Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

2023-08-24 Thread Tom London
BTW, after removing python3-slip, python3-slip-dbus and python3-decorator, both dnf5 and dnf produce no errors On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 6:35 AM Tom London wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:39 AM Nicola Sella wrote: > >> Thanks Mirek, >> >> dnf --releasever=

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

2023-08-24 Thread Tom London
e - package python3-slip-0.6.4-29.fc38.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.11, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package vtk-9.2.5-2.fc38.x86_64 Notice that Problem 3 is different. tom -- Tom London ___

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-02-28 Thread Tom London
belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package fedy-4.0.5-1.fc22.noarch > (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting > packages > or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > ___

fuse, /dev/fuse, systemd, ... ?

2013-08-03 Thread Tom London
t ro LANG=en_US.UTF-8 [root@tlondon ~]# Something to BZ or all part of the plan tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16

2012-12-17 Thread Tom London
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London wrote: >> >> >> > >> > I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including >> > xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logg

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16

2012-12-16 Thread Tom London
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Tom London wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> >> and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the >> 2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases. >> >> -Ilyes >> >> >> O

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16

2012-12-16 Thread Tom London
> >>> > > I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would >>> > you want us >>> > > to move to it? >>> > >>> > No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From >>> > the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the >>> > issues reported for GM45. >>> > >>> > -Ilyes >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > > Adam Williamson >>> > > Fedora QA Community Monkey >>> > > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora >>> > > http://www.happyassassin.net >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > devel mailing list >>> > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > devel mailing list >>> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Sérgio M. B. >>> >>> -- I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16

2012-12-15 Thread Tom London
. I'll be > filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. > > -Ilyes > >> >> >> -- >> Adam Williamson >> Fedora QA Community Monkey >> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora >> http://www.happyassassin.net >> Believe there are a

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

2012-07-09 Thread Tom London
es 95-late.rules \ > > 95-udev-late.rules ; do [[ -f $i ]] && rm -vf /etc/udev/rules.d/$i; > done > > > > # rm -f /etc/os-release; mkdir /tmp/dracut-fixup; \ > ( cd /tmp/dracut-fixup; yumdownloader fedora-release; \ >rpm2cpio fedora-release*.rpm | cpio -id ; cp etc/os-release /etc ); \ >rm -fr /tmp/dracut-fixup > > > > -- > Works for me, thanks! Booted up kernel-3.5.0-0.rc3.git0.2.fc18.x86_64. tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Revelation password manager issue

2012-06-25 Thread Tom London
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Tom London wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Tom London wrote: >>> Hmm... Still seeing spew: >>> Here is what I did: >>> >>> 1. I 'rpm -Uvh --f

Re: Revelation password manager issue

2012-06-25 Thread Tom London
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Tom London wrote: >> Hmm... Still seeing spew: >> Here is what I did: >> >> 1. I 'rpm -Uvh --force' the new package. >> 2. I 'recovered' my old ~/.gconf/app

Re: Revelation password manager issue

2012-06-25 Thread Tom London
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Tom London wrote: > >> Haven't checked the crypto changes, but I do notice this spew when I >> try 'Edit->Preferences': > > Okay I think I have the GConf scriptlets f

Re: Revelation password manager issue

2012-06-24 Thread Tom London
onfig, "passwordgen/punctuation", self.check_punctuation_chars) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/revelation/ui.py", line 182, in config_bind id = cfg.monitor(key, cb_get, widget) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/revelation/config.py", line 150, in mon

Re: FYI, rawhide makes /usr/bin/install (matchpathcon) segfault

2011-09-07 Thread Tom London
s workaround, can we ask rel-eng to untag the >> broken libselinux update? > > Good idea. > Done: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4914 Koji has libselinux-2.1.5-3.fc17.x86_64. Its changelog says: * Tue Sep 06 2011 Dan Walsh - 2.1.5-3 - Fix handling of subset labeli

Re: One big old problem and one new with Rawhide

2011-07-16 Thread Tom London
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Lucas wrote: > On 07/17/2011 01:03 AM, Tom London wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Lucas  wrote: >>> One big problem is that my laptop can't go through systemd startup with >>> selinux enabled. >>> Boot hangs

Re: One big old problem and one new with Rawhide

2011-07-16 Thread Tom London
s trying to do it in level 3). > > What I can do with it? > Need advice. > Thanks. Not sure, but my Rawhide system is booting to gnome just fine with "enforcing=0". tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Are 3.0 kernels working for anyone?

2011-06-11 Thread Tom London
e it? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711015 If so, you need a newer systemd. systemd-28-3.fc16.x86_64 "works for me". tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Are 3.0 kernels working for anyone?

2011-06-10 Thread Tom London
gt; http://www.jamezone.org/ Didn't mention: exclusively using x86_64 version. tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Are 3.0 kernels working for anyone?

2011-06-10 Thread Tom London
> of the traceback and file a bug? > -- "Boots for me" on Thinkpad X200 with SELinux enforcing. gdm-greeter screen is scrambled, but if I blindly enter login/password, gnome comes up just fine. tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: Linux kernel 3.0 + SELinux problem

2011-06-08 Thread Tom London
has a theory about what's going on, I'm all ears.  Thanks, > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711015 Believe updated systemd is building. tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Nautilus still no go in rawhide

2010-09-27 Thread Tom London
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:45 AM, darrell pfeifer wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:30, Tom London wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, darrell pfeifer >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:55, Owen Taylor wrot

Re: Nautilus still no go in rawhide

2010-09-26 Thread Tom London
e. > Interestingly enough, it doesn't segfault under KDE. > darrell > -- Does this sound like your segfaults: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636543 I'm guessing that is some change in the gtk3 interface... tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Nautilus still no go in rawhide

2010-09-25 Thread Tom London
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 09:31 -0700, Tom London wrote: >> 1. Nautilus no longer displays the desktop; believe I got some >> indication that this was part of the move to a newer desktop > > Since you aren't

Re: Nautilus still no go in rawhide

2010-09-25 Thread Tom London
es, etc.). However, the device does appear in 'Places', and it mounts if you select it there. 3. Nautilus segfaults trying to open the device's root folder after selecting in 'Places': https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636543 . But the device is mounted properly tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Nautilus misbehaving

2010-08-29 Thread Tom London
as Description : gsettings-desktop-schemas contains a collection of GSettings schemas for settings shared by various components of a desktop. [...@tlondon ~]$ Nautilus appears not to be starting on login for me; I need to start it manually via 'nautilus --no-default-window&'. BZ'

Re: is it still possible to use upstart as the init-system in F-14?

2010-08-25 Thread Tom London
from F13. The fix is easy: after upgrading just run this command as root and the missing links should be created: # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target rc-local.service remote-fs.target And that should make things work again. Sorry fo

Re: update means only runlevel 1

2010-01-29 Thread Tom London
n runlevell 1. going to even runlevel 3 hangs. > > any suggestions of what might be broken? > > (sorry for the brevity, typing on an inconvenient box) > > darrell > Could this be it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560031 ? tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing