Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-10-05, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: My particular reason for asking is that I'm looking at a soname bump for libpng, and if repoquery is telling me the truth, there are about 1200 packages that will need to be rebuilt. Few days ago I've been asked by Marcela how should I cope with

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Jesse Keating
On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net writes: tl;dr if you're looking for bodhi to allow on-demand creation of topic-tags for isolating build efforts from rawhide, that's too expensive of an item to allow a free-for-all at this time, in my opinion. Fair enough. Is there a policy or

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Jesse Keating
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net writes: tl;dr if you're looking for bodhi to allow on-demand creation of topic-tags for isolating build efforts from rawhide, that's too expensive of an item to allow a free-for-all at this time, in my

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:06 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we could use that for Rawhide so we don't break all

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-10-03 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-30, Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and it's available in build root now. -- Petr The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build your

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-30 Thread Honza Horak
On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and it's available in build root now. -- Petr The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build your package(s) if depends on gdbm. Also python and perl can

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-29, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-29 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we could use that for Rawhide so we don't break all dependent things for people who want to test something else

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-22 Thread Paul Howarth
On 09/21/2011 04:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:23:52 -0600 Jerry Jamesloganje...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote: Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages built. The chain-build facility

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:32:11 +0100 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: ...snip... The first package is already in the build root. Yes, but there's still a wait until it's actually available to build against, though it's usually a wait of less than an hour rather than the next day.

GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Petr Pisar
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Honza Horak
On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. That

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a): On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the upgrade

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote: It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages built.

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote: It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as Chain building is

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote: That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other packages (Perl, Python and similar) get

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:01:10 +0200 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a): I understand that buildroot override in bodhi works for f16 and lower only, am I wrong? I wanted to create a new

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages built. The chain-build facility is very useful. But when you've got a chain of 3 packages to build, and the build of the second one fails, then you're

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:23:52 -0600 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages built. The chain-build facility is very useful. But when you've got a

Re: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the upgrade will be performed in F17 directly. That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root

Re: Buildroot overrides in Rawhide, was: GDBM upgrade in F17

2011-09-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21.9.2011 16:52, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): Its strange to me. There are concerns to have Rawhide usable but at the end, if somebody wants to prevents problems using dedicated build root, it is denied by Rel-Engs, because it is probably to much work. This is disappointing. Every target added