On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:59:45PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Right, I thought the point was the possibility of holding the
> conference slighly *later* if that improves EU folks' ability to
> attend.
Just throwing this out there (not necessarily for this next summer), but I
think _June_ work
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:45:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:12:30 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepiu
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:12:30 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >>> On 24/09/1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 8
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> >>>E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
> >>>it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday se
On 09/25/2014 08:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
Are you located in EMEA or APAC? Because Flock alternates between No
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
>> it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
>
> Are you located in EMEA or APAC? Because Flock alternates between North
> America and EMEA I think partially
On 09/23/2014 02:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
airports at the *targeted* period.
If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2014 02:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
>> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from
>> pre-determined airports at the *targeted* period. If I trust
>> informations from the proposals, SLC would be too
Il 23/set/2014 10:48 "Jaroslav Reznik" ha scritto:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> > airports at the *targeted* period.
> > If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> > to cover travel expenses
- Original Message -
> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> airports at the *targeted* period.
> If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
Looking on airfare prices, all options seems to
On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> airports at the *targeted* period.
> If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
>
A brief look revealed, a trip e.g. to Cap
Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
airports at the *targeted* period.
If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
@+
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:04:52 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Matthias Runge
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >> (Sorry for top-posting)
> >>
> >> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming sho
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
>> On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> (Sorry for top-posting)
>>
>> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
>> Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll
On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> (Sorry for top-posting)
>
> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
> Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll.
>
>
To make it a bit more complicate: could we have more specifi
(Sorry for top-posting)
I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll.
> On Sep 21, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As
17 matches
Mail list logo
