On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 03:57:27PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > We've got to fix this so that non-blocking deliverables like this can be
> > delivered independent of the main compose.
> Before looking at long-term solutions, we need a process to get F29 Xfce,
> LXQt and Astronomy images (with
Matthew Miller wrote:
> We've got to fix this so that non-blocking deliverables like this can be
> delivered independent of the main compose.
Before looking at long-term solutions, we need a process to get F29 Xfce,
LXQt and Astronomy images (with official Fedora branding) signed off and
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:55:10PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > We've got to fix this so that non-blocking deliverables like this can be
> > delivered independent of the main compose.
> I think we have been saying that for multiple releases. What does it
> take to move this to the top of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:23:36PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Maybe this is a bit radical, but perhaps we shouldn't *have* a
> super-large compose in itself? If we decouple most of the deliverable
It does seem like separating out the live ISOs is an easy step.
> %packages sections for
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:02 PM Christian Dersch
wrote:
>
> Having that criterion " if there's an RC specific failure to output images
> that didn't cause nightlies to fail, then we have to find out what's going
> on." would be really nice.
>
> Greetings,
> Christian
>
Christian, I absolutely
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Christian Dersch
>
> I understand the complaint in isolation, but in relation to the
> existing processes and release criteria I do not follow. What solution
> do you propose?
>
> Right now release criteria explicitly does not block the release even
> if all
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On 25/10/2018 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped
>> > live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
>> >
>> > For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs
>>
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 15:16, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed?
> > > It is not visible here
> > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/
> > See
> >
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Christian Dersch
wrote:
> On 25/10/2018 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped
>> live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
>>
>> For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs
>> [3].
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed?
> > > It is not visible here
> > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/
> > See
> >
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed?
>> > It is not visible here
>> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/
>> See
>>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed?
> > It is not visible here
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/
> See
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:09 PM chandan kumar
wrote:
> Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed?
> It is not visible here
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/
>
See
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:37 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:23 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > Yes, I agree, I am at a loss as to why it was signed off as well,
> > there was blockers like "Be able to apply updates using the desktop
> > mechanism" that were seemingly
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:23 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> Yes, I agree, I am at a loss as to why it was signed off as well,
> there was blockers like "Be able to apply updates using the desktop
> mechanism" that were seemingly ignored with broken gnome-software,
> plus numerous other issues. I
> On 25/10/2018 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped
> > live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
> >
> > For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs
> > [3].
> >
> > Thank you to everyone who has worked on this
On 25/10/2018 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped
live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3].
Thank you to everyone who has worked on this release.
[1]
The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped
live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3].
Thank you to everyone who has worked on this release.
[1] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/
18 matches
Mail list logo
