On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
modplugtools needs to be changed to not ship modplugplay anymore, but
modplug123 should still work.
Done in F-20+.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
The following packages have been retired:
alsa-oss
firmware-extract
firstboot
gkrellm-timestamp
guiloader
justmoon
lybniz
mars-sim
miau
openstack-tempo
osgal
python3-cherrypy
vblade
Because alsa-oss was retired, mumble needs to be rebuild without OSS
support (just removing the BR failed in a
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages have been retired:
alsa-oss
firmware-extract
firstboot
gkrellm-timestamp
guiloader
justmoon
lybniz
mars-sim
miau
openstack-tempo
osgal
python3-cherrypy
vblade
Because alsa-oss was
The following packages have been retired:
alsa-oss
firmware-extract
firstboot
gkrellm-timestamp
guiloader
justmoon
lybniz
mars-sim
miau
openstack-tempo
osgal
python3-cherrypy
vblade
Because alsa-oss was retired, mumble needs to be rebuild without OSS
support (just removing the BR failed in a
2013/8/16 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
$ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8]
Actually, now that I re-read what we did before, for F-20 we'd block things
that have failed to build since *before* F-18, i.e., those with fc17 or
earlier dist tags.
Which shortens the list to:
Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting,
FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source?rd=FTBFS#Package_Removal_for_Long-standing_FTBFS_bugs
removing long standing FTBFS packages might be
(Sorry, I forgot to add the package maintainers address to Bcc,
therefore this message will appear twice on the devel mailing list)
Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting,
FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:26:45PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FTBFS packages need:
1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
still have earlier
在 2013-8-17 PM5:00，Till Maas opensou...@till.name写道：
becicku, mcepl
Please don't retire it, I'm planning an update these days.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 17 August 2013 10:00, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Due to missing FTBFS bug reports for Fedora 18 and a bug in scripting,
FTBFS packages were missing in previous reports. According to
On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases [...]
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
--
Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
在 2013-8-16 PM7:25，Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com写道：
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
Why?
Still many FTBFS on my hand, most are related to docdir change.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 19:37:29 +0800,
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2013-8-16 PM7:25，Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com写道：
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
Why?
Still many FTBFS on my
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases [...]
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
(take 2)
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases [...]
From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are
there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well?
--
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FTBFS packages need:
1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
still have earlier dist tags
There is no such bug, therefore I checked whether any package from
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FTBFS packages need:
1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
still have earlier dist tags
[snip]
Nevertheless, as far as I can see there is nothing
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FTBFS packages need:
1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
still have
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FTBFS packages need:
1) a list gathered by pruning the old
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 f20 ausil
lsvpd-1.6.8-3.fc15f20 ausil
... and note that these two are PPC only, IIRC.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 f20 ausil
lsvpd-1.6.8-3.fc15f20 ausil
... and note that these two are
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill
On 08/16/2013 03:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
your better off using koji to query the builds tagged as it gives you
the source package named.
$ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8]
torque-3.0.4-1.fc17 f20 stevetraylen
I've given torque a
Here is a status update, many orphans were adopted, but some new
appeared:
Package(co)maintainers
bluecoveorphan
cal3d orphan
dayplanner orphan, rakesh
derelictorphan,
On 10 August 2013 19:50, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Package(co)maintainers
===
cpptasks orphan
Taken.
--
devel mailing list
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 20:50:26 +0200,
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
On 08/07/2013 04:38 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
I don't understand why manaplus was orphaned just after 8 months it
got into Fedora.
If you can't keep it, don't package it.
Hello,
I was the maintainer of manaplus and the one who brought it into Fedora.
Back then manaplus was supposed to
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 23:13:52 +0200,
Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@gmail.com wrote:
Back then manaplus was supposed to replace mana as the client for
TMW. However TMW does not seem to be dropping mana support now.
For the time being tmw requires manaplus, so that dropping manaplus
PyOpenGL taken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F20) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
I'll take Package fuse-zip (orphan).
2013/8/8 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com
I will retire acheck* as it has been orphaned by Debian because dead
upstream since 2006.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Don't be so judgmental. Life isn't as predicable as one would hope.
There are many reasons for people to stop maintaining a package, and
many times people don't feel comfortable sharing that information with
stranger.
Sb.
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:12 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Don't be so judgmental. Life isn't as predicable as one would hope.
There are many reasons for people to stop maintaining a package, and
many times people don't
On 6 August 2013 22:27, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Package easymock3 (orphan)
Taken.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 7 August 2013 10:15, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 6 August 2013 22:27, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Package easymock3 (orphan)
Taken.
Oh wait, msrb already took it. :-)
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:38:04 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
I don't understand why manaplus was orphaned just after 8 months it
got into Fedora.
If you can't keep it, don't package it.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/187271.html
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 23:27:42 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Package gnome-vfs2 (orphan)
List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build:
Without examining the script, it seems it doesn't handle the dependencies
of dependencies but just the first level. Is that expected?
Package gnome-vfs2 (orphan)
Package gnome-vfs2-monikers (orphan)
Package python-jsonpickle (orphan)
I've taken these. Co-maintainers welcome.
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek
...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, 7 August, 2013 2:30:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20
Package gnome-vfs2 (orphan)
Package gnome-vfs2-monikers (orphan)
Package python-jsonpickle (orphan
: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20
Package gnome-vfs2 (orphan)
Package gnome-vfs2-monikers (orphan)
Package python-jsonpickle (orphan)
I've taken these. Co-maintainers welcome.
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
The script that generated this page can be found at
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py
There you can also report bugs and RFEs.
Where exactly?
There you can also is a leftover from when the URL was
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 23:27:42 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Package gnome-vfs2 (orphan)
List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build:
Without examining the script, it seems it doesn't handle the
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:27:42PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when Fedora 20
is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the
package should be retired, please do so already to add a proper reason
to the SCM:
- Original Message -
From: Till Maas opensou...@till.name
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 5:33:42 PM
Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:27:42PM
I will retire acheck* as it has been orphaned by Debian because dead
upstream since 2006.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when Fedora 20
is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the
package should be retired, please do so already to add a proper reason
to the SCM:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
On 08/06/2013 03:27 PM, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when Fedora 20
is branched, unless someone adopts them.
Removing: python-AppTools
Mayavi requires python-apptools = 4.2.0-2.fc20
python-envisage requires python-AppTools = 4.2.0-2.fc20
I don't understand why manaplus was orphaned just after 8 months it
got into Fedora.
If you can't keep it, don't package it.
Taken:
perl-ExtUtils-CChecker
perl-Async-MergePoint
perl-Geo-METAR
sabayon
libntlm
flickcurl
ctemplate
desktopcouch
dnrd
ginac
elektra(EL5 branch not taken)
sitecopy
* Till Maas [06/08/2013 23:27] :
Package perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined (orphan)
Taken.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
I don't understand why manaplus was orphaned just after 8 months it
got into Fedora.
If you can't keep it, don't package it.
Don't be so judgmental. Life isn't as predicable as one would hope.
There are many reasons for people to stop
51 matches
Mail list logo
