Hi,
another subject that can be related
In thread "I think we should stop building i686 packages we're not
shipping" we are alerted for builds for i686 that aren't publish .
Following the tip , I found some packages that we aren't shipped are
needed to allow mock start the buildroot for example
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 10, 2021 11:27:32 AM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via
> devel
> wrote:
> > On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sorry, but didn't we talk about electron and you're pointing
> > > to
> > > vscode?
>
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 17:50 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in
> > Fedora
> > repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle
> > SSO
> >
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 10:12 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG
> (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The
> package could
> be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version from
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 16:52 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> platform orphan, sergiomb 4
> weeks ago
I took it because is needed by libcec , I was already maintainer of the
package
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel
as root
dnf install dpkg
dpkg --force-depends -i slack-desktop-4.21.1-amd64.deb
desktop-file-install ./usr/share/applications/slack.desktop
works for me ,
is a "standalone" package we can check with :
dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile slack-desktop-4.21.1-amd64.deb | tar tf -
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at
as would:
yes is exactly what I'm missing
Thank you
> > %if 0%{?rhel} < 8
>
the logic doesn't fail , but it is trick because includes {?fedora}
> On 11/3/21 14:09, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just notice build in mock or koji this scriptlet [1] on a b
Hi,
I just notice build in mock or koji this scriptlet [1] on a build for
Fedora gives me "is rhel 8 or 9" , what I'm missing ?
Thank you
[1]
%if ! 0%{?rhel} >= 8
echo "is not rhel >= 8"
%else
echo "is rhel 8 or 9"
%endif
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 23:43 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on 2021/11/03 0:59:
> > Please build your packages for F35 in f35-build-side-47231
> >
> > or maybe we should request help of an proven packager
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
Please build your packages for F35 in f35-build-side-47231
or maybe we should request help of an proven packager
Thank you
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:02 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:56 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:4
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:56 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello team,
> >
> > ImageMagick is updated 6.9.12.28 on Rawhide and got side tag as
> > 35-build-side-47231.
>
> Sorry, I am confused. Did you mean to say the update
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 14:50 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 20.10.2021 o 20:09, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > W dniu 29.09.2021 o 10:08, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > > W dniu 28.09.2021 o 09:32, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > > > W dniu 22.09.2021 o 21:07, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > > > > Am
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 23:33 -0700, l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-10-27 10:21 a.m., "Antonio T. sagitter"
> wrote:
> > Use a side-tag
> > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
> > ),
> > please.
>
> Done.
> '''
> Side
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:42 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I would like to let you know ImageMagick-6.9.12-26 recently landed
> upstream.
Hello , when you update from 6.9.11 to 6.9.12, we need rebuild all
depended packages because we got one soname bump and packages won't
Hi, I remember a few years ago an imageMagick upgrade , we made one
compat-ImageMagick693 [1] and after a few days the packages was not
needed anymore .
I propose do the same , do one compat-ImageMagick6.9.12 and after
upgrade ImageMagick to 7 ...
[1]
Hi Luya
I'm sending this email to packaging Mailing List ...
I'm also facing problems with some fonts packages,
see this error [3].
How I convert %_font_pkg ? from
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/lpf-mscore-fonts.git/tree/mscore-fonts.spec.in
Thank you .
[3]
warning: This package
On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 15:22 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
I asked this in another thread, but maybe this is related to [1]? How
do we disable just link-time parallelism?
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/bc8fa85e907d4b2b88760da8d23c9e17663c44fa?branch=rawhide
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 06:39 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37:
> > On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet <
> > fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote:
> > > Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in
> > > stable
> > > branches.
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 10:34 +0200, Casper wrote:
> Happy to read this :)
>
> Congrats, man :)
>
> I will do soon an f33 - f34 - f35 journey
F33 -> F35 should work (update) directly
> Jiri Vanek a écrit :
> > Hello good people!
> >
> > I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 12:53 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now,
> we
> build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> This seems like a waste of resources and time.
>
> I know it's somewhat complicated
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_provides_for_importable_modules
the example doesn't provides %py_provides macro
also I don't find mentions how replacing of %python_provide
%py_provides
Thank you
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see ccache for epel 7 here
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ccache
> > , but is not availabl
Hi,
I see ccache for epel 7 here https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ccache
, but is not available in repos ... why ?
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 14:37 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:50 PM Matthew Miller <
> mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:09:08PM +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what's the best solution, but I guess the number one
> > > reason
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 20:43 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Would it be possible to get BuildRequires: %{py3_dist NAME} working
> on
> EPEL7? At first I thought it was sufficient for epel-rpm-macros to
> require python3-rpm-macros, but now I think we may need to override
> the
> definition of
On Mon, 2021-10-04 at 23:08 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:21 PM Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>
> > I was going to ask people if they
> > were interested in them but I decided to straight up orphan them so
> > they#ll can go through the usual garbage collection process
On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 14:57 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm not familiar with packaging stuff like this so could use some
> pointers:
>
> https://github.com/nwjs/nw.js
>
> This is actually a prereq for another application I'd like to get in
> Fedora.
you can try use nodejs-packaging-bundler
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 20:10 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that the %_host macro is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux-
> gnu on
> the arm builders. I believe this is coming from the mockhost config
> option in kojid.
>
> In /usr/lib/rpm/macros %_host is defined as
On Mon, 2021-09-20 at 22:13 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Jonathan Schleifer kirjoitti 20.9.2021 klo 19.16:
> > Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> >
> > > 0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter
> > > 1
> > > weeks ago
> >
> > Also, how is the flatpak
On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 20:08 +0100, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 23:12, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> > He needs epel-rpm-macros which provides
> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.epel-rpm-macros that has the
> > %ldconfig_scriptlets defined.
> >
>
>
> Thanks a lot!! This resolves
On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 08:29 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 3:19 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-09-18 12:54 p.m., Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2021-09-18 at 14:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > >
On Sat, 2021-09-18 at 14:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> kernel-headers
>
> x86_64 5.15.0-
> 0.rc1.git0.1.fc36
> @rawhide
>
>
On Fri, 2021-09-17 at 12:35 +0100, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A friend of mine is rebuilding an EPEL package (namely llvm9.0) from
> source for CentOS 7 on aarch64. The aarch64 build is not in the EPEL
> repo, probably because RHEL7 for aarch64 is out of support.
>
> WIth an unmodified
Hi,
In practice, after bug [1] I decided rollback update on epel 7 with one
epoch bump [2]. Now after one year and half and after testing, we know
if we removing one line it works, so I want rollback the rollback and
update debmirror on epel7 to support Ubuntu 20.04 ...
the question is, can I
oops, I wanted to send the previous message just to the author ,
message can be ignored
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Olá , convido-te para te juntatres ao matrix chat
> ( https://app.element.io/#/room/#fedora-br:libera.chat
>
> #fedora-br
Olá , convido-te para te juntatres ao matrix chat
( https://app.element.io/#/room/#fedora-br:libera.chat
#fedora-br no libera.chat
On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 22:37 -0300, Miguel R. Araújo wrote:
> I still need someone to sponsor me into the packager group to be able
> to maintain these packages.
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:28 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 09. 21 12:16, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > While python 3.10 is not officially released Expected: 3.10.0 final:
> > Monday,
> > 2021-10-04 ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0619/
> > <https://ww
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 11:44 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anybody know how to contact jpokorny and rdieter? They are not
> responding to bugzillas regarding the compatibility of their packages
> with Python 3.10.
>
> Nonresponsive maintainer bug for jpokorny:
>
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 23:29 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> > 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> > Debian/Ubuntu.
> > I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 07:23 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We seem to have missed an announcement about the soname bump in gtest
> from 1.10.0 to 1.11.0:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtest/c/b290e7d10ed5fd24b4e1e45f46ad4c15848c18a5?branch=rawhide
>
> We ran into this because
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> Debian/Ubuntu.
> I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
> versions however there are several alternatives.
> One which is already in the repos is
Hi,
soundtouch was update from 2.1.2 to 2.3.0 on rawhide and now use cmake
as build system , is not a soname bump , because we still provide
libSoundTouch.so.2 , but I advice rebuild the dependent packages [1].
If no problems reported , soundtouch-2.3.0 should go to F35 too .
Best regards,
we are talking about it here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630#c27
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
> I guess this is a bug but on
> https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan there are
> "important" - or at least very used - packages affected
Hi,
I'm seeing the same problem, for a quick fix, we need update
/etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl line 12 with
config_opts['releasever'] = '36', as reference [1] ...
We need a new mock-core-configs package with configurations for "Fedora
35 branched" some work in progress here [2]
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 14:06 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I filed a bugzilla request 2021-04-18 (almost 4 month ago) asking for
> the uglify-js package to be updated:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950780
>
Hi,
JFYI and avoid deductions ...
I will update
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 13:26 -0400, Stephen Snow wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 18:44 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Stephen Snow [11/08/2021 12:08] :
> > >
> > > > > Even tried the review route, which is also beset with arbitrary
> > > > > obstacles.
> > > >
> > > Wasn't able to download
On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 12:04 +, linux4mar...@gmx.de wrote:
> I will remove the executable flag with:
> chmod 0644 *.pm
maybe, rpm macro %_fixperms [1], is useful for this case.
[1]
macro is in file /lib/rpm/macros line 794
> Thanks a lot
> Martin
>
--
Sérgio M. B.
Hi,
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 11:48 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> In a week i will compile MUMPS-5.4.0 in Rawhide; this implicates the
> rebuilds of dependent packages:
>
> $ repoquery --whatrequires MUMPS-openmpi-devel --disablerepo=*
> --enablerepo=*-source
>
> Last metadata
Found it is pycodestyle
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 18:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pep8 was retired 2 years
> ago
> , have we any replacement ? for pep8 for example:
>
> pep8 --config pep8.conf fedora-review/java_guideli
Hi,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pep8 was retired 2 years ago
, have we any replacement ? for pep8 for example:
pep8 --config pep8.conf fedora-review/java_guidelines.py
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
python-devel mailing list --
Hi,
[1] apache-ivy is only required by ivy-local from javapackages-tools-
6.0.0~alpha-7.fc35.src.rpm
apache-ivy is a FTBFS on rawhide
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6387/71866387/build.log
I'd bring back to Fedora fedora-review-plugin-java
Review Request:
/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you
[3]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_responsibilities/
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 21:29 +0100, Joan Moreau wrote:
> In practical terms, how to get a "sponsor" ?
>
>
> On 2021-06-29 11:13, Sérgio Basto w
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 15:38 -0400, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:24 AM Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
> >
> > I always use `fedpkg import` and this command has `--offline` option,
> > which populates the `sources` file without uploading the archives to
> > the
> > look-a-side cache.
>
>
Hi,
Sorry, this may be a little Off-topic but we notice that lame package
from RHEL 8 (1) is not shipping lame package with binaries and in this
case lame-devel is provided along with lame-libs , can we apply the
same rules ? is completely a different situation ?
(1)
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 22:34 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Joan Moreau via devel [26/06/2021 19:36] :
> >
> > What is next ?
>
> The answer is the same one you were given two months ago.
>
> You need to seek out a sponsor:
>
>
pt)'
> > rubygem-actioncable-0:6.1.3.2-1.fc35.src
> > rubygem-coffee-rails-0:5.0.0-1.fc34.src
> > rubygem-sprockets-0:4.0.2-2.fc34.src
> > rubygem-tilt-0:2.0.10-5.fc35.src
> >
> > So these would need some testing.
> >
> >
> > Dne 21. 06. 2
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 01:03 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden kirjoitti 21.6.2021 klo 14.50:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > > I am a bit confused about this discussion. My fedpkg does not care
> > > about the 'sources' file or the
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 16:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 17:05 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > coffee-script package was recently retired due to being orphaned and
> > FTBFS for some while. Since there are some other packages depen
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 17:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails
> with:
>
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-8=x86_64
is working for me
mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --install kernel-headers also works
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 10:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 06. 21 9:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I think we should just disable this particular bot until it fixed.
> > We should also clarify/update the Update Guidelines so that
> > undesirable
> > updates are disallowed, no
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 11:45 -0400, Alex Macdonald wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am writing to let everyone know that JDK Mission Control (JMC) and
> it’s dependencies will be orphaned in Fedora by the end of tomorrow
> (June 18th). This encompasses packages owned by both myself (almac)
> and jkang,
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 17:05 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> coffee-script package was recently retired due to being orphaned and
> FTBFS for some while. Since there are some other packages depending on
> it, I have decided to unretire it [1]. I have working package ready (at
> least to the
On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 18:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Sorry, didn't see this when it first came through.
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:18 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > I propose, for F36, the retire of Gconf2 (1)
> >
> > dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' \
> > -
If your native language is portuguese, you might like to participate in
the room #fedora-br on IRC
Fedora Brazil | Telegram https://t.me/fedora_br
On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 01:20 +0100, Tiago d'Almeida wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> I'm a newbie in these lists, but I have been using the Fedora OS
Hi,
In resume you are rindolf and don't have access to fedora anymore ? and
you want that someone update it for you ?
I can happily do that, if you give me permissions in fortune-mod , as
you know my fas name is sergiomb , can you acess to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fortune-mod via web ?
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 10:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 00:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 16:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 00:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 16:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 12:19 +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
> > &g
On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 16:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 12:19 +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
> > > On 6/4/21 12:30 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > > > I have packages that depen
On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 12:19 +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
> On 6/4/21 12:30 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > I have packages that depend directly on the following, so I am
> > willing
> > to adopt them if nobody more competent shows up (although there is no
> > point in taking ant-contrib if ant is
On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 20:36 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:32 PM Jerry James
> wrote:
> >
> > I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A
> > depressingly large chunk of my packages are going to become
> > unbuildable on Monday when a bunch of
On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 07:34 -0400, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:56 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 15:30 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > > I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A
> > > depressingly large chu
On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 15:30 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A
> depressingly large chunk of my packages are going to become
> unbuildable on Monday when a bunch of orphaned Java packages are
> retired. I think a lot of us are going to be
On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 08:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, May 31 2021 at 11:18:25 AM +0100, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > I propose, for F36, the retire of Gconf2 (1)
>
> Good idea. I think we can go ahead and do it now, though, unless
> somebody plans to try to
On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 09:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:01 PM Michael Catanzaro <
> mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 22 2021 at 09:23:23 AM +1000, Bob Hepple
> > wrote:
> > > I have no idea how significant this might be, but perhaps this
> > > should
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 11:49 +0200, e wrote:
> sounds unintuitive, but he just speaks truth to power:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/352#comment-734630
>
> "I think the GRUB stuff is so esoteric, so conditional and overly
> complicated, that we shouldn't
> explain it.
On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 13:00 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:30:54AM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > fedpkg clone debhelper
> > cd debhelper
> > fedpkg srpm && mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --no-clean --rebuild
> > debhelper-
> > 13
On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 13:00 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:30:54AM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > fedpkg clone debhelper
> > cd debhelper
> > fedpkg srpm && mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --no-clean --rebuild debhelper-
> > 13.3.4-1.fc35.src.rp
Hi,
fedpkg clone debhelper
cd debhelper
fedpkg srpm && mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --no-clean --rebuild debhelper-
13.3.4-1.fc35.src.rpm
I can build the package in _all_ others branches but in epel8 ends with
"Initialization of state variables in list context currently forbidden
at
Hi,
MLT-7 change to cmake IIRC , and move all files to a different
directory , we are trying keep all in same place [1] since, I think we
don't need two versions of MLT (6 and 7)
We need to rebuild synfig and synfigstudio [2].
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mlt/pull-request/3#
[2]
On Sat, 2021-05-22 at 11:57 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:32:25AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:20 AM Stephen John Smoogen <
> > smo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> Here's a scratch build of 1.4.11, but I bet it won't work as many of
mock -r fedora-34-x86_64 --rebuild
lua-resty-luajit2-git.HEAD-0.pgnd_20210513_212639.fc34.src.rpm
also fails in my machine, %forgesetup -z 0 is where it fails, have you a
different or custom /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.forge ?
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 17:43 -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
I've a
product=Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux 8=po4a=CentOS Stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959750
Thanks
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:13 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Since this commit [1] I need po4a >= 0.59 to build dpkg , but [2],
> > po4a
Hi,
Since this commit [1] I need po4a >= 0.59 to build dpkg , but [2],
po4a is in powertools repo [3] , can we do something to update it ?
Thank you.
[1]
https://github.com/guillemj/dpkg/commit/a74a91310260efe55cc986506fe208ae2776a45a
[2]
https://git.centos.org/rpms/po4a/
import
On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 14:45 +, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to retire the original glib, GLib 1 from the GNOME 1 era.
> This is would take out the gtk+ package (GTK 1) along with it. (I'm not
> proposing to remove GTK 2.) GLib 1 has been obsolete for 19 years now,
> since GLib 2
On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:09 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> Hi!
> At the moment the Anaconda installer used by Fedora contains an option
> called "Allow SSH root login with password" on the root password
> configuration screen.
>
> This is how it looks like at the moment, on latest Fedora Rawhide
>
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 09:27 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >Hijacking this thread originally about
> > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271
> > >
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 21:19 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary
> maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of
> them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and
> don't
Hi,
while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired ,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo
raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ?
Or better , when the package is retired by some rules like FTBFS or
RetirePython2 , the
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 09:32 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <
> pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:
> > zoglesby is maintainer of rpms/publican-fedora
> >
> Huh. That still exists? What a throwback!
publican-fedora is not marked as retired on
On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 14:45 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 14:40 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Sérgio Basto [18/04/2021 12:57] :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > $HOME/.local/bin which is not on PATH , $HOME/bin is in PATH, am
> > > I
On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 14:40 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Sérgio Basto [18/04/2021 12:57] :
> > Hi,
> >
> > $HOME/.local/bin which is not on PATH , $HOME/bin is in PATH, am I
> > missing something ?
>
> /etc/skel/.bashrc has contained the following:
>
Hi,
$HOME/.local/bin which is not on PATH , $HOME/bin is in PATH, am I
missing something ?
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 12:58 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:35 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 12:29 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 at 11:57, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 12:29 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 at 11:57, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271#How_T
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271#How_To_Test
As I think this is not trivial we should add to How_To_Test paragraph :
After:
copr mock-config odubaj/autoconf-2.70 fedora-rawhide-x86_64 >
odubaj-autoconf-2.70_fedora-34-x86_64.cfg
mv odubaj-autoconf-2.70_fedora-34-x86_64.cfg
On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 08:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >
> > > Hijacking this thread originally about
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271
> > >
> > > What is the current thinking in Fedora
Hi,
On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
># next time you run any DNF command default modules will be
> enabled again
>
I'd like test it :) , I though this email was a package review request
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 11:18 +, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Czkawka [1] is a program that can be used to find and remove
> duplicate files. It is written in Rust and offers a GTK3 interface.
>
> I looked briefly into
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 17:24 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> during the last winter holidays I've started to write a new flask app
> to
> automatize the new package submission process. The goals of this app
> would be:
>
> - Get rid of manually open and manage Bugzilla
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:47 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I need to lighten my packaging load as I no longer have free cycles
> at $DAYJOB like I used to.
> Here's round one:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qastools
> Desktop toolset for the Linux sound system ALSA.
> * Fully up to date
401 - 500 of 1526 matches
Mail list logo
