Hi All,
Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they
would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not
seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already
support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would
be nice to
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
distribute
unlike say
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part?
Seriously. I will go buy their stuff
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the
norm for vendor code dumps.
It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:29AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Quote from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria:
All other updates must either:
· reach the criteria laid out in the
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
paraview-3.8.0-4.fc14 (build/make) orion,pertusus
Sorry [Errno 28] No space left on device
Looks like a check
Hi All,
How do the bodhi 7 days timeframes for updates work? My understanding
is that an update is required to be in updates for 7 days. I have an
update that according to bodhi was submitted as an update on the 29th
Aug at 18:13. It was pushed to updates-testing at 19:42 the following
day (Aug
Hi All,
Anyone want to do package review swapsies?
meego-panel-datetime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624204
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/31 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:52 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
(master) branch. I've tested GNOME Shell and quadrapassel, feel free
to CC me for other fallout.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:20 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
snip
entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so
ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2010 06:07 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've orphaned the following packages if anyone wants to pick them up.
They are primarily dead upstream but some might
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
(master) branch. I've tested GNOME Shell and quadrapassel, feel free
to CC me for other fallout.
This will break meego.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:57 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
(master) branch
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
I've orphaned the following packages if anyone wants to pick them up.
They are primarily dead upstream but some might still use them.
libmatchbox
matchbox-window-manager
twitter-glib
Regards,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 17:54 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:43:49PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
that seems like a bit of odd logic. The
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 07:23 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org
wrote:
I have an MTA installed because I expect to get emailed logs, and root
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
my desktop runs on software mirror raid below an lvm. not for
performance but for data recovery reasons. mdmonitor does mail
notification. will this be fixed? how about logwatch, it is really
useful to have to get an
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/23/2010 08:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I know its been discussed
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The problem with delivering this to a user's mailbox via an MTA is that
in the typical case it doesn't result in the user noticing anything
until they've
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires!
If we follow
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires!
If we follow the general state of things: if a package might need
something,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:43:49PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
that seems like a bit of odd logic. The logs are emitted to syslog with
the same thought in mind - that someone will read them - but that is
also not
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
On 08/23/2010 02:21 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jon Mastersjonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex
Hi All,
I know its been discussed in the past but there's been reasons not to
drop a default MTA but now that cronie (the last actual dependency)
has support for logging to system logs is there any reason to include
an MTA by default for F-14?
Peter
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
Hello all,
currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
is a dependency of
logcheck:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an
older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network
transparency, which is just
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz
from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile
canditdate as there's quite a few of them around
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
running at 200 MHz, it
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan: nas
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
python2.7 failed because of rhpl package. rhpl
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 02.08.10 23:50, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
So, I guess what I want to say is: I will return full-time to PA not so
far away. And I have a queue of patches in my checkout (including
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on
bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds. If someone
familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to
make sure the changes
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora users.
Language such as this is not being excellent
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Carl G. carl.gaudrea...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
you can get real work done. /s
Let me know if you need some help to
make the
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 02.08.10 23:09, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Carl G
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
for our package specs,
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/30 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com:
Le 30/07/2010 01:07, Jesse Keating a écrit :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT
We just might finish up before the 48 hour window is up!
Thanks for that
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Great news!
Few questions still remains unanswered for me:
* Should I use git now?
* May I still use cvs?
* If I'll add some changes right now using git/cvs will they be
available in cvs/git respectively?
* I just
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
for a distribution that's lost their
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:48 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Completely ignore OLPC* they are historical and are no longer used.
I see active build targets in koji for dist-olpc
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/22/2010 03:45 PM +9:00:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:54:32AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
right now a glibc build is going on that has --enablekernel=2.6.32
from Jakub
Bumping
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:28 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
2010/7/7 Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:59 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello Fedora!
snip
==
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
michael.silva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/10 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Yes, but most of the Netbook side of things are from Moblin. Also if
you look
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two new packages for review:
teal:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384
ghc-feldspar-language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
Anyone interested in review swap?
I'm
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
There is an ongoing outage at this time in PHX2. The exact start time is
not yet known and the ETA to be fixed is not yet known.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
I wonder about the maintainer ship of epiphany. The ownership of it is
gecko-maint but in none of the current versions of fedora is epiphany
gecko based and of the 18 other maintainers not a single person is on
the bugzilla watch ACL. There's a bug that was introduced at some
point in the F-13
56 matches
Mail list logo
