Fabio Valentini wrote:
> AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a
> compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so
> breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly
> worse) for very long.

Isn't that the real issue to fix? Failed Rawhide composes used to be a rare 
event. Now we have both Rawhide and Branched composes broken for days at a 
time, e.g., currently since February 20. This is just not acceptable.

Something needs to be done to make the compose process more robust, e.g.:
* running createrepo on a stable release, so that we do not have to be able
  to init a chroot of the target system to compose a repository. A broken
  dependency, even in systemd or rpm, should NEVER be a reason for the
  repository to fail to compose.
* publishing individual deliverables one at a time, i.e.:
  1. compose the repositories,
  2. sync the repositories out to the mirrors,
  3. build the images (atomic ostrees, live images etc.) one at a time,
  4. sync those images that succeeded out to the mirrors, keep the old
     versions of the other ones (the matching SRPMs are in Koji anyway, so
     it does not matter if the SRPMs in the tree don't match)
etc.

Right now, e.g., we have a known broken GCC (8.0.1-0.14) in the Rawhide and 
Branched trees (which miscompiles the Chromium/QtWebEngine build tool GN on 
x86_64), the fix (8.0.1-0.16) has already been in the right Koji tags for 
days, but any third-party repository (RPM Fusion, Copr, etc.) will still get 
the broken GCC. This is not acceptable.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to