Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-17 Thread Mat Booth
On 12 June 2015 at 21:32, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Šimáček
On 2015-06-12 22:32, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-14 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-12 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2015-06-11, Carlos O'Donell car...@redhat.com wrote: Otherwise build-essentials will get cargo-culted into every spec file and we're back to a defined buildroot standard based on build-essentials which will grow over the years. All the things RCM wanted to avoid. I fully agree with this

Re: Build-essential packages (was: Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines)

2015-06-12 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to define the buildroot and rpm is free to

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-12 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-11 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 06/11/2015 02:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to define the buildroot and rpm is free to change its

Build-essential packages (was: Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines)

2015-06-11 Thread Florian Weimer
On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to define the buildroot and rpm is free to change its dependency list. *