52fb682ceb0b1f03de26b6f9d56a8ee2476d9422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:34:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add git commit hash to developer rpm build names
We need to set the srcdir variable in order for the most recent
git hash
On 04/19/2013 12:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
Hi,
Please review the attached patch that adds the ability for convenient
developer RPM builds. Details are in the patch description.
Note that my patch does not include any changes that will be made
On 04/19/2013 12:51 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 01:21 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
Hi,
Please review the attached patch that adds the ability for
convenient developer RPM builds. Details
just to build the Makefile. More details are in the patch
description.
Thanks,
-NGK
From c996ae334e7a27843549318b3a970c995d58f5b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:10:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Allow rpm builds to be run without configure
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47334
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47334/0001-Ticket-47334-Avoid-quoting-all-settings-in-console.c.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi,
I have set up a nightly development yum repository for 389 Directory
Server builds from master. There are currently builds available for
Fedora 18 (x86_64 and i686). I will work on adding builds for rawhide
(F19) in the near future. New builds are made nightly from the master
branch
On 11/29/2012 06:49 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15.
commit f463f99b22ca0ba0823f18602fc508d477c226b5
Author: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:39:26 2012 -0800
Corrected upstream source URLs
perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec b
commit 416cad8ffeaef19ad084d8b569880cd5422bcf66
Author: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:20:12 2012 -0800
Corrected upstream source URLs
perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec b
ack.
On 08/27/2012 01:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 05/04/2012 10:45 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/04/2012 11:25 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
This came up during extended testing for
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/355
steps:
1) make a ds user and an ad user that are in sync - verify ad changes
go to ds and vice versa
2) move the ad
On 03/07/2012 07:41 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/07/2012 07:53 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
An additional fix is needed for this issue. Your patch fixed the
dna_pre_op() function, but the same issue exists in the
dna_be_txn_pre_op() function. The attached patch takes care of this.
ack
On 03/06/2012 09:30 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ACK
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/02/2012 08:41 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/27/2012 04:11 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/181
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/181/0001-ticket-181-Allow-PAM-passthru-plug-in-to-have-multip.patch
Here is a revised patch that avoids some unnecessary DN normalization as
well as addresses
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/181
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/181/0001-ticket-181-Allow-PAM-passthru-plug-in-to-have-multip.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 01/20/2012 07:02 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/16/2011 08:48 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/16/2011 06:38 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/15/2011 10:29 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/15/2011 01:12 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack to both.
On 10/10/2011 09:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744946
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=527335action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/10/2011 10:08 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Reduce the number of DN normalization
. Replacing SLAPI_TARGET_DN with SLAPI_TARGET_SDN (also its macros,
e.g., SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN and SLAPI_ADD_TARGET_SDN).
I haven't reviewed the entire patch yet, but I am concerned about
changing the APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743966
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=526727action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739172
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=523589action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 09/07/2011 04:29 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/07/2011 05:06 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
The problem comes from the method we use to check if the changelog does
not match the database in replica_check_for_data_reload(). The RUV in
the database contains obsolete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735114
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=521730action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 08/31/2011 04:45 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Nathan Kinder wrote:
Here is a revised patch to address some review comments:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520694action=edit
Do we need to integrate these changes into the IPA winsync plugin?
The changes aren't actually
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722292
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520685action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Here is a revised patch to address some review comments:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520694action=edit
On 08/30/2011 01:31 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722292
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520685action=edit
--
389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732541
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519679action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611438
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519321action=edit
From 820c1c3f018c5fdb8e547740edb58bc1c0a558de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:25:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 611438 - Add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730387
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=518567action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729717
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517697action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728510
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517698action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517299action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713209
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511796action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719056
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511339action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 12:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
This is needed to build in Fedora rawhide
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:54 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/20/2011 06:25 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706258
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=503567action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710377
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=502880action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697961
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=498171action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703530
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=498086action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703304
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497928action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702705
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497407action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497416action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497429action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702150
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497173action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497176action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497179action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700948
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495869action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495871action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=496388action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495832action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700875
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495819action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698428
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493636action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697641
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=492996action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493023action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493032action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693868
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=490067action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691574
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488262action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488270action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488279action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690649
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=487435action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689537
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486665action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486849action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486857action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
A re-run of Coverity uncovered another issue around cov#10709 that was
masked in the first run.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688341
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486862action=edit
On 03/17/2011 03:11 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689952
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486894action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688341
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=485829action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=485851action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486043action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616707
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483545action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622436
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483026action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680558
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=482147action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493424
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480295action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654990
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479987action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480016action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675853
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477699action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583652
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477488action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668950
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477527action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477528action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477529action=edit
On 02/03/2011 12:08 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
I have built the DS on Solaris 10 and I have updated the source to 1.2.7.5
(git).
Can You give me the bugid, so that I can compare the source code related to
this issue?
It was bug 641944. It was fixed after 1.2.7.5 was released.
Thanks,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476468action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Here's a revised patch that exposes if mozldap or openldap is used by
dirsrv.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475007action=edit
On 01/21/2011 11:14 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252249
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252249
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474667action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527912
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474563action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474097action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661102
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472276action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659131
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472121action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
You might want to check if you can just use slapi_is_encoded() instead
of parsing for the storage scheme yourself.
-NGK
On 01/05/2011 06:00 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653007
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=471975action=diff
On 12/14/2010 11:29 PM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
I have the code copied unchanged from winsync-plugin.h where the
slapi_apib_register function is called in test_winsync_plugin_start.
test_winsync_plugin_init does:
slapi_pblock_set( pb, SLAPI_PLUGIN_VERSION, SLAPI_PLUGIN_VERSION_01 ) != 0 ||
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
