Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-10-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! So I've (finally) got ready an initial round of draft > changes to various wiki pages for the purpose of implementing the 'No > More Alphas' Change. You can find all the drafts in the NoMoreAlphas > category: > >

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-22 Thread Sudhir D
On 08/22/2017 07:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:18:04PM +0530, Sudhir D wrote: On a slightly different thought, if we run all existing Alpha criteria tests in rawhide, we can then probably look at existing Alpha blocker as Branch blocker.. i.e, we don't branch unless

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:18:04PM +0530, Sudhir D wrote: > On a slightly different thought, if we run all existing Alpha > criteria tests in rawhide, we can then probably look at existing > Alpha blocker as Branch blocker.. i.e, we don't branch unless the > blockers are fixed and thereby keeping

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-22 Thread Sudhir D
On 08/03/2017 05:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: * My proposal for 'what do we do about release criteria / validation' is basically: the 'Fedora 27 Alpha Release Criteria' page gets renamed 'Basic Release Criteria' (note: not versioned, I don't think it should be), and we document that *all*

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:41:34PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > To be clear, if this isn't just an idle thought but a specific request > that "yes, blockerbugs-nextrelease would be an extremely useful thing > for me, please do it", we probably *can* do that. If that's the case, > please file a

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 23:45 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Is there any chance of running that at, say, > > > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs-nextrelease/ instead of a > > > local instance? > > > > I mean, in *theory*

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Is there any chance of running that at, say, > > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs-nextrelease/ instead of a > > local instance? > I mean, in *theory* we could for sure, it's just yet another > maintenance task for

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 00:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:50:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Will the blockerbugs app start showing F28 blockers at the F27 branch > > > point? Or sometime later? From my point of view, the sooner the better. > > > > It tends to

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:50:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Will the blockerbugs app start showing F28 blockers at the F27 branch > > point? Or sometime later? From my point of view, the sooner the better. > It tends to go wrong in various ways when you have multiple releases > 'active'

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 21:18 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:16:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > quite meet what we aspire to. I do *NOT* propose to have any kind of > > blocker tracking bug for the Basic release criteria; it doesn't seem to > > fit in the process,

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:51:56AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > claims that the 'Completion deadline' "falls on the same day as the > > Alpha milestone freeze", but the Fedora Release Life Cycle page - > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle - claims it > > falls on the

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:16:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > quite meet what we aspire to. I do *NOT* propose to have any kind of > blocker tracking bug for the Basic release criteria; it doesn't seem to > fit in the process, there is no Alpha release to block, and we can't > realistically

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 08/02/2017 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! So I've (finally) got ready an initial round of draft > changes to various wiki pages for the purpose of implementing the 'No > More Alphas' Change. You can find all the drafts in the NoMoreAlphas > category: > >

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-03 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:16:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! So I've (finally) got ready an initial round of draft > changes to various wiki pages for the purpose of implementing the 'No > More Alphas' Change. You can find all the drafts in the NoMoreAlphas > category: >

'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-02 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks! So I've (finally) got ready an initial round of draft changes to various wiki pages for the purpose of implementing the 'No More Alphas' Change. You can find all the drafts in the NoMoreAlphas category: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:NoMoreAlpha For each page I cloned the