Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/10/2015 03:12 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 12/10/2015 01:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking purposes, it may not

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Florian Weimer
On 12/10/2015 01:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: >> dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking >> purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for depend

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/10/2015 02:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter: Florian Weimer wrote: When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Require

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter: > > >Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > >>When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: > > >>dependencies have

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter: > >Florian Weimer wrote: > > > >>When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: > >>dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking > >>purposes, it m

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/10/2015 02:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies h

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have run. But are the files already there? (I'm

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Florian Weimer
On 12/10/2015 12:53 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: > >> When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: >> dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking >> purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have >> run. But a

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter: Florian Weimer wrote: When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have run. But are the fil

Re: %post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Florian Weimer wrote: > When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: > dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking > purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have > run. But are the files already there? I think the answer in

%post RPM scriptlets and dependencies

2015-12-10 Thread Florian Weimer
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires: dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have run. But are the files already there? (I'm interested in plain Requires, not Requires(post