Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-11 Thread Pavel Simerda
- Original Message - > From: "Václav Pavlín" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Bill Nottingham" > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:54:27 PM > Subject: Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard' > &g

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-11 Thread Václav Pavlín
On 6.12.2013 10:56, Jakub Filak wrote: I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. Regarding the discussion, there are two main concernes about adding abrt-cli to Standard comps group: 1) There will be some notifications popping up which can confuse users. Not true. Noth

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:51 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > No not really our distribution is filled with just packagers that > dont > know what to do with those reports... So you're saying: "Our maintainers can't fix bugs, why bother filing them at all?"? That doesn't make sense to me at

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jakub Filak
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 20:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: > > I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. > > > > The package pulls core ABRT functionality for catching C/C++ crashes, > > uncaught Python exceptions, Kernel oo

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:08:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:18 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > And what purpose does abrt serve if there aren't people fixing the issue > > it reports on the other end... > > Well, that's easy enough to shoot down. > >

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:39 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > I would say that abrt should not be installed et all unless user has agreed > > to it at install time. > > +1 > > My mother would be puzzled, if ABRT would popup on her Fedora bo

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:18 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > And what purpose does abrt serve if there aren't people fixing the issue > it reports on the other end... Well, that's easy enough to shoot down. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CLOSED&classification=Fedora&l

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 16:07 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > This approach has been > > working perfectly for many years and I don't think much has changed in > > that area lately. > There were reports of abrt sending out private and confidential > information to the net and reports of abrt sen

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Bill Nottingham
Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) said: > On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: > >I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, > >which is quite important to have stable > >system. So although being puzzled is not very nice, being disappointed by > >crashing

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: > I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. > > The package pulls core ABRT functionality for catching C/C++ crashes, > uncaught Python exceptions, Kernel oopses and VMCore processing. If -cli means no GUI, and thus no popu

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/06/2013 04:07 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:45 PM, Michal Toman wrote: On 06.12.2013 14:34, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:14 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: ABRT does not send *any* information unless you agree to do it. Not even the anonymous reports. It is true that

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/06/2013 02:45 PM, Michal Toman wrote: On 06.12.2013 14:34, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:14 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: ABRT does not send *any* information unless you agree to do it. Not even the anonymous reports. It is true that the settings could be in Anaconda and I think i

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Michal Toman
On 06.12.2013 14:51, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 01:47 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: We all do fix the application for his mother, after it's reported by ABRT or any other means:-) No not really our distribution is filled with just packagers that dont know what to do with those

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/06/2013 02:34 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:14 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps gr

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/06/2013 01:47 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: We all do fix the application for his mother, after it's reported by ABRT or any other means:-) No not really our distribution is filled with just packagers that dont know what to do with those reports... ABRT should not be installed by default

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Lukas Zapletal
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:06:14PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >>My mother would be puzzled, if ABRT would popup on her Fedora box. > > > >Your mother will be puzzled with crashing application as well. > >Better to explain ABRT and have less crashing applications then > >the opposite. >

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Michal Toman
On 06.12.2013 14:34, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:14 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps grou

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/06/2013 02:14 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 12/06/2013 02:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. The package pulls core ABRT fu

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/06/2013 01:14 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 6.12.2013 14:05, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, which is quite important to have stable system. So although being puzzled is not very

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: So try to look at it from broader perspective - I see more benefits in having abrt installed. Such as confidential business information being forwarded to RedHat and being snooped by the NSA to forward it to your enterprise's competitor? You migh

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/06/2013 02:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. The package pulls core ABRT functionality for catching C/C++ crashes, uncaugh

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 6.12.2013 14:05, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, which is quite important to have stable system. So although being puzzled is not very nice, being disappointed by crashing applic

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/06/2013 02:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 01:05 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, which is quite important to have stable system. So although being puzzled

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. The package pulls core ABRT functionality for catching C/C++ crashes, uncaught Python exceptions, Kernel oopses and VMCore p

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/06/2013 02:06 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 12/06/2013 12:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 6.12.2013 12:39, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: I would say that abrt should not be installed et all unless user has agreed to it at install

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/06/2013 01:05 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, which is quite important to have stable system. So although being puzzled is not very nice, being disappointed by crashing applic

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/06/2013 12:51 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 6.12.2013 12:39, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: I would say that abrt should not be installed et all unless user has agreed to it at install time. +1 My mother would be puzzled, if ABRT would po

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote: I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, which is quite important to have stable system. So although being puzzled is not very nice, being disappointed by crashing applications is much worse from my point of view. So

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Václav Pavlín
On Pá 6. prosinec 2013, 12:39:09 CET, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: I would say that abrt should not be installed et all unless user has agreed to it at install time. I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected crashes, whi

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 6.12.2013 12:39, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: I would say that abrt should not be installed et all unless user has agreed to it at install time. +1 My mother would be puzzled, if ABRT would popup on her Fedora box. Your mother will b

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 12/06/2013 12:14 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: I would say that abrt should not be installed et all unless user has agreed to it at install time. +1 My mother would be puzzled, if ABRT would popup on her Fedora box. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #d

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. The package pulls core ABRT functionality for catching C/C++ crashes, uncaught Python exceptions, Kernel oopses and VMCore processing. There is a bugzilla bug requesting this chan

ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

2013-12-06 Thread Jakub Filak
Hello, I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'. The package pulls core ABRT functionality for catching C/C++ crashes, uncaught Python exceptions, Kernel oopses and VMCore processing. There is a bugzilla bug requesting this change: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?